ASTM-E1687:2010 Edition
$40.63
E1687-10 Standard Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASTM | 2010 | 8 |
ASTM E1687-10
Historical Standard: Standard Test Method for Determining Carcinogenic Potential of Virgin Base Oils in Metalworking Fluids
ASTM E1687
Scope
1.1 This test method covers a microbiological test procedure based upon the Salmonella mutagenesis assay of Ames et al (1) (see also Maron et al (2)). It can be used as a screening technique to detect the presence of potential dermal carcinogens in virgin base oils used in the formulation of metalworking oils. Persons who perform this test should be well-versed in the conduct of the Ames test and conversant with the physical and chemical properties of petroleum products.
1.2 The test method is not recommended as the sole testing procedure for oils which have viscosities less than 18 cSt (90 SUS) at 40Ā°C, or for formulated metalworking fluids.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Section 7 provides general guidelines for safe conduct of this test method.
Keywords
base oils; dermal carcinogenicity; modified Ames test; mutagenicity; Base oils; Carcinogenicity; Dermal exposure; Metalworking fluids/related media; Modified Ames test; Mutagenicity; Virgin base oils
ICS Code
ICS Number Code 75.100 (Lubricants, industrial oils and related products)
DOI: 10.1520/E1687-10
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | Scope Referenced Documents Terminology |
2 | Summary of Test Method Significance and Use Interferences Hazards Materials and Methods |
3 | Procedure TABLE 1 |
4 | Calculation and Interpretation of Results Report Precision and Bias |
5 | TABLE 2 |
6 | Keywords A1. METHODS FOR ESTIMATION A1.1 TABLE 3 TABLE 4 |
7 | A2. REPRESENTATIVE MUTAGENICITY DATA A2.1 X1. SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT X1.1 FIG. A2.1 TABLE A2.1 |
8 | REFERENCES |