Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BS EN IEC 62464-1:2019 – TC:2020 Edition

$280.87

Tracked Changes. Magnetic resonance equipment for medical imaging – Determination of essential image quality parameters

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2020 222
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

IEC 62464-1:2018 specifies measurement procedures for the determination of many essential image quality parameters for MR EQUIPMENT. Measurement procedures as addressed in this document are suitable for – quality assessment in the ACCEPTANCE TEST, and – quality assurance in the CONSTANCY TEST. Required levels of performance for ACCEPTANCE TESTS are not provided for all tests. This document does not address – image quality assessment of MR EQUIPMENT with a static magnetic field intensity greater than 8 Tesla, if not otherwise stated, – image quality affected by MR-compatibility issues, – special diagnostic procedures such as flow imaging, perfusion, diffusion, radiotherapy and image-guided therapy applications, and – TYPE TESTS. The scope of this document is also limited to measuring image quality characteristics in images acquired on TEST DEVICES, not in PATIENT images. The measurement procedures specified in this document are directed to – MANUFACTURERS, who can demonstrate compliance by performing ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS as described by this document, – test houses, who can confirm performance of MR EQUIPMENT using methods described in this document, – regulatory authorities, who can reference this document, and – RESPONSIBLE ORGANISATIONS who want to perform ACCEPTANCE and CONSTANCY TESTS using methods described in this document. The essential image quality parameters and measurement methodologies defined in this document are – SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO, – UNIFORMITY, – SLICE THICKNESS in 2-D scanning, – 2-D GEOMETRIC DISTORTION, – SPATIAL RESOLUTION, and – GHOSTING ARTEFACTS. Each of these procedures can be performed standalone or in combination with any of the other procedures. This document describes the preferred measurement procedures. It also describes alternative normative methods in Annex A. The preferred test methods may be substituted with these alternative normative methods. If necessary, other methods not described in this document can be used, provided those other test methods are documented and validated against the methods described in the document: it means an analysis is done by comparison to the original method that demonstrates a similar, or better, level of sensitivity to the same parameter of interest and a similar, or better, level of robustness against unrelated parameters. All methods will produce quantitative results. The rationale to the preferred and alternate methods, and their pitfalls, are described in Annex B. This document also presents requirements for CONSTANCY TESTS suitable for MR EQUIPMENT quality assurance programs concerning essential image quality parameters. There are no preferred CONSTANCY TEST methods, to provide flexibility in using existing automated procedures where available, but suggested examples of test methods can be found in Annex A. This document places an emphasis on consistently repeatable, automated measuring tools that facilitate trend analysis and the frequent quick testing of a small set of important parameters that are sensitive to the overall operating characteristics of the MR EQUIPMENT. IEC 62464-1:2018 cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2007. This edition constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: a)    the tests have been revised to comply with the technical progress; b)    the range of B0 was increased from 4 T to 8 T.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
130 undefined
133 Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications
135 English
CONTENTS
139 FOREWORD
141 INTRODUCTION
143 1 Scope
144 2 Normative references
3 Terms, definitions, symbols and abbreviated terms
3.1 Terms and definitions
149 4 * Procedures for the determination of essential image parameters
4.1 General requirements for all procedures
4.1.1 Requirements for the system
4.1.2 Requirements for the test device
4.1.3 Scan parameters
150 4.1.4 Reporting of results
151 Tables
Table 1 – Common parameters
152 Table 2 – Acquisition parameters
153 4.2 * Signal to noise ratio
4.2.1 Objectives and rationale
4.2.2 Requirements for the test device
4.2.3 Scan parameters
4.2.4 Measurement procedure
154 4.2.5 Data analysis and tolerances
4.2.6 Reporting of results
155 4.3 * Uniformity
4.3.1 Objectives and rationale
4.3.2 Requirements for the test device
4.3.3 Scan parameters
Table 3 – Reporting of results for SNR
156 4.3.4 Measurement procedure
4.3.5 Data analysis and tolerances
4.3.6 Reporting of results
Table 4 – Reporting of results for uniformity
157 4.4 Slice thickness in 2-D scanning
4.4.1 Objectives and rationale
4.4.2 Requirements for the test device
158 4.4.3 Scan parameters
Figures
Figure 1 – Signal intensity profile in the inclined slab method
159 4.4.4 Measurement procedure
4.4.5 Data analysis and tolerances
160 4.4.6 Reporting of results
4.4.7 Reporting of acceptance results
4.5 * Two-dimensional geometric distortion
4.5.1 Objectives and rationale
Figure 2 – Correcting for rotation of test device
Table 5 – Reporting of results for slice thickness
161 4.5.2 * Requirements for the test device
162 Figure 3 – Example of a boundary wall test device for a spherical specification volume with two lines passing through the centre
163 4.5.3 Scan parameters
4.5.4 * Measurement procedure
Figure 4 – Example of a fiducial marker test device for a spherical specification volume
164 4.5.5 * Data analysis and tolerances
Figure 5 – Distances to be determined
165 4.5.6 Reporting of results
4.6 * Spatial resolution
4.6.1 Objectives and rationale
4.6.2 Requirements for the test device
Table 6 – Reporting of results for geometric distortion
166 4.6.3 Scan parameters
Figure 6 – Periodic pattern
167 4.6.4 Measurement procedure
Figure 7 – Image of periodic pattern and position of roi for coronal scans
Table 7 – Phantom, plane and gradient orientation for resolution assessment
168 4.6.5 Data analysis and tolerances
4.6.6 Reporting of results
Figure 8 – Image of periodic pattern and position of roifor transverse and sagittal scans
169 4.6.7 Reporting of acceptance results
4.7 * Ghosting artefacts
4.7.1 Objectives and rationale
4.7.2 * Requirements for the test device
4.7.3 Scan parameters
Table 8 – Reporting of results for spatial resolution
170 4.7.4 Measurement procedure
4.7.5 Data analysis and tolerances
171 4.7.6 Reporting of results
Figure 9 – Example image of the test device and regionof interest (roi) for signal, ghost, and noise measurements
Table 9 – Reporting of results for ghosting artefacts
172 5 * Constancy test
5.1 Objectives and rationale
5.2 Requirements for the test device
5.3 Scan characteristics
5.4 Measurement procedure
173 5.5 Data analysis, reporting of results and tolerances
Table 10 – Required constancy tests – Parameter settings
174 Annex A (normative)Alternative methods
A.1 Pertaining to 4.2 signal to noise ratio
A.1.1 General
A.1.2 Alternative method: snr measurements using alternative noise determination
175 A.1.3 Alternative method: snr “single image”
176 A.2 Pertaining to 4.3 Uniformity
A.2.1 General
A.2.2 Alternative method “grey-scale map”
177 Table A.1 – Reporting of results for uniformity “grey-scale map”
178 A.2.3 Alternative method “ACR method”
A.3 Pertaining to 4.4 Slice thickness in 2-D scanning
A.3.1 General
179 A.3.2 Alternative method: slice thickness in 2-D scanning: wedge method
Figure A.1 – Wedge test device
180 Figure A.2 – Measurement of slice profile and slice thickness using wedge test device
181 A.4 Pertaining to 4.5 Two-dimensional geometric distortion
A.4.1 General
A.4.2 Alternative method: geometric distortion measurements using elliptical boundary test devices
182 A.4.3 Alternative method: 3D geometric distortion component measurement method
Figure A.3 – Determination of radius length of an ellipse with semi axis lengtha and b forming an angle α with respect to the X axis
184 Figure A.4 – Possible test device configurations for measuring geometric distortion
185 Table A.2 – Recommended fiducial volumes
186 Figure A.5 – Two elements with an apparent spacing of Ai(x,y) buta true spacing of Ti(x,y)
188 Figure A.6 – A schematic of a spatial mapping geometric distortion plot
189 A.5 Pertaining to 4.6 spatial resolution
A.5.1 General
Figure A.7 – Scatter plot of geometric distortion error
Table A.3 – Example of error table
190 A.5.2 Alternative method: determination of the full modulation transfer function
191 A.6 Pertaining to 5 Constancy tests
A.6.1 Alternative constancy test methods
Table A.4 – Reporting of results for spatial resolution (MTF method)
192 Table A.5 – Reporting of results for centre frequency
193 Table A.6 – Reporting of results for RF calibration
194 A.6.2 Pitfalls
Table A.7 – Reporting of results for geometric accuracy
195 Annex B (informative)Rationale
B.1 Pertaining to 4 * Procedures for the determination of essential image parameters
B.2 Pertaining to 4.2 Signal to noise ratio
B.2.1 Rationale
197 Figure B.1 – Relaxation times T1 and T2 in dependencyon the concentration of CuSO4 x 5 H2O
198 Table B.1 – Test device conductivity and dielectric properties
200 Table B.2 – Bandwidth-related quantities as provided by different vendors
201 Table B.3 – Relaxation fit parameters for Gd(TMHD) at concentrations ≤ 4 parts per thousand by weight
202 Table B.4 – Noise correction factors by number of complex channels
208 B.2.2 References
B.3 Pertaining to 4.3 Uniformity
B.3.1 Rationale
B.3.2 AAD method
B.3.3 Standing waves
209 B.4 Pertaining to 4.5 Two-dimensional geometric distortion
B.4.1 Rationale
210 B.4.2 Pitfalls
211 Figure B.2 – Centring error
214 B.5 Pertaining to 4.6 Spatial resolution
B.5.1 Rationale
215 B.5.2 Pitfalls
216 B.6 Pertaining to 4.7 Ghosting artefacts
B.6.1 Rationale
B.6.2 Pitfalls
217 B.6.3 References
B.7 Pertaining to 5 Constancy test – Rationale
219 Index of defined terms
220 Bibliography
BS EN IEC 62464-1:2019 - TC
$280.87