🔥🔥 Don’t Miss Out on Our End of Autumn Sale. If you have any questions, feel free to click the bottom right corner to contact our customer service..

Concat us[email protected]
Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

🔍
BSI PD IEC/TR 62939-1:2014

BSI PD IEC/TR 62939-1:2014

$215.11

Smart grid user interface – Interface overview and country perspectives

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2014 132
PDF Format Searchable Printable Preview Now
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This part of IEC 62939, which is a technical report, presents an international consensus perspective on the vision for a Smart Grid user interface (SGUI) including: SGUI requirements distilled from use cases for communications across the customer interface (the SGUI); an analysis of existing IEC and other international standards that relate to the SGUI; and an identification of standards gaps that need to be filled and might become potential work items for IEC Project Committee 118.

The PC 118 scope is, “Standardization in the field of information exchange for demand response and in connecting demand side equipment and/or systems into the Smart Grid”. This report presents the information exchange and interface requirements leading to standards to support effective integration of consumer systems and devices into the Smart Grid.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
4 CONTENTS
10 FOREWORD
12 0 Introduction
0.1 High-level definition of Smart Grid user interface (SGUI)
0.2 PC 118 history
0.3 Relation of IEC PC 118 to other IEC technical committees
13 0.4 Report overview
0.5 Key recommendations and findings
14 1 Scope
2 Smart Grid user interface overview
2.1 SGUI – Consensus perspective
15 Figures
Figure 1 – High-level view of the SGUI architecture as interface (blue line) between different domains
16 2.2 Inter-domain interoperability
2.2.1 General
2.2.2 Agreement at the interface – a contract
2.2.3 Boundary of authority
2.2.4 Decision making in very large networks
17 2.2.5 The role of standards
2.3 Smart Grid user applications
2.3.1 General
2.3.2 Demand response
18 Figure 2 – Levels of demand response interactions
20 Figure 3 – Interactive demand response versus DLC
22 2.3.3 Other SGUI applications
2.4 SGUI functional requirements
24 2.5 Architecture
Figure 4 – Information exchange through the SGUI between the grid (external service providers) and users in the Customer Facility domain
25 Figure 5 – High-level generic Smart Grid user interface architecture
26 2.6 Actors
2.6.1 Overview
2.6.2 Customer domain characteristics
2.6.3 Grid-side, customer-side, and SGUI actors
28 2.7 Quality requirements
2.7.1 General
29 2.7.2 Security and privacy
2.7.3 Scalability and performance
30 2.7.4 Maintainability
3 Country actions and perspective on Smart Grid user interface
3.1 General
3.2 Overview of country experiences
3.2.1 China perspective
31 3.2.2 U.S. perspective
32 Figure 6 – NIST smart grid conceptual model (from NIST Framework 2.0)
33 3.2.3 European perspective
34 3.2.4 France perspective
Figure 7 – Architectural details of the EN 50491-12 CEM framework
35 Figure 8 – Example COSEI architecture diagrams
37 Tables
Table 1 – Correspondence between hardware components in smart homes and their potential integrated functional components
38 3.2.5 Korea perspective
39 3.2.6 Japan perspective
3.2.7 India perspective
Table 2 – Korean framework domains and relation to SGUI
Table 3 – Four regional demonstration tests in Japan
40 3.3 Use cases from PC 118 member countries
3.3.1 General
3.3.2 China use cases
Table 4 – China use case classification and use case summary
41 3.3.3 Korea use cases
3.3.4 Japan use cases
3.3.5 France use cases
Table 5 – Korea use case category table summary
Table 6 – Japan use case category table summary
Table 7 – France use case category table summary
42 3.3.6 India use cases
3.3.7 U.S. use cases
Table 8 – India use case category table summary
43 3.4 Use case analysis
3.4.1 General
3.4.2 Service and control interactions
Table 9 – U.S. use case category table summary
44 3.4.3 Use case taxonomy
3.4.4 Analysis and classification of use cases
Table 10 – SGUI functional use case classes (UCC) and descriptions
45 Figure 9 – Summary classification of submitted use caseswith three interaction styles
Figure 10 – Cross-tabulations of use cases by category with three interaction styles
46 3.4.5 Summary of use case analysis
3.5 Special considerations
3.5.1 General
3.5.2 Meter interactions
47 3.5.3 Electric vehicles and other storage
4 Smart grid user interface standards
4.1 General
4.2 Overview of existing standards
48 Figure 11 – Classification of standards in the following tables based on SGUI (Table 11), grid-side domains (Table 12) and facility-side domain (Table 13)
Table 11 – Standards relevant to the SGUI
49 Table 12 – Standards relevant to the grid-side of the SGUI
51 Table 13 – Standards relevant to the facility-side of the SGUI
52 4.3 Standards gap context
4.3.1 General
4.3.2 Standards gap analysis procedure
53 4.3.3 Use case classification system
Figure 12 – Smart Grid architecture model
54 4.4 Use case classes and relevant standards
4.4.1 General
4.4.2 UCC 1—Interact with markets
Table 14 – Use case classes and relevant use cases
Table 15 – Functional systems and relevant use cases
56 Table 16 – Relevant standards for use case class 1
57 4.4.3 UCC 2—Convey price information
58 Table 17 – Relevant standards for use case class 2
60 4.4.4 UCC 3—Ancillary services
61 Table 18 – Relevant standards for use case class 3
63 4.4.5 UCC 4—DR & DER requests and supporting services
64 Table 19 – Relevant standards for use case class 4
66 4.4.6 UCC 5—Impending power failure or instability
67 Table 20 – Relevant standards for use case class 5
68 4.4.7 UCC 6—Directed interaction and direct load control
69 Table 21 – Relevant standards for use case class 6
71 4.4.8 UCC 7—Historical, present and future projection information
72 Table 22 – Relevant standards for use case class 7
73 4.4.9 UCC 8—Monitoring and energy efficiency analysis
74 Table 23 – Relevant standards for use case class 8
75 4.5 Smart Grid user interface standards gap analysis conclusions
76 5 Recommendations for IEC SGUI standards development
5.1 General
5.2 OpenADR 2.0
77 5.3 OASIS Energy Interoperation
5.4 Smart Energy SEP 2.0
78 Annex A (informative) IEC establishment and history of PC 118
79 Figure A.1 – Consensus reference drawing for PC 118 work relative to other TCs
80 Table A.1 – Chart used for capturing existing solutions during PC 118 meetings
81 Figure A.2 – Top-down approach to identify industry expectations
Figure A.3 – Questions to be addressed by PC 118 working groups leading to work plan
82 Figure A.4 – Conceptual work plan for PC 118
83 Annex B (informative) SGUI perspective – More details
B.1 General
B.2 European standardization for Smart Grid realization in buildings
Figure B.1 – Reference architecture for smart metering communications [19]
84 Figure B.2 – Expanded smart metering reference architecture
85 Figure B.3 – European functional architecture
Figure B.4 – Reality of multiple HBES in market
86 B.3 DR through smart meter infrastructure (France)
Figure B.5 – Common framework with one standard interface for mapping to any HBES
87 Figure B.6 – DR through smart meter infrastructure, without (Internet) e-Box
Figure B.7 – DR through smart meter infrastructure, with (Internet) e-Box
88 Table B.1 – DR infrastructure comparison – Services and roles
89 Annex C (informative) Use cases
C.1 General
C.2 China use cases
C.2.1 CN01 – Use case of generic use cases
C.2.2 CN02 – Use case of demand response
C.2.3 CN03 – Use case of energy efficiency
90 C.2.4 CN04 – Use case of distributed energy resource
C.2.5 CN05 – Use case of electric vehicle charging
C.2.6 CN06 – Use case of load management
C.3 Korea use cases
92 C.4 Japan use cases
C.4.1 General
C.4.2 JP01 – Control battery via home energy management system (HEMS)
Table C.1 – Summary of Japanese use cases
93 C.4.3 JP02 – Control distributed energy resources (DER) via home energy management system (HEMS)
C.4.4 JP03 – Control energy consumption with smart appliances by building energy management system (BEMS)
C.4.5 JP04 – Control energy consumption with smart appliances by community EMS
94 C.4.6 JP05 – Control energy consumption with smart appliances by energy provider
C.4.7 JP06 – Control energy consumption via home energy management system (HEMS) with smart appliances
C.4.8 JP07 – Peak shift contribution by battery aggregation (virtual energy storage)
C.4.9 JP08 – Control of smart home appliances based on price information by time slot
95 C.4.10 JP09 – Control of smart home appliances in response to power saving request from electric power supplier
C.4.11 JP10 – Control of smart home appliance before power cut
96 C.4.12 JP11 – Control of smart home appliances in case of natural disaster
C.5 France use cases
C.5.1 General
C.5.2 FR01 – Load control for electrical water heating tank coupled with on/off peak tariff
Table C.2 – Summary of French use cases
97 C.5.3 FR02 – Dynamic pricing of electricity and energy management
98 C.5.4 FR03 – Managing a superseding tariff schedule (peak demand) UC_PC_14
100 C.5.5 FR04 Handle a tariff event through managed equipment UC_PC_16
101 C.5.6 FR05 – Handling a tariff event by local intelligence UC_PC_17
102 C.6 India use cases
C.6.1 IN01 – Energy efficiency
103 C.6.2 IN02 – Demand response for peak load reduction
C.6.3 IN03 – Home energy management
C.6.4 IN04 – Building energy management
104 C.6.5 IN05 – Local markets to enable consumer-prosumer open access transactions
105 C.6.6 IN06 – Deliver output reports of demand side equipment in standardized data formats to users
106 Annex D (informative) Standards
D.1 Short summary of Clause 4 relevant standards
D.1.1 General
D.1.2 ISO/IEC 15067-3
D.1.3 ISO/IEC 15045 series
D.1.4 ISO/IEC 18012 series
D.1.5 ISO/IEC 14543 series
D.1.6 ISO/IEC 14543-3 (EN 50090) KNX
107 D.1.7 ISO/IEC 14908-1
D.1.8 ISO 16484-5 (ASHRAE/ANSI 135)
D.1.9 ISO 17800 (ASHRAE/NEMA 201P)
108 D.1.10 ISO/IEC 14762
D.1.11 ISO/IEC 29145
D.1.12 ISO/IEC 30100
D.1.13 IEC 61158-6
D.1.14 IEC 61400-25 series
109 D.1.15 IEC 61588
D.1.16 IEC TR 61850-90-7
110 D.1.17 IEC TR 61850-90-8
D.1.18 IEC 61968 series
111 D.1.19 IEC 61970 series
D.1.20 IEC 62056 series
D.1.21 IEC 62325 series
112 D.1.22 IEC 62351 series
D.1.23 IEC 62394
D.1.24 IEC 62480
D.1.25 IEC 62488 series
113 D.1.26 IEC 62746 series
D.1.27 IEC TS 62872
D.1.28 OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0
D.1.29 OpenADR 2.0 (IEC PAS 62746-10-1)
D.1.30 OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange
114 D.1.31 OASIS WS-Calendar
D.1.32 CENELEC EN 50491-12
D.1.33 IEEE P2030.5 Smart Energy Profile 2.0
D.1.34 ECHONET
115 D.1.35 ANSI/CEA-2045, Modular Communication Interface
D.1.36 AS/NZS 4755
D.1.37 IEEE 1547
116 D.2 Additional standards information
D.2.1 General
D.2.2 Standard: OASIS Energy Interoperation (EI)
117 Figure D.1 – Energy Interoperation directed interaction graph
118 D.2.3 Standard: OpenADR 2.0 Profile Specification (OpenADR 2.0)
D.2.4 Standard: Smart Energy Profile (SEP) 2.0
121 D.2.5 Standard: NAESB REQ.21: Energy Services Provider Interface (ESPI)
122 Figure D.2 – ESPI automated exchange use cases
123 Figure D.3 – Overview of ESPI actors
124 D.2.6 Standard: ASHRAE/NEMA 201P Facility Smart Grid Information Model (FSGIM)
125 D.2.7 Standard: ANSI/CEA-2045: Modular Communication Interface
127 Figure D.4 – Modular interface concept
128 Figure D.5 – CEA-2045 modular interface layers
129 Bibliography

Related products

BSI PD IEC/TR 62939-1:2014
$215.11