BS EN 17479:2021
$189.07
Hearing protectors. Guidance on selection of individual fit testing methods
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 46 |
This document gives guidelines for the appropriate selection of fit testing methods and measurement, and provides practical guidelines on fit testing methods, their uses and limitations. This document does not specify the technical requirements for manufacturing fit testing equipment.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
7 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
9 | 4 Individual fit testing methods 4.1 General |
10 | 4.2 Test methods |
11 | 4.3 Reference method for sound attenuation measurements of hearing protectors 4.4 Description of different fit testing methods 4.4.1 Sound-level measurements with microphone in real ear (MIRE) (method 1) 4.4.1.1 General |
12 | 4.4.1.2 Sound field generated by a headset (method 1a) 4.4.1.3 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (free field) (method 1b) |
13 | 4.4.2 Audiometric method (determination of the threshold of hearing with and without hearing protector) (method 2) 4.4.2.1 General 4.4.2.2 Sound field generated by a headset (method 2a) 4.4.2.3 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (method 2b) |
14 | 4.4.3 Audiometric-based method (determination of the threshold of hearing with and without hearing protector) (method 3) 4.4.3.1 General 4.4.3.2 Sound field generated by a headset (method 3a) 4.4.3.3 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (method 3b) |
15 | 4.4.4 Loudness balancing method (method 4) 4.4.5 Acoustic leakage test (method 5) |
16 | 4.4.6 Air leakage test (method 6) |
17 | 4.4.7 Summary of different test methods |
18 | 5 Test procedure of the fit testing methods 5.1 General 5.2 Sound-level measurements with microphone in real ear (MIRE) (method 1) 5.2.1 Sound field generated by a headset (method 1a) |
19 | 5.2.2 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (method 1b) |
20 | 5.3 Audiometric method (method 2) 5.3.1 Sound field generated by a headset (method 2a) |
22 | 5.3.2 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (method 2b) |
23 | 5.4 Audiometric-based method (method 3) 5.4.1 Sound field generated by a headset (method 3a) |
24 | 5.4.2 Sound field generated by a loudspeaker (method 3b) 5.5 Loudness balancing (method 4) |
25 | 5.6 Acoustic leakage test (method 5) |
26 | 5.7 Air leakage test (method 6) |
27 | 6 Evaluation criteria 6.1 Application field of the different methods 6.1.1 General |
28 | 6.1.2 Select an appropriate hearing protector |
29 | 6.1.3 End user training 6.1.4 Training for trainers and supervisors 6.1.5 Health surveillance or hearing conservation 6.1.6 Verify adequacy of attenuation to noise level at workplace 6.1.7 Fit of custom moulded earplugs 6.1.8 Awareness increase 6.2 Selection according to ease of use |
30 | 6.3 Individual care for workers with hearing impairment |
31 | 6.4 Applicability of methods to the different types of hearing protectors |
32 | 7 Frequency of fit testing 8 Uncertainty 8.1 General factors for the uncertainty of fit testing |
33 | 8.2 Particular factors regarding the uncertainty for the different fit testing methods 8.2.1 MIRE techniques 8.2.2 Audiometric methods |
34 | 8.2.3 Audiometric-based methods 8.2.4 Loudness balancing 8.2.5 Acoustic leakage test |
35 | 8.2.6 Air leakage test 8.3 Quantitative approach 8.3.1 MIRE techniques 8.3.2 Audiometric systems |
36 | 8.3.3 Audiometric-based systems 8.3.4 Loudness balancing 8.3.5 Acoustic leakage test 8.3.6 Air leakage test 9 Test report |
38 | Annex A (informative)Comparison to target values A.1 General A.2 Sound attenuation values from type examination A.2.1 General A.2.2 Octave band values |
39 | A.2.3 HML and SNR values |
40 | A.3 Residual levels at the ear |
42 | Annex B (informative)Example of a protocol for the determination of measurement uncertainty |