Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BS EN 55016-1-5:2015

$215.11

Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus. Antenna calibration sites and reference test sites for 5 MHz to 18 GHz

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2015 98
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

CISPR 16-1-5:2014 specifies the requirements for calibration sites in the frequency range 5 MHz to 18 GHz used to perform antenna calibrations according to CISPR 16-1-6. It also specifies the requirements for reference test sites that are used for the validation of compliance test sites in the frequency range 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz according to CISPR 16-1-4. It has the status of a basic EMC standard in accordance with IEC Guide 107. Measurement instrumentation specifications are given in CISPR 16-1-1 and CISPR 16-1-4. Further information and background on uncertainties in general is given in CISPR 16-4, which can also be helpful in establishing uncertainty estimates for the calibration processes of antennas and site validation measurements. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2003, and its Amendment 1 (2012). It constitutes a technical revision which includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: – site validation methods for other sites covered in CISPR 16-1-6 are added; – smaller step sizes are specified for swept frequency measurements; – the minimum ground plane size is increased; – and other miscellaneous technical and editorial refinements are included. Keywords: electromagnetic compatibility

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
6 English
CONTENTS
10 INTRODUCTION
11 Tables
Table 1 – Summary of site validation methods by subclause number
12 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Terms and definitions
13 3.1.1 Antenna terms
15 3.1.2 Measurement site terms
16 3.1.3 Other terms
17 3.2 Abbreviations
18 4 Specifications and validation procedures for CALTS and REFTS from 5 MHz to 1 000 MHz
4.1 General
4.2 Antenna calibration test site (CALTS) specification
4.2.1 General
19 4.2.2 Normative specification
4.3 Test antenna specification
4.3.1 General
20 4.3.2 Details of the required characteristics of the test antenna
Figures
Figure 1 – Schematic diagram of the test antenna
Table 2 – Maximum tolerances for d = 10 m
21 Figure 2 – Adjustment of a telescopic wire element to the length Lwe
22 4.4 Antenna calibration test site validation procedure
4.4.1 General
4.4.2 Test set-up
24 4.4.3 Test frequencies and receive antenna heights
4.4.4 SIL measurements
Table 3 – Frequency and fixed receive antenna height data for SIL measurementsat 24 frequencies, with ht = 2 m and d = 10 m (specified in 4.4.2.3 and 4.4.2.4)
25 Figure 3 – Determination of Vr1(f) or Vr2(f)
Figure 4 – Determination of Vs(f) with the wire antennas in their specified positions
27 4.4.5 Swept frequency SIL measurements
Table 4 – RSM frequency steps
28 Figure 5 – Example NSIL: horizontal polarization, antenna height 2 m, separation 10 m
Table 5 (informative) – Antenna heights for SIL measurements
29 Figure 6 – NSIL of the four pairs of calculable dipoles at 10 m separation and using the alternative heights for the 600 MHz to 1 000 MHzpair according to Table 5
30 4.4.6 Identifying and reducing reflections from antenna supports
4.5 Antenna calibration test site acceptance criteria
4.5.1 General
4.5.2 Measurement uncertainties
31 4.5.3 Acceptance criteria
Figure 7 – Relation between the quantities used in the SIL acceptance criterion
32 4.6 Calibration site with a metal ground plane for biconical antennas and tuned dipole antennas over the frequency range 30 MHz to 300 MHz
33 4.7 Validation of a REFTS
4.7.1 General
4.7.2 Validation for horizontal polarization
4.7.3 Validation for vertical polarization
Table 6 – Antenna set-up for the SIL measurement of the calibration site using horizontally polarized resonant dipole antennas(see also 4.4.4 for SIL at 250 MHz and 300 MHz)
34 Table 7 – Antenna heights
35 4.8 Validation report for CALTS and REFTS
4.8.1 General
4.8.2 Validation report requirements
36 4.9 Site validation for the calibration of biconical and dipole antennas, and the biconical part of hybrid antennas in vertical polarization
37 4.10 Validation of a CALTS using vertical polarization from 5 MHz to 30 MHz for the calibration of monopole antennas
4.10.1 General
38 4.10.2 Uncertainty evaluation
5 Validation methods for a FAR from 30 MHz to 18 GHz
5.1 General
Table 8 – Example measurement uncertainty budget for SIL between two monopole antennas
39 5.2 Validation procedure from 1 GHz to 18 GHz
5.2.1 Power transfer between two antennas
5.2.2 Measurement procedure for validation from 1 GHz to 18 GHz
40 Figure 8 – Set-up of site validation for EMC antenna calibrations above 1 GHz in a FAR, also showing distance between antenna phase centres
41 5.2.3 Analysis of results
42 5.2.4 Acceptance criterion
Figure 9 – Example plots of [Ai m(d) ( Ai m(d3 m)] in dB against distance in m at 1 GHz to 18 GHz in 1 GHz steps, corrected for LPDA and horn phase centres
43 5.2.5 Chamber performance versus polarization
5.2.6 Uncertainty
Table 9 – Example measurement uncertainty budget for FAR validation method at and above 1 GHz
44 5.3 Validation of a FAR for the calibration of antennas by alternative methods
5.3.1 General
5.3.2 Validation of a FAR from 30 MHz to 1 GHz
5.3.3 Alternative validation of a FAR for the calibration of LPDA antennas above 1 GHz
45 5.3.4 Alternative validation of a FAR applying time-domain measurements above 500 MHz
6 Validation methods for sites used for the calibration of directive antennas
6.1 Validation of the calibration site minimizing ground reflection by a height ≥ 4 m
6.1.1 Measurement procedure
46 Figure 10 – Example of antenna set-up for an LPDA antenna calibration in the frequency range above 200 MHz
47 6.1.2 Uncertainties
Figure 11 – Example of SIL versus antenna height measured at 200 MHz withtwo LPDA antennas in vertical polarization at 2,5 m distance between their midpoints above the reflecting ground plane of an OATS
Figure 12 – Illustration of distances of transmit horn to omni-directional receive antenna and reflective building, and transmitted signal paths A and B
48 6.2 Validation of the calibration site minimizing ground reflection by use of absorber
Table 10 – Example measurement uncertainty budget forthe site validation method in 6.1.1
49 7 Site validation by comparison of antenna factors, and application of RSM to evaluate the uncertainty contribution of a SAC site
7.1 Use of SAM for site validation by comparison of antenna factors
50 7.2 Application of RSM to evaluate the measurement uncertainty contribution of a calibration site comprising a SAC
51 Table 11 – Maximum tolerances for validation set-up at d = 10 m
52 Annex A (informative) CALTS characteristics and validation
A.1 General
A.2 The reflecting plane
A.2.1 Reflecting plane construction
53 A.2.2 Plane-edge effects and plane surroundings
A.3 Ancillary equipment
Table A.1 – Example of fixed-length calculable dipole antennasand their subdivision of the frequency range 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz
54 A.4 Additional stringent CALTS validation testing
A.4.1 General
A.4.2 Antenna-height scan measurements
55 A.4.3 Frequency scan measurements
56 Table A.2 – Receive antenna heights and centre frequencies
58 Annex B (informative) Test antenna considerations
B.1 General
B.2 Example and verification of a test antenna
60 B.3 Determination of balun properties
B.3.1 The ideal lossless balun
Figure B.1 – Example of a test antenna
61 B.3.2 Relations between balun properties and Sparameters
Figure B.2 – Diagram of the measurement of S11 and S12, and of S22 and S21, when generator and load are interchanged
62 B.3.3 Insertion loss measurements
63 Figure B.3 – Schematic diagram for determination of the insertion loss A1(f)
Figure B.4 – Schematic diagram for determination of the insertion loss A2(f)
65 Annex C (informative) Antenna and SIL theory
C.1 Analytical relations
C.1.1 General
66 C.1.2 Total length of the test antenna
67 C.1.3 Theoretical SIL
68 Figure C.1 – Network model for Ai c calculations
Figure C.2 – Equivalent circuit to the network in Figure C.1
69 Figure C.3 – Definition of the mutual couplings, feed-terminal voltages and antenna currents of the antennas above the reflecting plane and their images
71 C.1.4 Calculation example
Table C.1 – Example numerical (analytical) calculation of La, Ai c (see C.1.4.2)
73 Table C.2 – Example numerical (analytical) calculation of ∆At (see C.1.4.3)
74 C.2 Computations by the MoM
C.2.1 General
Table C.3 – Example numerical (analytical) calculation of hrc and Δft
Table C.4 – Example numerical (analytical) calculation of fc and Δft
75 C.2.2 Antenna input impedance
C.2.3 Total length of the test antenna
C.2.4 SIL computations
76 Figure C.4 – Cascade combination of the baluns and the site twoport network
77 Figure C.5 – Flow chart showing how SIL is obtained by combining the measured balun Sparameters and the NEC calculated Sparameters of the site two-port network
80 Table C.5 – MoM example calculation of Ai c for vertical polarization,ht = 2 m, except ht = 2,75 m at 30 MHz, 35 MHz and 40 MHz
82 C.2.5 Antenna factor (AF) computations
86 Annex D (informative) Pascal Program used in C.1.4
90 Annex E (informative) Validation procedure checklist
92 Annex F (informative) Evidence that field taper of VP site validation methodh as negligible effect on measured antenna factor
F.1 Investigation of vertical field taper
F.2 Calibration of biconical antennas using vertical polarization
Figure F.1 – Field uniformity with height step 1 m to 2,6 m, normalized to field at 1,8 m height; monocone at 15 m range
93 Figure F.2 – Averaging of height steps, SAM, B.4.2 in CISPR 16-1-6:2014
94 Bibliography
BS EN 55016-1-5:2015
$215.11