BS EN ISO 19901-9:2019
$215.11
Petroleum and natural gas industries. Specific requirements for offshore structures – Structural integrity management
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2019 | 154 |
This document specifies principles for the structural integrity management (SIM) of offshore structures subjected to known or foreseeable types of actions.
This document specifies requirements and provides recommendations applicable to the following types of fixed steel offshore structures for the petroleum and natural gas industries:
-
caissons, free-standing and braced;
-
jackets;
-
monotowers;
-
towers.
This document is applicable to topsides, including but not limited to the main decks, deck legs, topsides modules, crane pedestals, helideck, drilling derrick, skid beams, flare booms, exhaust towers, radio tower, conductor support frames, and lifeboat davits. In addition, it is applicable to compliant bottom founded structures, steel gravity structures, jack-ups, other bottom founded structures and other structures related to offshore structures (e.g. underwater oil storage tanks, bridges and connecting structures), to the extent to which its requirements are relevant.
This document contains requirements for planning and engineering of the following tasks:
-
integrity management data requirements;
-
in-service inspection and integrity management of both new and existing structures;
-
assessment of existing structures;
-
evaluation of structures for reuse at different locations;
-
evaluation of structures for their future removal.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | National foreword |
4 | European foreword Endorsement notice |
8 | Foreword |
9 | Introduction |
10 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
11 | 3 Terms and definitions |
13 | 4 Symbols |
14 | 5 Abbreviated terms |
15 | 6 SIM fundamentals 6.1 General 6.2 Limit states and performance levels 6.3 Fitness-for-service assessment |
16 | 6.4 Management framework |
17 | 6.5 Design |
18 | 6.6 Topsides 6.7 Continued service 6.8 Structural integrity interfaces 7 SIM process |
19 | 8 SIM data 8.1 General |
20 | 8.2 Missing data 8.3 Data management |
21 | 9 SIM evaluation 9.1 General 9.2 Data evaluation 9.3 Hazards, hazardous events and degradation mechanisms 9.4 Critical structure (CS) 9.5 Risk 9.5.1 General |
22 | 9.5.2 Consequence 9.5.3 Likelihood 9.5.4 Risk presentation 9.6 Demonstrating fitness-for-service |
23 | 9.7 Assessment 9.7.1 General 9.7.2 Assessment motive |
24 | 9.7.3 Assessment initiators 9.8 Mitigation measures 9.8.1 General |
25 | 9.8.2 Consequence reduction 9.8.3 Likelihood reduction 10 SIM strategy 10.1 General |
26 | 10.2 Inspection strategy 10.2.1 General |
27 | 10.2.2 Inspection motives 10.2.3 Inspection type 10.2.4 Inspection method 10.2.5 Inspection interval |
29 | 10.2.6 Inspection scope 10.2.7 Pre-selected inspection areas |
30 | 10.3 Maintenance strategy 10.4 Monitoring strategy 10.4.1 General |
31 | 10.4.2 Weight and centre of gravity (CoG) monitoring 10.4.3 Deck elevation monitoring 10.4.4 Natural frequency monitoring 10.4.5 Corrosion protection monitoring 10.4.6 Metocean monitoring 10.5 Evacuation strategy |
32 | 10.6 Marine site investigations 11 SIM Program 11.1 General 11.2 Inspection program 11.2.1 General 11.2.2 Specifications |
33 | 11.2.3 Inspection method |
34 | 11.3 Maintenance program 11.4 Monitoring program |
35 | 12 Assessment 12.1 General 12.2 Assessment information 12.3 Assessment method 12.3.1 General |
36 | 12.3.2 Qualitative method |
37 | 12.3.3 Semi-quantitative method |
38 | 12.3.4 Quantitative methods |
40 | 12.3.5 Fatigue analysis 12.4 Assessment model 12.4.1 General 12.4.2 Tubular members |
41 | 12.4.3 Connections 12.4.4 Conductors 12.4.5 Damage |
42 | 12.4.6 Repaired and strengthened elements 12.4.7 Foundation model |
43 | 12.4.8 Material strength 12.5 Assessment for gravity hazard 12.5.1 General |
44 | 12.5.2 Design level method (DLM) 12.5.3 Ultimate strength method (USM) 12.6 Assessment for metocean hazard 12.6.1 General 12.6.2 Metocean criteria 12.6.3 Crest elevation |
45 | 12.6.4 Metocean action combinations — Jacket 12.6.5 Metocean action combinations — Deck 12.6.6 Directionality of metocean hazards |
46 | 12.6.7 Design level method (DLM) 12.6.8 Linear-elastic redundancy method 12.6.9 Ultimate strength method (USM) |
47 | 12.7 Assessment for seismic hazard 12.7.1 General 12.7.2 Seismic criteria 12.7.3 Seismic action combinations |
48 | 12.7.4 Directionality of seismic hazards 12.7.5 Design level method (DLM) |
49 | 12.7.6 Ultimate strength method (USM) 12.8 Assessment for collision hazard 12.8.1 General |
50 | 12.8.2 Collision zone 12.8.3 Collision criteria 12.8.4 Directionality of collision hazards 12.8.5 Collision assessment method 12.9 Assessment for ice hazard |
51 | 12.10 Assessment for explosion hazard 12.11 Assessment for fire hazard 13 Reuse 13.1 General 13.2 Fatigue in reused structures 13.3 Steel in reused structures |
52 | 13.4 Inspection of reused structures 13.4.1 General 13.4.2 Initial condition assessment of structural members and connections 13.4.3 Extent of weld inspection |
53 | 13.4.4 Corrosion protection systems 13.5 Removal and reinstallation 14 Decommissioning and removal 14.1 General 14.2 Decommissioning process 14.3 Pre-decommissioning data gathering 14.4 Planning and engineering |
54 | 14.5 Well decommissioning 14.6 Facilities decommissioning 14.7 Pipeline decommissioning 14.8 Conductor removal 14.9 Structure removal 14.10 Site clearance |
55 | Annex A (informative) Additional information and guidance |
150 | Bibliography |