BS 1377-2:2022
$215.11
Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes – Classification tests and determination of geotechnical properties
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 158 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
7 | Foreword |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
10 | 3 Terms and definitions 4 Determination of water content 4.1 Oven-drying method |
11 | 4.2 Method for saturation water content of chalk 5 Determination of liquid limit |
12 | 5.1 General 5.2 Cone penetrometer method (definitive method) 5.3 One-point cone penetrometer method |
13 | Table 1 ā Factors for one-point cone penetrometer liquid limit test 5.4 Casagrande apparatus method |
14 | 5.5 One-point Casagrande method 6 Determination of plastic limit and plasticity index 6.1 General |
15 | 6.2 Additional parameters 7 Determination of shrinkage characteristicsāLinear shrinkage 7.1 General 7.2 Apparatus |
16 | Figure 1 ā Mould for linear shrinkage test 7.3 Preparation of apparatus 7.4 Procedure |
17 | 7.5 Calculations and expression of results 7.6 Test report 8 Determination of density |
18 | 9 Determination of particle density 9.1 General 9.2 Gas jar method |
20 | 10 Determination of particle size distribution 11 Determination of dry density/water content relationship 11.1 General |
21 | Figure 2 ā Dry density/water content relationship curve |
22 | Table 2 ā Summary of compaction procedures 11.2 Preparation of samples for compaction tests |
23 | Table 3 ā Summary of sample preparation procedures |
24 | Figure 3 ā Grading limits relating to specimen preparation procedures for compaction tests Figure 4 ā Flow chart representing specimen preparation methods for compaction tests |
27 | 11.3 Compaction method using 2.5 kg rammer with 1 L mould |
28 | Figure 5 ā Mould for compaction test (1 L mould) |
29 | Figure 6 ā 2.5 kg rammer for compaction test |
32 | 11.4 Compaction method using 2.5 kg rammer with CBR mould |
33 | 11.5 Compaction method using 4.5 kg rammer with 1 L mould |
34 | Figure 7 ā 4.5 kg rammer for compaction test |
36 | 11.6 Method using 4.5 kg rammer with CBR mould |
37 | 11.7 Compaction method using vibrating hammer |
38 | Figure 8 ā Tampers for vibrating hammer compaction tests |
39 | Table 4 ā Grading for calibration sand |
42 | 12 Determination of maximum and minimum dry densities for coarse soils 12.1 Determination of maximum density of sands |
45 | 12.2 Maximum density of gravelly soils |
47 | 12.3 Minimum density of sands |
48 | 12.4 Minimum density of gravelly soils |
50 | 12.5 Derivation of density index 13 Determination of moisture condition value (MCV) 13.1 General 13.2 Apparatus |
51 | Figure 9 ā Moisture condition apparatus |
53 | 13.3 Checking the moisture condition apparatus 13.4 Determination of the MCV of a specimen of soil at its natural water content |
55 | Figure 10 ā Relationship between change in penetration and number of blows Figure 11 ā Alternative type of relationship between change in penetration and number of blows |
56 | 13.5 Determination of the MCV/water content relation of a soil |
57 | 13.6 Rapid assessment of whether a soil is stronger than a precalibrated standard |
58 | 14 Determination of chalk crushing value (CCV) 14.1 General 14.2 Apparatus |
59 | 14.3 Checking the moisture condition apparatus 14.4 Determination of the chalk crushing value (CCV) |
60 | 15 Determination of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) |
61 | 15.1 General 15.2 Preparation of test specimen |
62 | Figure 12 ā Flow chart representing specimen preparation methods for the CBR test |
63 | Figure 13 ā Cylindrical mould for the determination of the CBR |
64 | Figure 14 ā Plug and collar extension for use with cylindrical mould for the determination of the CBR |
67 | 15.3 Soaking |
68 | Figure 15 ā Apparatus for measuring the swelling of a specimen during soaking for the CBR test |
69 | 15.4 Penetration test procedure |
70 | Figure 16 ā General arrangement of apparatus for the CBR test |
72 | 15.5 Calculation and plotting |
73 | Figure 17 ā Typical CBR test result curves (see 15.5.1.2) |
75 | Figure 18 ā Force penetration curves for a CBR value of 100% and other CBR values Table 5 ā Standard force-penetration relationships for 100% CBR |
76 | 15.6 Test report |
77 | 16 Determination of one-dimensional consolidation properties 16.1 Test method 16.2 Test results |
78 | 17 Determination of swelling and collapse characteristics 17.1 General 17.2 Apparatus 17.3 Measurement of swelling pressure |
79 | 17.4 Measurement of swelling |
81 | 17.5 Measurement of settlement on saturation |
82 | 18 Determination of dispersibility 18.1 Pinhole method |
83 | Figure 19 ā Section of pinhole test apparatus |
85 | Table 6 ā Typical limiting rates of flow imposed by the apparatus |
86 | Figure 20 ā Flowchart for pinhole test procedure |
87 | Table 7 ā Classification of soils from pinhole test data |
88 | 18.2 Crumb method |
89 | 18.3 Dispersion method |
90 | Figure 21 ā Typical results from dispersion (double hydrometer) test |
91 | 19 Determination of frost heave 19.1 General 19.2 Preparation of test specimens |
92 | 19.3 Test procedure 20 Determination of consolidation properties using a hydraulic cell 20.1 General |
93 | Figure 22 ā Drainage and loading conditions for consolidation tests in hydraulic cells |
94 | 20.2 Apparatus |
96 | Figure 23 ā Arrangement of hydraulic cell for vertical drainage consolidation [test type (a)] |
97 | Figure 24 ā Arrangement of hydraulic cell for radial drainage to centre and optional permeability stage |
103 | Figure 25 ā Arrangement for load calibration of diaphragm |
106 | 20.3 Preparation of specimens |
110 | 20.4 Cell assembly |
113 | 20.5 Procedure for consolidation test with one-way vertical drainage |
121 | Figure 26 ā Derivation of t50 from log time curves |
122 | Figure 27 ā Derivation of t50 and t90 from power function curves |
123 | Figure 28 ā Temperature correction curve |
125 | 20.6 Procedure for consolidation test with two-way vertical drainage |
126 | 20.7 Procedure for consolidation test with drainage radially outwards |
129 | 20.8 Procedure for consolidation test with drainage radially inwards |
132 | 21 Determination of permeability in a hydraulic consolidation cell |
133 | 21.1 General 21.2 Apparatus for preparation of specimens 21.3 Apparatus for permeability test |
134 | 21.4 Calibration of apparatus |
135 | 21.5 Preparation and checking of apparatus 21.6 Preparation of test specimen |
136 | 21.7 Assembly of cell 21.8 Test procedures |
138 | 21.9 Calculations |
139 | 21.10 Test report |
140 | 22 Determination of isotropic consolidation properties using a triaxial cell 22.1 Test method 22.2 Calculations |
142 | 22.3 Test report |
143 | 23 Determination of permeability 24 Determination of shear strength by the laboratory vane method 24.1 General 24.2 Apparatus |
144 | Figure 29 ā Laboratory vane apparatus |
145 | 24.3 Procedure |
146 | 24.4 Calculations |
147 | 24.5 Test report 25 Determination of shear strength by direct shear (shearbox methods) 25.1 Shearbox methods |
148 | 25.2 Determination of shear strength by the small shearbox apparatus 25.3 Determination of shear strength by the large shearbox apparatus |
149 | 26 Determination of residual strength using the small ring shear apparatus 26.1 Test method 26.2 Test conditions 26.3 Test report 27 Determination of unconfined compressive strength 27.1 Test method |
150 | 27.2 Test report 28 Unconsolidated undrained triaxial test 28.1 Type of test 28.2 Test conditions 28.3 Test report |
151 | 29 Consolidated-undrained triaxial compression test with measurement of pore pressure 29.1 Test procedure |
152 | 29.2 Test conditions 29.3 Test report 30 Consolidated-drained triaxial compression test with measurement of volume change 30.1 Test procedure |
153 | 30.2 Test conditions 30.3 Test report |
154 | Annex A (informative)ā Example forms Figure A.1 ā Example data sheet |
155 | Figure A.2 ā Example recording form |
156 | Bibliography |