BSI PD IEC TS 61400-31:2023
$198.66
Wind energy generation systems – Siting risk assessment
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2023 | 60 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
9 | 1 Scope |
10 | 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions |
14 | 3.2 Symbols used in this document |
15 | 3.3 Abbreviated terms 4 Risk assessment process 4.1 Overview Figures Figure 1 – Flow chart of the risk assessment process(Modified from ISO/IEC Guide 51 [3]) |
16 | 4.2 Documentation requirements in the risk assessment process 4.3 Involvement of stakeholders Figure 2 – The risk assessment process |
17 | 5 Risk management throughout service life 5.1 Overview 5.2 Reviewing, documenting and reporting of the risk management process |
18 | 6 Harm to people 6.1 Overview 6.2 Direct harm 6.3 Indirect harm |
19 | 6.4 Domino effect 6.5 Consequences of impacts of objects 7 Risk assessment approaches and associated acceptance criteria 7.1 Risk assessment approaches |
21 | 7.2 Risk acceptance criteria Figure 3 – Flow chart of the selection of risk assessmentmethods with different levels of fidelity |
22 | 7.3 Risk regions Figure 4 – Risk regions |
23 | 7.4 Types of risk criteria 7.5 Prescriptive risk acceptance criteria Tables Table 1 – Examples of risk acceptance criteria for different risk assessment approaches |
24 | 7.6 Qualitative risk acceptance criteria 7.7 Semi-quantitative risk acceptance criteria |
25 | 7.8 Quantitative risk acceptance criteria 7.8.1 General Figure 5 – Example tables for a semi-quantitative risk assessment |
26 | 7.8.2 Quantitative risk criteria for individuals |
28 | 7.8.3 Quantitative societal risk criteria Table 2 – Policy factor according to [11] |
29 | Figure 6 – Combination of hazards and impacted persons. |
30 | Figure 7 – Example of an f-N plot |
31 | Figure 8 – Example of societal risk criteria |
32 | 8 Hazard identification 8.1 General 8.2 General principles of hazard identification 8.3 Wind turbine failure modes 8.3.1 General 8.3.2 Tower collapse 8.3.3 Shedding of hub or nacelle |
33 | 8.3.4 Rotor blade failure 8.4 Ice fall and ice throw |
34 | 8.5 Fire 8.6 Occupancy |
35 | 8.7 Project relevant hazards 9 Estimation of the risk 9.1 General 9.2 Wind turbine failures – tower collapse, shedding of hub or nacelle and rotor blade failure 9.2.1 General |
36 | 9.2.2 Input information 9.2.3 Additional assumptions/models |
37 | 9.2.4 Tower collapse 9.2.5 Shedding of hub or nacelle 9.2.6 Blade breakage |
38 | 9.2.7 Summation of impact probabilities and risks 9.3 Ice fall and ice throw 9.3.1 Input information |
39 | 9.3.2 Additional assumptions/models 9.3.3 Calculation of trajectories of ice pieces |
40 | 9.4 Wind turbine fire 9.5 Calculation of the risk 9.5.1 General |
41 | 9.5.2 Effective cross-section for people and cars 9.6 Analysis of domino effects Table 3 – Examples for hazardous installations that could be affected by domino effects triggered by wind turbine failures |
42 | 10 Risk evaluation 11 Risk treatment 11.1 General 11.2 Selection of risk reduction measures 11.3 Examples of risk reduction measures |
43 | 11.4 Ice detection systems and rotor blade heating systems |
44 | 12 Uncertainties in risk assessments |
46 | Annex A (informative)Summary of failure frequencies published by the Dutch RIVM Table A.1 – Failure frequencies from [13] in units of failures per turbine and year. |
47 | Annex B (informative)Overview of used risk criteria in different countries Table B.1 – Overview of used risk criteria in different countries |
51 | Annex C (informative)Introduction to trajectory models for blades and blade fragments |
52 | Figure C.1 – Blade-fixed and inertial reference frames. |
56 | Bibliography |