FEMA P 2090 2021
$51.35
FEMA P-2090: Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
FEMA | 2021 | 138 |
None
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
7 | Executive Summary |
13 | Table of Contents |
17 | List of Figures |
19 | List of Tables |
21 | Introduction 1.1 Congressional Mandate |
22 | 1.2 Approach 1.3 Report Organization and Content |
25 | 1.4 Motivation for Change |
29 | 1.5 Community Resilience |
30 | 1.6 Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery |
32 | 1.6.1 Reoccupancy Defined 1.6.2 Functional Recovery Defined |
33 | 1.6.3 Description of a Target Recovery-Based Performance State |
34 | 1.7 Advancement in Design Capabilities |
37 | 1.8 Costs and Benefits 1.8.1 Costs of Action |
38 | 1.8.2 Benefits of Action |
41 | Framework for Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery RECOMMENDATION 1: Develop a Framework for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Objectives |
42 | Task 1.1: Develop a Policy for Recovery-Based Objectives |
43 | Task 1.2: Develop Design Criteria for Achieving Recovery-Based Objectives |
44 | Task 1.3: Determine Appropriate Hazard Levels for Recovery-Based Objectives |
47 | Improve the Performance of Buildings |
48 | RECOMMENDATION 2: Design New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
50 | Alternative 2-1: Mandate the Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Using Future National Model Code Provisions Alternative 2-2: Mandate the Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Using Interim Provisions Alternative 2-3: Encourage the Voluntary Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives RECOMMENDATION 3: Retrofit Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
53 | Alternative 3-1: Mandate the Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
54 | Alternative 3-2: Trigger the Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
55 | Alternative 3-3: Encourage the Voluntary Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
57 | Improve the Performance of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems |
59 | RECOMMENDATION 4: Design, Upgrade, and Maintain Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
61 | Task 4.1: Provide National Guidance on Regulatory Authority Across Lifeline Infrastructure Sectors Task 4.2: Evaluate the Ability of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
62 | Task 4.3: Develop National Seismic Design Standards to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives for Lifeline Infrastructure Systems |
64 | Task 4.4: Create Regional Lifelines Councils |
65 | Alternative 4-1: Mandate the Design of New and Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Alternative 4-2: Encourage the Voluntary Design of New and Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
66 | Alternative 4-3: Trigger the Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives |
67 | Expedite Recovery through Pre-Disaster Planning and Implementation |
68 | RECOMMENDATION 5: Develop and Implement Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning Focused on Recovery-Based Objectives Task 5.1: Develop and Implement Pre-Disaster Recovery Plans |
70 | Task 5.2: Create and Promote Seismic Continuity Programs |
71 | Task 5.3: Expand and Improve Criteria, Guidelines, and Procedures for Post-Earthquake Assessments and Evaluations |
73 | Task 5.4: Plan for Sufficient Staffing to Expedite Post-Earthquake Recovery |
74 | Task 5.5: Develop and Implement Building Occupancy Resumption Programs |
75 | Task 5.6: Develop Alternative Standards for Temporary Habitability to Facilitate Reoccupancy |
77 | Enable Action with Education and Financial Resources RECOMMENDATION 6: Provide Education and Outreach to Enhance Awareness and Understanding of Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives |
78 | Task 6.1: Educate Building and Lifeline Infrastructure System Stakeholders about Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives |
79 | Task 6.2: Educate Design and Construction Industry Professionals about Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives |
80 | RECOMMENDATION 7: Facilitate Access to Financial Resources Needed to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives |
81 | Task 7.1: Develop and Deploy Pre-Disaster Financial Mechanisms to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives |
83 | Task 7.2: Develop and Deploy Post-Disaster Financial Mechanisms to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives |
87 | Assessment and Conclusions 7.1 Qualitative Assessment of Recommendations and Alternatives |
90 | 7.2 Stakeholder Roles |
92 | 7.3 A Path Forward |
94 | 7.4 Conclusions |
97 | Process and Approach A.1 Committee of Experts |
98 | A.2 Stakeholder Workshops A.2.1 Workshop Participants |
99 | A.2.2 Workshop Objectives |
100 | A.2.3 Workshop Agenda A.2.4 Breakout Session 1: Functional Recovery Framework A.2.5 Breakout Sessions 2 and 3: Assessing and Evaluating Options |
102 | A.2.6 Workshop Takeaways |
105 | Supplemental Information on a Framework for Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery B.1 Conceptual Illustration of Recovery Categories |
106 | B.2 Damage Descriptions for Buildings and Lifeline Infrastructure Systems Meeting Different Target Functional Recovery Times |
109 | Supplemental Information on Lifeline Infrastructure Systems C.1 Summary of Topics Identified in the NEHRP Lifelines Roadmap |
111 | C.2 Possible Tasks for a New National Lifelines Organization |
113 | Supplemental Information on Pre-Disaster Planning and Implementation D.1 Examples of Seismic Continuity Programs |
114 | D.2 Examples of Assessment and Evaluation Guidelines |
115 | D.3 Seismic Instrumentation and Other Smart Technologies |
116 | D.4 Examples of Building Occupancy Resumption Programs and Other Similar Programs |
119 | References |
131 | Participants |
136 | Blank Page |
137 | Blank Page |