ASME PTC 46 96 1996
$98.04
ASME PTC 46 Performance Test Code on Overall Plant Performance
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASME | 1996 | 202 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | Foreword |
6 | Standards Committee Roster |
8 | Contents |
10 | 0 Introduction |
12 | 1 Object and Scope |
13 | 1.1 Largest Expected Test Uncertainties |
14 | 2 Definitions and Description of Terms |
16 | 3 Guiding Principles |
17 | 3.1 Generic Test Boundary 3.2 Typical Steam Plant Test Boundary |
18 | 3.3 Typical Combined Cycle Plant Test Boundary |
21 | 3.1 Design, Construction, and Start-up Considerations |
26 | 3.2 Guidance for Establishing Permissible Deviations From Design |
28 | 3.3 Typical Pretest Stabilization Periods 3.4 Recommended Minimum Test Run Durations |
29 | 3.4 Three Post-Test Cases |
32 | 4 Instruments and Methods of Measurement |
37 | 4.1 Five-Way Manifold |
39 | 4.2 Four-Wire RTDs 4.3 Three-Wire RTDs |
41 | 4.4 Flow-Through Well |
42 | 4.5 Duct Measurement Points |
49 | 4.6 Three-Wire Open Delta Connected Metering System |
50 | 4.7 Four-Wire Metering System |
53 | 4.8 Typical Correction Curve |
56 | 5 Calculations and Results |
57 | 5.1 Summary of Additive Correction Factors in Fundamental Performance Equations |
58 | 5.2 Summary of Multiplicative Correction Factors in Fundamental Performance Equations |
60 | 5.3 Examples of Typical Cycles and Test Objectives – Corresponding Specific Performance Equations |
63 | 5.1 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction factor ***5A or ***5A |
64 | 5.2 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction Factor ***5B or ***5B |
65 | 5.3 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant or Thermal Island Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction Factor ***5C or ***5C |
68 | 5.4 Change in Compressor Inlet Temperature over a 30% Range in Evaporator Cooler Effectiveness on a 80 deg F Day, with 80% Relative Humidity |
70 | 5.5 Required Test Series for Phased Construction Combined Cycle Plants. |
71 | 5.4 Output Versus Throttle Steam Flow |
72 | 5.5 Steam Turbine Plant Test Boundary |
74 | 6 Report of Results |
76 | A Sample Calculations Combined Cycle Cogeneration Plant Without Duct Firing Heat Sink: Completely Internal to Test the Boundary Test Goal: Specified Measurement Power- Fire to Desired Power Level by Duct Firing |
90 | B Sample Calculations Combined Cycle Cogeneration Plant With Duct Firing Heat Sink: External to the Test Boundary Test Goal: Specified Measurement Power- Fire to Desired Power Level by Duct Firing |
110 | C Sample Calculations Combined Cycle Cogeneration Plant Without Duct Firing Heat Sink: Cooling Tower External to the Test Boundary Test Goal: Specified Disposition is Gas Turbine Base Loaded (Power Floats) |
130 | D Representation of Correction for Different Heat Sink Temperature than Gas Turbine Air Inlet Temperature (***5 or ***5) if Necessary, for a Typical Combined Cycle Plant |
134 | E Sample Calculations Steam Power Cogeneration Plant Heat Sink: River Cooling Water Flow within Test Boundary Test Goal: Two Test Runs are Made with Different Goals Test Run 1: Specified Corrected Power- Fire to Desired Corrected Power Test Run 2: Specified Disposition by Firing to Desired Throttle Flow (Power Floats) |
186 | F Uncertainty Analysis |
190 | G Entering Air Conditions |
192 | H Energy Balance Method |
194 | I Solid Fuel and Ash Sampling |