BS EN IEC 62960:2020
$198.66
Dependability reviews during the life cycle
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2020 | 62 |
IEC 62960:2020 provides guidance on a review methodology for dependability from a technical perspective that is applicable at all stages of a system life cycle. Its application can improve the dependability of a system throughout its life cycle by triggering appropriate actions at appropriate times to address potential dependability problems. It provides guidance for developers, manufacturers, users and third-party independent reviewers such as consulting organizations. This document describes a dependability review methodology focusing on: – coherence of review activities across life cycle stages and their impact on dependability; – stakeholder identification and how this affects dependability review activities; – the relationships between different types of reviews; – procedures for effective dependability reviews; – examples of dependability review activities.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
5 | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
7 | English CONTENTS |
10 | FOREWORD |
12 | INTRODUCTION |
13 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 3.1 Terms and definitions |
16 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms 4 Introducing dependability reviews 4.1 General |
18 | 4.2 Technical reviews 4.3 Status reviews |
19 | 4.4 Overview of the dependability review method 4.4.1 Overview 4.4.2 Identifying stakeholders |
20 | 4.4.3 Identifying what the requirements are 4.4.4 Capturing information on actual performance 4.4.5 Assessing the gap between requirements and actual performance 4.4.6 Identifying risks and areas of concern |
21 | 4.4.7 Recommending actions 4.5 Planning for and timing of dependability reviews |
22 | 4.6 Levels of dependability reviews 4.6.1 Overview |
23 | 4.6.2 Team reviews 4.6.3 Project reviews Figure 1 – Flow of reviews during a life cycle stage |
24 | 4.6.4 Status reviews 5 Dependability review activities during the life cycle 5.1 General |
25 | 5.2 Concept stage 5.3 Development stage 5.3.1 Overview |
26 | 5.3.2 Design reviews |
27 | 5.4 Realization stage |
28 | 5.5 Utilization stage 5.6 Enhancement stage |
29 | 5.7 Retirement stage 6 Implementing the dependability review process 6.1 General 6.2 Planning of the review Figure 2 – Implementing the review process |
30 | 6.3 Selection of the review team 6.4 Preparation of the input package 6.5 Meeting notification and agenda |
31 | 6.6 Conducting a review meeting 6.6.1 General 6.6.2 Meeting protocol |
32 | 6.6.3 Action points 6.6.4 Recommendations 6.6.5 Rejected action points and recommendations 6.6.6 Meeting conclusion 6.7 Preparing and distributing review minutes 6.7.1 General |
33 | 6.7.2 Minutes 6.8 Actions and recommendations from a review |
34 | 6.9 Follow-up and completion of action points and recommendations |
35 | Annex A (informative)Examples of an input package for a review A.1 Concept stage A.2 Development stage A.3 Realization stage |
36 | A.4 Utilization stage A.5 Enhancement stage |
37 | A.6 Retirement stage |
38 | Annex B (informative)Examples of objectives for dependability reviews during the life cycle B.1 General B.2 Concept stage B.3 Development stage B.3.1 Conceptual design review B.3.2 Detail design review |
39 | B.3.3 Final design review B.4 Realization stage |
40 | B.5 Utilization stage B.5.1 Operation B.5.2 Maintenance B.6 Enhancement stage |
41 | B.7 Retirement stage |
42 | Annex C (informative)Considerations during dependability reviews through the life cycle C.1 General C.2 Examples of dependability review considerations in the concept stage |
43 | C.3 Examples of dependability review considerations in the development stage |
44 | C.4 Examples of dependability review considerations in the realization stage |
45 | C.5 Examples of dependability review considerations in the utilization stage |
46 | C.6 Examples of dependability review considerations in the enhancement stage |
47 | C.7 Examples of dependability review considerations in the retirement stage |
48 | Annex D (informative)Functions and responsibilities of some key persons for a technical review D.1 General D.2 Chair |
49 | D.3 Secretary D.4 Relevant specialists |
50 | D.5 Project or team manager and members D.6 Customers and users |
51 | Annex E (informative)Dependability topics for a review E.1 General E.2 Reliability E.3 Maintainability |
52 | E.4 Maintenance E.5 Maintenance support E.6 Availability |
53 | E.7 Quality assurance |
54 | E.8 Environmental effects |
55 | E.9 Product safety E.10 Human factors |
56 | E.11 Legal matters |
57 | E.12 Durability E.13 Security E.14 Property damage |
58 | E.15 Accountability |
59 | Bibliography |