ASME PCC 3 2017
$98.04
ASME PCC-3-2017 Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASME | 2017 | 94 |
The risk analysis principles, guidance, and implementation strategies presented in this Standard are broadly applicable; however, this Standard has been specifically developed for applications involving fixed pressure-containing equipment and components. This Standard is not intended to be used for nuclear power plant components; see ASME BPV, Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components. It provides guidance to owners, operators, and designers of pressure-containing equipment for developing and implementing an inspection program. These guidelines include means for assessing an inspection program and its plan. The approach emphasizes safe and reliable operation through cost-effective inspection. A spectrum of complimentary risk analysis approaches (qualitative through fully quantitative) should be considered as part of the inspection planning process.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | CONTENTS |
6 | FOREWORD |
7 | ASME POST CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE ROSTER |
8 | CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE POST CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE |
10 | ASME PCC-3-2017 SUMMARY OF CHANGES |
12 | 1 SCOPE, INTRODUCTION, AND PURPOSE 1.1 Scope 1.2 Introduction 1.3 Purpose 1.4 Relationship to Regulatory and Jurisdictional Requirements 2 BASIC CONCEPTS 2.1 Risk |
13 | 2.2 Overview of Risk Analysis Figures Fig. 2.1 Risk Plot |
14 | 2.3 Inspection Optimization Fig. 2.3 Management of Risk Using RBI Table 2.3 Factors Contributing to Loss of Containment |
15 | 3 INTRODUCTION TO RISK-BASED INSPECTION 3.1 Items RBI Will Not Compensate for 3.2 Consequence and Probability for Risk-Based Inspection 3.3 Risk Analysis Methodology |
16 | Fig. 3.3.1 Continuum of RBI Approaches |
17 | 3.4 Understanding How RBI Helps to Manage Operating Risks |
18 | 3.5 Inspection Plan 3.6 Management of Risks Fig. 3.3.4 Risk-Based Inspection Planning Process |
19 | 3.7 Relationship Between RBI and Other Risk-Based and Safety Initiatives 3.8 Relationship With Jurisdictional Requirements |
20 | 4 PLANNING THE RISK ANALYSIS 4.1 Getting Started 4.2 Outcome of the Planning Portion of the Process 4.3 Establish Objectives |
21 | 4.4 Initial Screening |
22 | Fig. 4.4.1 Relationship Among Component, Equipment, System, Process Unit, and Facility |
24 | 4.5 Selecting a Risk Analysis Approach 4.6 Estimating Resources and Time Required |
25 | 5 DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTION 5.1 Introduction 5.2 General 5.3 Data Needs and Common Types of Data |
26 | 5.4 Data Quality and Validation |
27 | 6 DAMAGE MECHANISMS AND FAILURE MODES 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Identification of Damage Mechanisms 6.3 Damage Mechanisms |
28 | 6.4 Failure Modes 6.5 Accumulated Damage 6.6 Tabulating Results 7 DETERMINING PROBABILITY OF FAILURE 7.1 Introduction to Probability Analysis |
29 | 7.2 Determination of Probability of Failure |
31 | 7.3 Units of Measure for Probability of Failure Analysis 7.4 Types of Probability Analysis |
32 | 8 DETERMINING CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE 8.1 Introduction to Consequence Analysis 8.2 Other Functional Failures 8.3 Types of Consequences and Units of Measure |
34 | Tables Table 8.3.5-1 Three-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories Table 8.3.5-2 Six-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories Table 8.3.7 Six-Level Table |
35 | 8.4 Analysis of the Consequence of Failure |
36 | 8.5 Determination of Consequence of Failure |
37 | Fig. 8.5 Determination of Consequence of Failure |
38 | 8.6 Volume of Fluid Released 8.7 Hazard Categories |
39 | 9 RISK DETERMINATION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Determination of Risk |
40 | 9.3 Assumptions 9.4 Sensitivity Analysis 9.5 Risk Communication |
41 | Fig. 9.2.1 Example of Calculating the Probability of a Specific Consequence |
42 | Fig. 9.5.1 Example Risk Matrix Using Probability and Consequence Categories |
43 | 9.6 Establishing Acceptable Risk Thresholds 9.7 Risk Management 10 RISK MANAGEMENT WITH INSPECTION ACTIVITIES 10.1 Managing Risk by Reducing Uncertainty Through Inspection |
44 | 10.2 Identifying Opportunities for Risk Reduction From RBI and Probability of Failure Results 10.3 Establishing an Inspection Strategy Based on Risk Analysis 10.4 Managing Risk With Inspection Activities |
45 | 10.5 Managing Inspection Costs With RBI 10.6 Assessing Inspection Results and Determining Corrective Action |
46 | 10.7 Achieving Lowest Life Cycle Costs With RBI 11 OTHER RISK MITIGATION ACTIVITIES 11.1 General 11.2 Equipment Replacement and Repair 11.3 Fitness-for-Service Assessment 11.4 Equipment Modification, Redesign, and Rerating 11.5 Emergency Isolation 11.6 Emergency Depressurizing/De-inventory |
47 | 11.7 Modify Process 11.8 Reduce Inventory 11.9 Water Spray/Deluge 11.10 Water Curtain 11.11 Blast-Resistant Construction 11.12 Other Mitigation Activities 12 REANALYSIS 12.1 Introduction |
48 | 12.2 When to Conduct RBI Reanalysis 13 ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, TRAINING, AND QUALIFICATIONS 13.1 Interdisciplinary Approach 13.2 RBI Team Roles and Responsibilities |
49 | 13.3 Training and Qualifications |
50 | 14 DOCUMENTATION AND RECORD KEEPING 14.1 General |
51 | 15 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS 15.1 Definitions |
52 | 15.2 Acronyms 16 REFERENCES |
53 | Table 16-1 Reference Documents |
56 | Table 16-2 Procurement Information |
58 | NONMANDATORY APPENDICES NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A DAMAGE MECHANISM DEFINITIONS |
59 | Table A-1 Damage Mechanism Definitions |
69 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX B DAMAGE MECHANISM AND DEFECTS SCREENING TABLE |
76 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX C TABLE OF EXAMINATION/MONITORING METHODS |
82 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX D QUANTITATIVE METHODS INCLUDING EXPERT OPINION ELICITATION D-1 INTRODUCTION D-2 QUANTITATIVE PROBABILITY ANALYSIS D-2.1 Definition D-2.2 Approaches to Quantitative Probability Analysis D-2.2.1 Objective Approach. D-2.2.2 Subjective Approach. D-2.3 Rules of Probability D-3 FAULT TREE/EVENT TREE/DECISION TREE D-3.1 Tree Structures D-3.1.1 Event Tree. D-3.1.2 Fault Tree. D-3.1.3 Decision Tree. |
83 | D-3.2 Event Trees Versus Fault Trees D-3.3 Fault/Event Tree Construction D-3.3.1 Components of Event and Fault Trees D-3.4 Decision Trees D-4 MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD D-4.1 Definition D-4.2 Methodology D-4.3 Components |
84 | Fig. D-4.3 Process of Performing a Monte Carlo Simulation D-4.4 Inputs D-4.5 Requirements D-4.5.1 Probability of Failure With Time. D-4.5.2 Probabilistic Simulation of Failure. D-4.5.3 Failure Criterion. D-4.5.4 Present Damage State From NDE. D-4.5.5 Operating Environment. D-4.5.6 Damage Rate Model. |
85 | Fig. D-5.1 Probability of Failure Rate vs. Time D-4.5.7 Damage Mechanism. D-5 LIFETIME RELIABILITY MODELS D-5.1 Population Lifetime D-5.2 Periods of the Bathtub Curve D-5.2.1 Infant Mortality. D-5.2.2 Constant Failure Rate. D-5.2.3 Wear-Out Period. D-5.3 Weibull Distribution |
86 | D-6 GENERIC FAILURE CURVES D-6.1 Generic Databases D-6.2 Generic Versus Specific Databases D-6.2.1 Specific Databases. D-6.3 Updating Specific and Generic Data D-6.3.1 Combining Data. D-6.3.2 BayesŒ Theorem. D-7 EXPERT ELICITATION AND INTUITIVE OPINION D-7.1 Description of Process D-7.2 Characteristics of the Expert Elicitation Process D-7.2.1 Availability. D-7.2.2 Unanchoring. D-7.3 Methods of Elicitation D-7.3.1 Indirect Intuitive. D-7.3.2 Direct. D-7.3.3 Parametric Estimation. D-7.4 Indirect or Intuitive Opinion Interview Techniques1 D-7.4.1 Plant Personnel Intuition. |
87 | D-7.4.2 Interview Steps. D-7.4.3 Team Approach. D-7.4.4 Interview Process. D-7.4.5 Time Estimate to Failure. D-7.4.6 Determine Relative Probability of Failure. |
88 | D-7.4.7 Probability of Failure by Time Increment. D-7.4.8 Summary of Steps D-7.5 Direct or Cognitive Expert Elicitation Interview Techniques2 D-7.5.1 Delphi Method. D-7.5.2 Questions. D-7.5.3 Combination of Probabilities. D-8 ASPECTS OF FULLY QUANTITATIVE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS D-8.1 Definition |
89 | D-8.2 Consequence When Few Components D-8.3 Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence D-8.4 Probability Distributions |
90 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX E EXAMPLES OF RISK-BASED INSPECTION PROGRAM AUDIT QUESTIONS E-1 INTRODUCTION E-2 RBI PROGRAM REVIEW E-3 INSPECTION PROGRAM TEAM STAFFING |
91 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX F SUGGESTED PRACTICE FOR EVALUATION OF PRESSURE VESSELS FOR CONTINUED CYCLIC SERVICE F-1 GENERAL F-2 DATA AND RECORDS FOR OPERATION BEYOND CYCLIC DESIGN LIMITS |
92 | F-3 EXAMINATION FREQUENCY AND DISPOSITION OF RESULTS F-4 EXEMPTION FROM EXAMINATION F-5 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS F-6 VESSELS WITH LAYERED SHELLS F-7 EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES |