ASTM-C581:2003 Edition
$40.63
C581-03 Standard Practice for Determining Chemical Resistance of Thermosetting Resins Used in Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Structures Intended for Liquid Service
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASTM | 2003 | 5 |
ASTM C581-03
Historical Standard: Standard Practice for Determining Chemical Resistance of Thermosetting Resins Used in Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Structures Intended for Liquid Service
ASTM C581
Scope
1.1 This practice is designed to evaluate, in an unstressed state, the chemical resistance of thermosetting resins used in the fabrication of reinforced thermosetting plastic (RTP) laminates. This practice provides for the determination of changes in the properties, described as follows, of the test specimens and test reagent after exposure of the specimens to the reagent: hardness of specimens, weight change thickness, appearance of specimens, appearance of immersion media, and flexural strength and modulus.
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values in parentheses are given for information only.
Note 1āThis practice may also be used to evaluate other factors, such as surfacing veils, the effect of resin additives, and fabrication variables on the chemical resistance of the resin.
Note 2āThere is no similar or equivalent ISO standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Keywords
chemical resistance; glass-fiber-reinforced; glass-reinfoced plastic (GRP); laminate; liquid service; reinforced thermosetting plastic (RTP); reinforced thermosetting resins; thermosetting resins
ICS Code
ICS Number Code n/a
DOI: 10.1520/C0581-03
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | Scope Referenced Documents Significance and Use Apparatus |
2 | Reagents Test Specimens |
3 | Procedure Calculation |
4 | Interpretation of Results Report FIG. 1 |
5 | Precision and Bias Keywords |