Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD CEN/TR 16982:2016

$167.15

Diesel blends and fuels. Cold filterability issues

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2016 34
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This Technical Report provides the latest thinking described during a workshop on 1 June 2015 by national experts involved in the investigations, and proposes possible solutions to solve the diesel fuel filter plugging issues in these countries.

NOTE

For the purposes of this Technical Report, the terms “% ( m/m)” and “% ( V/V)” are used to represent respectively the mass fraction, µ, and the volume fraction, φ.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
4 Contents Page
5 European foreword
6 Introduction
7 1 Scope
2 Background to this Technical Report
3 Issues in specific European markets
3.1 UK experience
8 Figure 1 — Average and maximum FBT (right y-axis) by IP 387 Procedure B, average Total Contamination in mg/kg and average FAME content in % (V/V) (left y-axis) from 111 samples of diesel fuel collected from service stations in 8 European countries
9 3.2 Sweden
10 Figure 2 — Fuel filter replacement rate per 1 000 vehicles for one OEM (2 different model years)
13 Figure 5 — The effects of prolonged low temperatures (−20 C) on blends of different FAMEs at various concentrations in Swedish MK1 diesel: dTME (left) and RME (right)
3.3 Italy
14 4 Cold operability rig tests
4.1 Infineum Freezer Rig
15 Figure 6 — Schematic of the Infineum Freezer Rig
Figure 7 — Example of typical delta pressure curves produced by the Infineum freezer rig when testing fuels with good and bad low temperature filterability
16 Figure 8 — Infineum freezer rig results for various retail diesel samples and lab blends
17 Figure 9 — Preliminary Infineum freezer rig data on experimental lab blends
4.2 PSA Filter Rig
Figure 10 — Correlation between FAME Cloud Point and saturated methyl ester content
18 Figure 11 — Photograph of PSA low temperature filterability rig (left) and test cycle (right)
19 Figure 12 — PSA rig test results obtained on B7 samples with different levels of saturated FAMEs
5 Filterability test developments
5.1 Total contamination test (EN 12662, WG 31)
20 5.2 CS-FBT (WG 31)
5.3 Cold FBT (Energy Institute SC-B-5)
21 Figure 13 — Cold FBT results for B0 and B0 blended with 1 % (V/V) FAME suspected of containing polyethylene
22 Figure 14 —Cold FBT results at various test temperatures for a selection of UK market winter diesel samples
23 Figure 15 — Comparison between Cold FBT and Cold Soak – Cold FBT results for six fuels (filtration step conducted at −1 C)
6 Other experiences
6.1 Afton investigations
24 Table 1 — FBT results for B10 blends of FAME made from various feedstocks in RF-79 reference fuel with SMGs added at different concentrations
Figure 16 — The effect on FBT of adding DCA to B10 blends of different FAMEs in RF-79 doped with SMGs
25 Figure 17 — The effect on FBT of adding DCA to B10 blends of UCOME in RF-79 doped with varying concentrations of SGs
Figure 18 — FBT of B10 UCOME blends doped with varying concentrations of sodium and the effect of adding DCA
26 Figure 19 — The influence of polyethylene on FBT
6.2 Argent experience with distilled TME
27 Table 2 — Typical ranges of key quality parameters for FAME produced at the Argent plant
28 6.3 Diesel fuel cold operability correlation (WG 34)
Figure 20 — Fuel factors influencing fuel filter plugging
29 Figure 21 — Vehicle factors influencing fuel filter plugging
Figure 22 — Other factors influencing fuel filter plugging
30 7 Discussion and next steps
31 Bibliography
BSI PD CEN/TR 16982:2016
$167.15