ASME B31.8S 2020
$98.04
ASME B31.8S – 2020 Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASME | 2020 |
ASME’s B31.8S Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines covers on-shore, gas pipeline systems constructed with ferrous materials, including pipe, valves, appurtenances attached to pipe, compressor units, metering stations, regulator stations, delivery stations, holders and fabricated assemblies. Its principles, processes and approaches apply to the entire system for all pipeline systems. B31.8S is specifically designed to provide the operator with the information necessary to develop and implement an effective integrity management program utilizing proven industry practices and processes. Effective system management can decrease repair and replacement costs, prevent malfunctions, and minimize system downtime. Key changes to this version include updates to the potential impact area requirements section and non-mandatory appendix A. Intended for manufacturers, users, constructors, designers, and others concerned with the design, fabrication, assembly, erection, examination, inspection, and testing of piping, plus all potential governing entities.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | CONTENTS |
6 | FOREWORD |
7 | ASME B31 COMMITTEE ROSTER |
10 | CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE B31 COMMITTEE |
12 | ASME B31.8S-2020 SUMMARY OF CHANGES |
14 | 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose and Objectives 1.3 Integrity Management Principles |
15 | 1.4 Units of Measure 2 INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW 2.1 General |
16 | Figures Figure 2.1-1 Integrity Management Program Elements |
17 | Figure 2.1-2 Integrity Management Plan Process Flow Diagram |
18 | 2.2 Integrity Threat Classification 2.3 The Integrity Management Process |
20 | 2.4 Integrity Management Program 3 CONSEQUENCES 3.1 General |
21 | 3.2 Potential Impact Area |
22 | 3.3 Consequence Factors to Consider 4 GATHERING, REVIEWING, AND INTEGRATING DATA 4.1 General 4.2 Data Requirements Figure 3.2.4-1 Potential Impact Area |
23 | 4.3 Data Sources Tables Table 4.2.1-1 Data Elements for Prescriptive Pipeline Integrity Program |
24 | 4.4 Data Collection, Review, and Analysis 4.5 Data Integration Table 4.3-1 Typical Data Sources for Pipeline Integrity Program |
25 | 5 RISK ASSESSMENT 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Definition 5.3 Risk Assessment Objectives 5.4 Developing a Risk Assessment Approach |
26 | 5.5 Risk Assessment Approaches |
27 | 5.6 Risk Analysis Table 5.6.1-1 Integrity Assessment Intervals: Time-Dependent Threats, Internal and External Corrosion, Prescriptive Integrity Management Plan |
28 | 5.7 Characteristics of an Effective Risk Assessment Approach |
29 | 5.8 Risk Estimates Using Assessment Methods 5.9 Data Collection for Risk Assessment 5.10 Prioritization for Prescriptive-Based and Performance-Based Integrity Management Programs |
30 | 5.11 Integrity Assessment and Mitigation 5.12 Validation 6 INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT 6.1 General |
31 | 6.2 Pipeline In-Line Inspection |
33 | 6.3 Pressure Testing 6.4 Direct Assessment |
34 | 6.5 Other Integrity Assessment Methodologies 7 RESPONSES TO INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS AND MITIGATION (REPAIR AND PREVENTION) 7.1 General |
35 | 7.2 Responses to Pipeline In-Line Inspections |
36 | Table 7.1-1 Acceptable Threat Prevention and Repair Methods |
39 | Figure 7.2.1-1 Timing for Scheduled Responses: Time-Dependent Threats, Prescriptive Integrity Management Plan |
40 | 7.3 Responses to Pressure Testing 7.4 Responses to Direct Assessment Inspections 7.5 Timing for Scheduled Responses 7.6 Repair Methods 7.7 Prevention Strategy/Methods |
41 | 7.8 Prevention Options 8 INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 8.1 General 8.2 Updating the Plan |
42 | 8.3 Plan Framework 9 PERFORMANCE PLAN 9.1 Introduction |
43 | Table 8.3.4-1 Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment (Segment Data: Line 1, Segment 3) Table 8.3.4-2 Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment (Integrity Assessment Plan: Line 1, Segment 3) |
44 | 9.2 Performance Measures Characteristics 9.3 Performance Measurement Methodology 9.4 Performance Measurement: Intrasystem Table 8.3.4-3 Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment (Mitigation Plan: Line 1, Segment 3) |
45 | Table 9.2.3-1 Performance Measures |
46 | Table 9.4-1 Performance Metrics |
47 | 9.5 Performance Measurement: Industry Based 9.6 Performance Improvement 10 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 11 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PLAN Table 9.4-2 Overall Performance Measures |
48 | 12 QUALITY CONTROL PLAN |
49 | 13 TERMS, DEFINITIONS, AND ACRONYMS Figure 13-1 Hierarchy of Terminology for Integrity Assessment |
55 | 14 REFERENCES AND STANDARDS |
58 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A THREAT PROCESS CHARTS AND PRESCRIPTIVE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLANS A-1 INTRODUCTION A-2 EXTERNAL CORROSION THREAT |
59 | Figure A-2.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, External Corrosion Threat (Simplified Process: Prescriptive) |
60 | A-3 INTERNAL CORROSION THREAT |
61 | Figure A-3.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Internal Corrosion Threat (Simplified Process: Prescriptive) |
62 | A-4 STRESS CORROSION CRACKING THREAT |
64 | Table A-4.4-1 SCC Crack Severity Criteria Table A-4.4.1-1 Actions Following Discovery of SCC During Excavation |
65 | Figure A-5.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Manufacturing Threat (Pipe Seam and Pipe; Simplified Process: Prescriptive) A-5 MANUFACTURING THREAT (PIPE SEAM AND PIPE) |
67 | Figure A-6.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Construction Threat (Pipe Girth Weld, Fabrication Weld, Wrinkle Bend or Buckle, Stripped Threads/Broken Pipe/Coupling; Simplified Process: Prescriptive) A-6 CONSTRUCTION THREAT (PIPE GIRTH WELD, FABRICATION WELD, WRINKLE BEND OR BUCKLE, STRIPPED THREADS/BROKEN PIPE/COUPLING) |
68 | A-7 EQUIPMENT THREAT (GASKETS AND O-RINGS, CONTROL/RELIEF, SEAL/PUMP PACKING) |
69 | Figure A-7.1-1 IntegrityManagementPlan, Equipment Threat (GasketandO-Ring, Control/Relief, Seal/PumpPacking; Simplified Process: Prescriptive) |
70 | A-8 THIRD-PARTY DAMAGE THREAT [THIRD-PARTY INFLICTED DAMAGE (IMMEDIATE), VANDALISM, PREVIOUSLY DAMAGED PIPE] |
71 | Figure A-8.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Third-Party Damage Threat [Third-Party Inflicted Damage (Immediate), Vandalism, Previously Damaged Pipe; Simplified Process: Prescriptive] |
72 | A-9 INCORRECT OPERATIONS THREAT A-10 WEATHER-RELATED AND OUTSIDE-FORCE THREAT (EARTH MOVEMENT, HEAVY RAINS OR FLOODS, COLD WEATHER, LIGHTNING) |
73 | Figure A-9.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Incorrect Operations Threat (Simplified Process: Prescriptive) |
74 | Figure A-10.1-1 Integrity Management Plan, Weather-Related and Outside-Force Threat (Earth Movement, Heavy Rains or Floods, Cold Weather, Lightning; Simplified Process: Prescriptive) |
76 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX B DIRECT ASSESSMENT PROCESS B-1 GENERAL B-2 EXTERNAL CORROSION DIRECT ASSESSMENT B-3 INTERNAL CORROSION DIRECT ASSESSMENT |
77 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX C PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL INQUIRIES |