Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

ASTM-D5912:2004 Edition

$35.75

D5912-96(2004) Standard Test Method for (Analytical Procedure) Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of an Unconfined Aquifer by Overdamped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug)

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ASTM 2004 4
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

ASTM D5912-96-Reapproved2004

Historical Standard: Standard Test Method for (Analytical Procedure) Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of an Unconfined Aquifer by Overdamped Well Response to Instantaneous Change in Head (Slug) (Withdrawn 2013)

ASTM D5912

Scope

1.1 This test method covers the determination of hydraulic conductivity from the measurement of inertial force free (overdamped) response of a well-aquifer system to a sudden change in water level in a well. Inertial force free response of the water level in a well to a sudden change in water level is characterized by recovery to initial water level in an approximate exponential manner with negligible inertial effects.

1.2 The analytical procedure in this test method is used in conjunction with the field procedure in Test Method D4044 for collection of test data.

1.3 LimitationsSlug tests are considered to provide an estimate of hydraulic conductivity. The determination of storage coefficient is not possible with this test method. Because the volume of aquifer material tested is small, the values obtained are representative of materials very near the open portion of the control well.

Note 1—Slug tests are usually considered to provide estimates of the lower limit of the actual hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer because the test results are so heavily influenced by well efficiency and borehole skin effects near the open portion of the well. The portion of the aquifer that is tested by the slug test is limited to an area near the open portion of the well where the aquifer materials may have been altered during well installation, and therefore may significantly effect the test results. In some cases the data may be misinterpreted and result in a higher estimate of hydraulic conductivity. This is due to the reliance on early time data that is reflective of the hydraulic conductivity of the filter pack surrounding the well. This effect was discussed by Bouwer. In addition, because of the reliance on early time data, in aquifers with medium to high hydraulic conductivity, the early time portion of the curve that is useful for this data analyses is too short (for example, <10 s) for accurate measurement; therefore, the test results begin to greatly underestimate the true hydraulic conductivity.

1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.

1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Keywords

aquifers; aquifer tests; control wells; groundwater; hydraulic conductivity; slug test: Aquifers; Environmental site assessment (ESA)–soil/rock; Transmissivity; Unconfined/unconsolidated aquifers; Water level observation; Ground water; Hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity; Overdamped well-aquifer system; Slug tests; Storage–aquifers

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 07.060 (Geology. Meteorology. Hydrology)

DOI: 10.1520/D5912-96R04

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
1 Scope
Referenced Documents
Terminology
2 Summary of Test Method
Significance and Use
Procedure
FIG. 1
3 Calculation
Report
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
TABLE 1
4 Precision and Bias
Keywords
ASTM-D5912
$35.75