ASCE 9780784409213 2007
$53.63
Interpreting Construction Contracts
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASCE | 2007 | 470 |
Thomas and Ellis discuss the most troublesome contract clauses and present rules to construe them so as to avoid disputes that must be resolved in court.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
6 | Contents |
16 | Preface |
18 | Acknowledgments |
20 | Chapter 1. Introduction Objective Scope |
22 | How to Use This Book |
23 | Outline |
24 | Chapter 2. Basic Concepts The Appellate Process |
26 | Fact-Sensitive |
27 | Hierarchy of Documents and Rules Consistency Equity |
28 | Reference |
29 | Chapter 3. What Is a Contract? |
30 | Formation Principles |
33 | Form |
34 | Exercise 3-1: Rosen & Morelli and Kreisler Borg |
35 | References Additional Cases |
36 | Chapter 4. Fundamental Principles Common-Law Rules Procedural Interpretation Rules |
45 | Operational Interpretation Rules |
54 | References |
56 | Chapter 5. Types of Changes and Disputes Identifying the Type of Dispute |
57 | Bilateral Change vs. Unilateral Change |
58 | Cardinal Changes Minor Changes Change Orders |
60 | Constructive Changes |
61 | Examples Exercise 5-1: Diamond and the U.S. Assay Office |
64 | Exercise 5-2: Grand Forks and Moorhead Construction |
67 | Reference |
68 | Chapter 6. Notice Requirements Contract Language |
69 | Background |
72 | Rules of Application |
82 | Other Issues |
86 | Illustrative Example |
89 | Exercise 6-1: Granger Contracting and Chiappisi Brothers |
91 | Exercise 6-2: Linneman Construction and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. |
93 | Exercise 6-3: Acchione & Canuso and PennDOT |
94 | Exercise 6-4: McKeny Construction and Rowlesburg, W.V. |
95 | Exercise 6-5: Northern Improvement Co. and South Dakota State Highway Commission |
97 | Exercise 6-6: Federico Co. and Commonwealth of Massachusetts |
98 | References |
99 | Additional Cases |
100 | Chapter 7.Extra Work and Oral Change Orders Contract Language |
101 | Background |
103 | Rules of Application |
115 | Other Issues |
116 | Illustrative Example |
120 | Exercise 7-1: Long and Lazer Construction Co. |
121 | Exercise 7-2: Henry’s Electric Co. and Marilyn Apartments |
122 | Exercise 7-3: Laramee and Care Systems Exercise 7-4: Owens Plumbing & Heating and Bartlett, Kans. |
123 | Exercise 7-5: Utah DOT and Thorn Construction Co. |
124 | Exercise 7-6: Security Painting Co. and PennDOT |
125 | References |
126 | Additional Cases |
127 | Chapter 8. Rules for Contract Interpretation Contract Language |
128 | Rules of Application |
145 | Rule against the Drafter |
146 | The Order-of-Precedence Clause |
147 | Illustrative Example |
151 | Exercise 8-1: Barash and New York |
152 | Exercise 8-2: Long and Lazer Construction Co. |
153 | Exercise 8-3: W. H. Armstrong & Co. and U.S. Government |
154 | Exercise 8-4: R. B. Wright Construction Co. and U.S. |
156 | Exercise 8-5: Lyon Metal Products and Kaiser Construction Co. |
158 | Exercise 8-6: Lancaster Area Sewer Authority and Environmental Utilities Corp. |
161 | Exercise 8-7: Metro Insulation Corp. and Boston Housing Authority |
163 | Exercise 8-8: Foothill Junior College District and Jasper Construction Co. |
164 | Exercise 8-9: Western Contracting Corp. and Georgia State Highway Department |
165 | Exercise 8-10: Jacksonville State University, Dawson Construction Co., and Bob Roberts Co. |
167 | Exercise 8-11: Security Painting Co. and PennDOT |
169 | Exercise 8-12: D’Annunzio Brothers and NJT |
170 | Exercise 8-13: Blake Construction Co. and U.S. Navy |
172 | Exercise 8-14: Farrell-Cheek Steel Co. and Forest Construction Co. Exercise 8-15: Granger Contracting Co. and Chiappisi Brothers |
174 | Exercise 8-16: J. A. Jones Construction Co. and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
178 | References Additional Cases |
179 | Chapter 9. Differing Site Conditions Contract Language |
180 | Background |
182 | Rules of Application |
193 | Type II Condition |
195 | Other Issues |
196 | Illustrative Example |
198 | Exercise 9-1: Blauner Construction Co. and U.S. Treasury |
200 | Exercise 9-2: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Stuyvesant Dredging Co. |
203 | Exercise 9-3: Morrison & Lamping and State of Oregon |
206 | Exercise 9-4: Umpqua River Navigation Co. and Western Pacific Dredging Corp. |
209 | Exercise 9-5: Grand Forks, N.D., and Moorhead Construction Co. |
212 | Exercise 9-6: Western Contracting Corp. and California Department of Water Resources |
213 | Exercise 9-7: P. J. Maffei Building & Wrecking Corp. and U.S. Government |
214 | Exercise 9-8: Carlos Teodori and Penn Hills School District Authority |
216 | References |
218 | Additional Cases |
219 | Chapter 10. Misrepresentations Contract Language |
220 | Background |
221 | Rules of Application |
237 | Relevant Information Withheld |
241 | Illustrative Example |
244 | Other Issues |
246 | Exercise 10-1: J. A. Thompson & Son and State of Hawaii |
247 | Exercise 10-2: Williams-McWilliams Co., Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co., and U.S. Government |
251 | Exercise 10-3: P. T. & L. Construction Co. and State of New Jersey |
254 | Exercise 10-4: Charlotte, N.C., and Ruby-Collins |
257 | Exercise 10-5: Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and York Engineering & Construction Co. |
259 | Exercise 10-6: Utah DOT and Thorn Construction Co. |
260 | Exercise 10-7: Indianapolis and Twin Lakes Enterprises |
261 | Exercise 10-8: Post & Front Properties and Roanoke Construction Co. Exercise 10-9: Ideker Corp. and Missouri State Highway Commission |
263 | Exercise 10-10: Waldinger Corp. and Daniel Hamm Drayage Co. |
265 | Exercise 10-11: Pinkerton & Laws Co. and Roadway Express |
269 | Exercise 10-12: Flippin Materials Co. and U.S. Government |
271 | Exercise 10-13: Public Constructors and State of New York Department of Public Works |
272 | Exercise 10-14: E. H. Morrill Co. and California Department of Public Works |
274 | References |
275 | Additional Case |
276 | Chapter 11. Defective Specifications Contract Language |
277 | Background |
278 | Rules of Application |
290 | Performance Specifications |
295 | Illustrative Example |
297 | Exercise 11-1: Blount Brothers and U.S. Government |
298 | Exercise 11-2: Marine Colloids and M. D. Hardy |
300 | Exercise 11-3: Western Foundation Corp. and Veterans Administration |
302 | Exercise 11-4: J. D. Hedin Construction Co. and Veterans Administration 1 |
305 | Exercise 11-5: J. D. Hedin Construction Co. and Veterans Administration 2 |
308 | Exercise 11-6: Weston Racquet Club and Republic Floors of New England |
310 | Exercise 11-7: Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals and Newman Glass Works |
311 | Exercise 11-8: ALTL and The Architectural Group |
312 | References |
314 | Additional Cases |
315 | Chapter 12. The No-Damages-for-Delay Clause Contract Language |
317 | Judicial Attitude Rules of Application |
327 | Illustrative Examples |
330 | References |
331 | Additional Cases |
332 | Chapter 13. Substantial Completion Contract Language |
333 | Background Significance of Substantial Completion |
336 | Evolution of Substantial Completion |
337 | Primary Rules of Inquiry |
343 | Certificate of Substantial Completion |
344 | Illustrative Examples |
346 | References |
347 | Additional Case |
348 | Chapter 14. Liquidated Damages Contract Language |
349 | Background |
350 | Basic Principles of the Liquidated-Damages Clause |
353 | Primary Rules of Application |
356 | Strategy |
357 | Illustrative Examples |
360 | Exercise 14-1: S. J. Otinger Construction Co. and Montgomery, Ala., Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board |
361 | References |
362 | Appendix A: Additional Exercises Exercise 1 |
364 | Exercise 2 |
366 | Exercise 3 |
371 | Exercise 4 |
373 | Exercise 5 |
378 | Exercise 6 |
381 | Exercise 7 |
387 | Appendix B: Exercise Solutions Solution: Exercise 3-1 |
388 | Solution: Exercise 6-1 |
389 | Solution: Exercise 6-2 |
391 | Solution: Exercise 6-3 |
392 | Solution: Exercise 6-4 |
393 | Solution: Exercixe 6-5 |
394 | Solution: Exercise 6-6 |
395 | Solution: Exercise 7-1 |
396 | Solution: Exercise 7-2 |
397 | Solution: Exercise 7-3 |
399 | Solution: Exercise 7-4 |
400 | Solution: Exercise 7-5 |
401 | Solution: Exercise 7-6 |
402 | Solution: Exercise 8-1 |
403 | Solution: Exercise 8-2 |
404 | Solution: Exercise 8-3 |
406 | Solution: Exercise 8-4 |
407 | Solution: Exercise 8-5 |
408 | Solution: Exercise 8-6 |
409 | Solution: Exercise 8-7 |
410 | Solution: Exercise 8-8 |
411 | Solution: Exercise 8-9 |
413 | Solution: Exercise 8-10 |
414 | Solution: Exercise 8-11 |
415 | Solution: Exercise 8-12 |
416 | Solution: Exercise 8-13 |
417 | Solution: Exercise 8-14 |
418 | Solution: Exercise 8-15 |
419 | Solution: Exercise 8-16 |
420 | Solution: Exercise 9-1 |
421 | Solution: Exercise 9-2 |
422 | Solution: Exercise 9-3 |
423 | Solution: Exercise 9-4 |
424 | Solution: Exercise 9-5 Solution: Exercise 9-6 |
425 | Solution: Exercise 9-7 |
426 | Solution: Exercise 9-8 |
427 | Solution: Exercise 10-1 |
428 | Solution: Exercise 10-2 |
430 | Solution: Exercise 10-3 |
431 | Solution: Exercise 10-4 |
432 | Solution: Exercise 10-5 |
433 | Solution: Exercise 10-6 |
434 | Solution: Exercise 10-7 |
435 | Solution: Exercise 10-8 |
436 | Solution: Exercise 10-9 |
437 | Solution: Exercise 10-10 |
438 | Solution: Exercise 10-11 |
439 | Solution: Exercise 10-12 |
440 | Solution: Exercise 10-13 |
441 | Solution: Exercise 10-14 |
442 | Solution: Exercise 11-1 |
443 | Solution: Exercise 11-2 |
444 | Solution: Exercise 11-3 |
446 | Solution: Exercise 11-4 |
447 | Solution: Exercise 11-5 |
448 | Solution: Exercise 11-6 |
449 | Solution: Exercise 11-7 |
450 | Solution: Exercise 11-8 |
452 | Case Table |
460 | Index A B C |
462 | D |
463 | E F G H |
464 | I J |
465 | K L M |
466 | N O |
467 | P R S |
468 | T U V W |
469 | Y |
470 | About the Authors |