Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD CEN/TR 16680:2014

$102.76

Liquid petroleum products. Investigation on internal diesel injector sticking deposits mechanisms and the impacts of corrosion inhibitors

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2014 22
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This Technical Report describes the investigation into diesel vehicle common rail fuel injector sticking problems in a number of countries across Europe since 2005/2006, carried out by the CEN/TC 19/WG 24/IDID Task Force. It provides conclusions following this work that have been adopted by CEN.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
5 Foreword
6 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Symbols and abbreviations
7 4 Summary
5 Description of injector sticking problems
Figure 1 — Types of injector deposits (courtesy PSA)
8 Figure 2 —Example of caboxylate injector deposits (courtesy Daimler)
6 FIEM/OEM experience
9 7 Changes influencing internal injector deposits
8 Deposit forming mechanism
10 Figure 3 — FTIR analysis of injector deposits from the French market (data courtesy Ford)
Figure 4 — FTIR analysis of injector deposits (data courtesy Afton Chemical Ltd)
9 Potential sources of sodium in diesel fuel
11 10 Corrosion inhibitors
11 Investigations in France
12 Figure 5 — Sodium levels in key European markets and the USA (Source SGS surveys)
Figure 6 —European diesel survey on sodium (in mg/kg) (data courtesy CONCAWE)
13 Figure 7 — Field measurements of sodium (in mg/kg) in FAME (data courtesy AGQM)
14 12 Investigations in Spain
Figure 8 —Internal common-rail injector deposits from a light duty vehicle (courtesy Repsol)
Figure 9 —Internal nozzle deposits in heating oil burners (courtesy Repsol)
15 Figure 10 — GC-MS chromatograms from all deposits adhered to nozzle needle (red line) and corrosion inhibitor additive (green line) after solubilisation and derivatisation process
16 13 Investigations in Denmark
Table 1 — Acid Number of different corrosion inhibitor additives
Figure 11 — Filter Blocking Tendency (FBT) vs. additive concentration (in mg/kg)
17 Table 2 — FBT vs. acid lubricity additive content at different sodium contents
Figure 12 — FBT vs. acid lubricity additive content at different sodium contents
14 Conclusions
18 15 Future work
19 Bibliography
BSI PD CEN/TR 16680:2014
$102.76