{"id":137801,"date":"2024-10-19T07:57:57","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T07:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/fema-p-58-1-2012\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T00:09:07","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T00:09:07","slug":"fema-p-58-1-2012","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/fema\/fema-p-58-1-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"FEMA P 58 1 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"
None<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | FEMAP-58-1 Cover_Final <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
2<\/td>\n | 00-V1_TitlePage_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | 01-V1_Foreword_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | 02-V1_Preface_Final_508.pdf <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 03-V1_Dedication_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | 04-V1_TableofContents_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 05-V1_ListofFigures_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 06-V1_ListofTables_Final_508 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 07-V1_Ch01_Introduction_Final_508 1.1 Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 1.2 The Need for Next-Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design Procedures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 1.3 The Performance-Based Design Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 1.4 Scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 1.5 Basis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 1.6 Limitations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 1.7 Products <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 1.8 Organization and Content <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | 08-V1_Ch02_Methodology_Final_508 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Performance Measures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 2.3 Factors Affecting Performance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 2.4 Uncertainty in Performance Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 2.5 Types of Performance Assessment 2.5.1 Intensity-Based Assessments 2.5.2 Scenario-Based Assessments 2.5.3 Time-Based Assessments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 2.6 The Methodology 2.6.1 Assemble Building Performance Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | 2.6.2 Define Earthquake Hazards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | 2.6.3 Analyze Building Response <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 2.6.4 Develop Collapse Fragility 2.6.5 Calculate Performance 2.6.5.1 Intensity-Based and Scenario-Based Assessments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | 2.6.5.2 Time-Based Assessments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 09-V1_Ch03_Building Performance Model_Final_508 3.1 Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 3.2 Basic Building Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 3.3 Occupancy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | 3.4 Population Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 3.5 Fragility and Performance Groups 3.5.1 Fragility Groups <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | 3.5.2 Performance Groups <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | 3.5.3 Normative Quantities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 3.5.4 Fragility Units of Measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | 3.5.5 Rugged Components 3.6 Damage States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | 3.6.1 Damage Logic <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | 3.6.2 Damage Correlation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 3.7 Demand Parameters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | 3.8 Component Fragility 3.8.1 Fragility Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | 3.8.2 Fragility Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | 3.8.3 Provided Fragility Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | 3.8.4 Calculated Fragilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | 3.9 Consequence Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | 3.9.1 Repair Costs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | 3.9.2 Repair Time <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 3.9.3 Unsafe Placarding 3.9.4 Casualties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | 3.10 Fragility Specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | 10-V1_Ch04_Earthquake Hazards_Final_508 \n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | 11-V1_Ch05_Analysis_Final_508 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Nonlinear Response History Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | 5.2.1 Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
105<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 Number of Analyses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | 5.2.3 Floor Velocity and Floor Acceleration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
107<\/td>\n | 5.2.4 Quality Assurance 5.2.5 Uncertainty <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
111<\/td>\n | 5.3 Simplified Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
112<\/td>\n | 5.3.1 Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
113<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 Simplified Analysis Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
120<\/td>\n | 5.4 Residual Drift (5-25) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
122<\/td>\n | 12-V1_Ch06_Collapse Fragility_Final_508 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Nonlinear Response History Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
123<\/td>\n | 6.2.1 Definition of Collapse 6.2.2 Mathematical Models In general, three-dimensional mathematical models should be used for collapse assessment. Two-dimensional (planar) models may be sufficient in cases where buildings have regular configurations, the translational response in each orthogonal direction … <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
124<\/td>\n | 6.2.3 Incremental Dynamic Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
125<\/td>\n | 6.2.4 Limited-Suite Nonlinear Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
126<\/td>\n | 6.3 Simplified Nonlinear Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
128<\/td>\n | 6.4 Judgment-Based Collapse Fragility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
130<\/td>\n | 6.5 Collapse Modes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
133<\/td>\n | 13-V1_Ch07_Calculate Performance_Final_508 7.1 Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
134<\/td>\n | 7.2 Demand Simulation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
135<\/td>\n | 7.2.1 Nonlinear Response History Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
136<\/td>\n | 7.2.2 Simplified Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
137<\/td>\n | 7.3 Realization Initiation 7.4 Collapse Determination 7.4.1 Collapse Mode <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
138<\/td>\n | 7.4.2 Casualties 7.4.3 Repair Cost and Repair Time <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
139<\/td>\n | 7.5 Damage Calculation 7.5.1 Sequential Damage States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
140<\/td>\n | 7.5.2 Mutually Exclusive Damage States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
141<\/td>\n | 7.5.3 Simultaneous Damage States 7.6 Loss Calculation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
142<\/td>\n | 7.6.1 Unsafe Placard Loss Calculation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
143<\/td>\n | 7.7 Time-Based Assessments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
146<\/td>\n | 14-V1_Ch08_Decision Making_Final_508 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Code Equivalence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
147<\/td>\n | 8.3 Use of Scenario-Based Assessment Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
149<\/td>\n | 8.4 Use of Time-Based Assessment Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
152<\/td>\n | 8.5 Probable Maximum Loss <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
154<\/td>\n | 15-V1_Appendix A_Probabilities_Final_508 A.1 Introduction A.2 Statistical Distributions A.2.1 Finite Populations and Discrete Outcomes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
155<\/td>\n | A.2.2 Combined Probabilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
156<\/td>\n | A.2.3 Mass Distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
157<\/td>\n | A.2.4 Infinite Populations and Continuous Distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
159<\/td>\n | A.3 Common Forms of Distributions A.3.1 Normal Distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
160<\/td>\n | A.3.2 Cumulative Probability Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
161<\/td>\n | A.3.3 Lognormal Distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
164<\/td>\n | A.4 Probabilities over Time <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | 16-V1_Appendix B_Ground Shaking Hazards_Final_508 B.1 Introduction B.2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
166<\/td>\n | Western North America (WNA) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
167<\/td>\n | B.3 Fault Rupture Directivity and Maximum Direction Shaking <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
168<\/td>\n | B.4 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
169<\/td>\n | B.4.1 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Calculations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
176<\/td>\n | B.4.2 Inclusion of Rupture Directivity Effects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
177<\/td>\n | B.4.3 Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard Curves and Epsilon <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
179<\/td>\n | B.4.4 Conditional Mean Spectrum and Spectral Shape <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
182<\/td>\n | B.5 Vertical Earthquake Shaking <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
183<\/td>\n | B.5.1 Procedure for Site Classes A, B, and C B.5.2 Procedure for Site Classes D and E <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
184<\/td>\n | B.6 Soil-Structure Interaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
185<\/td>\n | B.6.1 Direct Analysis B.6.2 Simplified Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
187<\/td>\n | B.7 Alternative Procedure for Hazard Characterization to Explicitly Consider Ground Motion Dispersion in Nonlinear Response History Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
190<\/td>\n | Similarly, spectral matching of pairs of motions can be used in lieu of selecting pairs of ground motions with geomean spectral shapes that are similar to CMSi. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
191<\/td>\n | 17-V1_Appendix C_Residual Drift_Final_508 Generation of Realizations for Loss Computations C.1 Introduction C.2 Past Research on Prediction of Residual Drift <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
195<\/td>\n | C.3 Model to Calculate Residual Drift <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
196<\/td>\n | C.4 Damage States for Residual Drift <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
199<\/td>\n | 18-V1_Appendix D_Fragility Specifications_Final_508 D.1 Summary of Provided Fragility Specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
211<\/td>\n | 19-V1_Appendix E_Population_Final_508 E.1 Population Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
218<\/td>\n | 20-V1_Appendix F_Normative Quantities_Final_508 F.1 Normative Quantities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
236<\/td>\n | 21-V1_Appendix G_Simulated Demands_Final_508 G.1 Introduction G.2 Nonlinear Response History Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
237<\/td>\n | G.2.1 Algorithm <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
239<\/td>\n | G.2.2 Sample Application of the Algorithm G.2.2.1 Generation of Realizations Using Full-Rank Covariance Matrices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
243<\/td>\n | G.2.2.2 Generation of Realizations Using Non-Full-Rank Covariance Matrices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
246<\/td>\n | G.2.3 Matlab Code <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
248<\/td>\n | G.3 Simplified Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
250<\/td>\n | 22-V1_Appendix H_Fragility Development_Final_508 H.1 Introduction H.1.1 Fragility Function Definition <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
252<\/td>\n | H.1.2 Methods of Derivation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
253<\/td>\n | H.1.3 Documentation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
254<\/td>\n | H.2 Derivation of Fragility Parameters H.2.1 Actual Demand Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
255<\/td>\n | H.2.2 Bounding Demand Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
258<\/td>\n | H.2.3 Capable Demand Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
259<\/td>\n | H.2.4 Derivation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
260<\/td>\n | H.2.5 Expert Opinion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
261<\/td>\n | H.2.6 Updating Fragility Functions with New Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
262<\/td>\n | H.3 Assessing Fragility Function Quality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
263<\/td>\n | H.3.1 Competing Demand Parameters H.3.2 Elimination of Outliers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
264<\/td>\n | H.3.3 Goodness-of-Fit Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
265<\/td>\n | H.3.4 Adjusting Fragility Functions that Cross <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
266<\/td>\n | H.3.5 Fragility Function Quality Levels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
267<\/td>\n | 23-V1_Appendix I_Rugged Components_Final_508 I.1 Rugged Components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | 24-V1_Appendix J_Incremental Dynamic Analysis_Final_508 J.1 Introduction J.2 Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
270<\/td>\n | J.3 Mathematical Models J.4 Ground Motion Selection and Scaling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
271<\/td>\n | J.4.1 Uniform Hazard Spectrum J.4.2 Conditional Mean Spectrum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
272<\/td>\n | J.5 Collapse Fragility Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
274<\/td>\n | 25-V1_Appendix K_Sliding and Overturning_Final_508 K.1 Introduction K.2 Overturning <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
277<\/td>\n | K.3 Sliding <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" FEMA P-58-1 – Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings – Volume 1 – Methodology<\/b><\/p>\n |