ASME STP TS 084 2018
$98.04
ASME STP TS 084 2018 Orifice Flow Coefficient Equation Comparison
| Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
| ASME | 2018 | 93 |
Orifice Flow Coefficient Equation Comparison. Publisher: ASME Standards Technology LLC Publish Date: 2018 Pages: 93 Language: English ISBN: 9780791871782
PDF Catalog
| PDF Pages | PDF Title |
|---|---|
| 4 | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| 10 | FOREWORD |
| 11 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 13 | ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS |
| 14 | 1 DATABASE 1.1 Flange Tap Database |
| 15 | Tables Table 1-1: Contribution of Each Testing Facility to the Flange Tap Database Table 1-2: Fluids in the Flange Tap Database |
| 16 | Table 1-3: Location of Meter-Run Testing |
| 17 | 1.2 Meter-Run Orifice Plate Combinations Table 1-4: 2-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations |
| 18 | Table 1-5: 3-inch Meter-Run Plate Combination |
| 19 | Table 1-6: 4-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations |
| 20 | Table 1-7: 6-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations |
| 21 | Table 1-8: 10-inch Meter-Run Plat Combinations Table 1-9: 24-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations |
| 22 | 1.3 Distribution of Beta Ratios Figures Figure 1-1: Beta Ratio Distribution of all Data Figure 1-2: 2-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 23 | Figure 1-3: 3-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio Figure 1-4: 4-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 24 | Figure 1-5: 6-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio Figure 1-6: 10-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 25 | 1.4 Corner Tap Database Figure 1-7: 24-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 26 | Table 1-10: Contribution of Each Testing Facility to the Corner Tap Database Table 1-11: Fluids in the Corner Tap Database |
| 27 | 1.5 Distribution of Beta Ratios Figure 1-8: Beta Ratio Distribution of all Data Figure 1-9: 4-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 28 | Figure 1-10: 10-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio |
| 29 | 2 EQUATIONS 2.1 Flange Tap Equations 2.1.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) |
| 30 | 2.1.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) |
| 31 | 2.1.3 AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) |
| 32 | 2.1.4 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) 2.1.5 Comparison of Equations |
| 33 | Figure 2-6: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.10 Beta Ratio Figure 2-7: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.40 Beta Ratio |
| 34 | Figure 2-8: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 2-9: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 35 | Figure 2-10: Flange Tap Equations for 3-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-11: Flange Tap Equations for 4-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 36 | Figure 2-12: Flange Tap Equations for 6-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-13: Flange Tap Equations for 10-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 37 | 2.2 Corner Tap Equations Figure 2-14: Flange Tap Equations for 24-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 38 | 2.2.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) |
| 39 | 2.2.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) 2.2.3 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) |
| 40 | 2.2.4 Comparison of Equations Figure 2-18: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.10 Beta Ratio Figure 2-19: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.40 Beta Ratio |
| 41 | Figure 2-20: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.70 Beta Ratio |
| 42 | Figure 2-21: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-22: Corner Tap Equations for 3-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 43 | Figure 2-23: Corner Tap Equations for 4-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-24: Corner Tap Equations for 6-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 44 | Figure 2-25: Corner Tap Equations for 10-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-26: Corner Tap Equations for 24-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio |
| 45 | 3 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY |
| 47 | 3.1 Example of Methodology Table 3-1: Limits for Data Compiling in Example Table 3-2: First 6 Rows of Results in Example Table 3-3: Results of Analysis of Points that Met Criteria in Example |
| 48 | Figure 3-1: Graphical Representation of the Data in the Example Analysis |
| 49 | 4 RESULTS 4.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) 2004 Flange Tap Table 4-1: Number of Points Meeting ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Criteria |
| 50 | Table 4-2: Average Deviation Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 51 | Figure 4-1: 2-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Figure 4-2: 4-inch 0.40-0.45 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 52 | Table 4-3: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-4: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 53 | Table 4-5: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO- RHG) Flange Tap Equation Figure 4-3: 4-inch 0.50-0.55 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange TapEquation |
| 54 | 4.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Table 4-6: Number of Points Meeting ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Criteria Table 4-7: Average Deviation Results for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation |
| 55 | Table 4-8: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-9: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation |
| 56 | Table 4-10: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation |
| 57 | 4.3 AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Table 4-11: Number of Points Meeting AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Criteria |
| 58 | Table 4-12: Average Deviation Results for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 59 | Table 4-13: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-14: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 60 | Table 4-15: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation |
| 61 | 4.4 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Flange Tap Table 4-16: Number of Points Meeting PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Criteria |
| 62 | Table 4-17: Average Deviation Results for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Equation |
| 63 | Table 4-18: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-19: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Tap Equation |
| 64 | Table 4-20: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 |
| 65 | 4.5 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) 2004 Corner Tap Table 4-21: Number of Points Meeting ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Criteria |
| 66 | Table 4-22: Average Deviation Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-4: 4-inch 0.15-0.20 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation |
| 67 | Table 4-23: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation Table 4-24: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation |
| 68 | Table 4-25: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO- RHG) Corner Tap Equation |
| 69 | 4.6 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Table 4-26: Number of Points Meeting ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Criteria |
| 70 | Figure 4-27: Average Deviation Results for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation |
| 71 | Figure 4-28: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-29: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation |
| 72 | Figure 4-30: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation |
| 73 | 4.7 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Corner Tap Table 4-31: Number of Points Meeting PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Criteria |
| 74 | Figure 4-32: Average Deviation Results for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation |
| 75 | Figure 4-33: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-34: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation |
| 76 | Figure 4-35: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation forPTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation |
| 77 | 5 EXTRAPOLATION TESTING 5.1 Methodology Figure 5-1: Example of Extrapolation Comparison |
| 78 | 5.2 Flange Tap Equation Extrapolation 5.2.1 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-2: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-3: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 79 | 5.2.2 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-4: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-5: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 80 | 5.2.3 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-6: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-7: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 81 | 5.2.4 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-8: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-9: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 82 | 5.2.5 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-10: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-11: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 83 | 5.2.6 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-12: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-13: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 84 | 5.2.7 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-14: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-15: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 85 | 5.2.8 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-16: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-17: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 86 | 5.3 Corner Tap Equation Extrapolation 5.3.1 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-18: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation |
| 87 | 5.3.2 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-19: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-20: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation |
| 88 | 5.3.3 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-21: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-22: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation |
| 89 | 5.3.4 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-23: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-24: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation |
| 90 | Figure 5-25: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004(ISO-RHG) Equation |
| 91 | 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 6.1 Flange Tap Equations |
| 92 | 6.2 Corner Tap Equations |
Related products
-
ICC IFC CommentaryVol 1 2 2018 1stPrint
International Fire Code and Commentary Published By Publication Date Number of Pages ICC 2018 1603
