03.100.60 – Accountancy – PDF Standards Store ?u= Tue, 05 Nov 2024 20:00:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 ?u=/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/cropped-icon-150x150.png 03.100.60 – Accountancy – PDF Standards Store ?u= 32 32 IEC SRD 63234-2:2020 ?u=/product/publishers/iec/iec-srd-63234-22020/ Tue, 05 Nov 2024 20:00:09 +0000 Economic evaluation of active assisted living services - Part 2: Example of use - Monitoring patients with chronic diseases
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
IEC 2020-02-19 28
]]>
IEC SRD 63234-1:2020 provides a descriptive framework and template for the economic evaluation of the implementation of technology-supported home healthcare, wellness or AAL services. IEC SRD 63234-2:2020 provides an example of the use of the framework, specifically analysis and economic evaluation of the implementation of technology-supported, remote, in-home monitoring of patients (AAL care recipients) with chronic diseases.
This analysis is completed from the point of view of the healthcare system/services funder (e.g. the government in a state-sponsored healthcare system or possibly a health management/health insurance company in a privately funded system).
This document is structured like IEC SRD 63234-1:2020, to provide a means of capturing data for the Reference Scenario (the current means of providing care, also known as 'usual care', to the target population of members of the population with one or more chronic diseases living at home), compared against an Alternate Scenario (the deployment of an AAL service which provides remote patient monitoring). Standard economic measures have been estimated (using an electronic spreadsheet) including Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback Period of the investment.

]]>
IEC SRD 63234-1:2020 ?u=/product/publishers/iec/iec-srd-63234-12020/ Tue, 05 Nov 2024 20:00:09 +0000 Economic evaluation of active assisted living services - Part 1: Framework
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
IEC 2020-02-19 34
]]>
IEC SRD 63234-1:2020 provides a descriptive framework and template for the economic evaluation of the implementation of technology-supported home healthcare or wellness services, or AAL services that support communications, transportation, etc. as defined in a series of AAL use cases. The financial analysis is completed from the point of view of the healthcare services funder, aged care services funder, or similar governmental or non-governmental organization (e.g. the government in a state-sponsored system or possibly a health management/health insurance company in a privately funded system, a private or governmental organization financing delivery of home support or specialized transportation services).
This document is structured to provide a means of capturing data for a Reference Scenario (typically the current means of providing care, often known as 'usual care', to the target patient population) to compare against an Alternate Scenario (the service or technology intervention) for an economic comparison. Standard economic measures can be estimated (using an electronic spreadsheet or other analysis tool) such as Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback Period of the investment.
This document is applicable to all potential AAL services and AAL systems that may be developed or the development and manufacture of any of the underlying components (whether hardware or software).

]]>
CAN/CSA-Q850-F97 (C2007):2000 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/csa/can-csa-q850-f97-c2007/ Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:40:36 +0000 Gestion du risque: Lignes directrices à l’intention des décideurs
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
CSA 2000-01-18 65
]]>
Domaine d’application

1.1
Le guide CAN/CSA-Q850 vise à aider les décideurs à gérer efficacement les différents types de risques, notamment les risques de blessure et de danger pour la santé, les biens, l'environnement et toute autre valeur.

1.2
Ce guide explique le processus d'acquisition, d'analyse, d'évaluation et de communication de l'information nécessaire à la prise de décision.

1.3
Ce guide décrit, point par point, les principales composantes du processus décisionnel relatif à la gestion des risques, ainsi que les liens entre ces composantes.

1.4
Sont exclus de cette norme: (a) définition ou prescriptions légales de la gestion des risques; (b) base nécessaire pour l'admissibilité à une assurance, à un prêt ou autres considérations financières; (c) outils techniques précis pour l'analyse, l'évaluation et la réduction des risques. Note. La CSA a produit des guides sur l'analyse des risques (norme CAN/CSA-Q634) et l'évaluation des risques environnementaux (norme CSA Z763).

]]>
CAN/CSA-Q850-97 (R2009):1997 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/csa/can-csa-q850-97-r2009/ Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:40:35 +0000 Risk Management: Guideline for Decision Makers
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
CSA 1997 62
]]>
Scope

1.1
CSA Guideline CAN/CSA-Q850 is intended to assist decision- makers in effectively managing all types of risk issues, i ncluding injury or damage to health, property, the environment, or something else of value.

1.2
This Guideline describes a process for acquiring, analyzi ng, evaluating, and communicating information that is necessary for decision-making.

1.3
This Guideline provides a description of the major components of the risk management decision process, and their relationship to each other, in a step-by-step process.

1.4
This Guideline does not provide (a) a legal definition or specification for risk management; (b) a necessary basis for qualifying for insurance, a monetary loan, or other financial considerations; or (c) specific technical tools for risk analysis, evaluation, and control. Note: CSA has developed guidance documents to address risk analysis (CSA Standard CAN/CSA-Q634) and environmental risk assessment (CSA Standard Z763).

]]>
ASTM-E2516:2024 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/astm/astm-e2516-5/ Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:14:19 +0000 E2516-11(2024) Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ASTM 2024
]]>
ASTM E2516-11-Reapproved2024

Active Standard: Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System

ASTM E2516

Scope

1.1 This classification provides a generic classification system for cost estimates and provides guidelines for applying the classification to cost estimates.

1.2 This classification maps the phases and stages of cost estimating to a generic maturity and quality matrix, keyed to a degree of project definition, that can be applied across a wide variety of industries.

1.3 The Cost Estimate Classification System has been developed in a way that:

1.3.1 Provides a common understanding of the concepts involved with classifying cost estimates;

1.3.2 Defines and correlates the major characteristics used in classifying cost estimates, and;

1.3.3 Uses the degree of project definition as the primary characteristic used to categorize estimate classes.

1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Keywords

bid/tender; class 1 estimate; class 2 estimate; class 3 estimate; class 4 estimate; class 5 estimate; class of estimate; cost estimate; cost estimate classification methodology; degree of project definition; deterministic; effort to prepare estimates; end usage; estimate classification; estimate classification matrix; estimating methodology; expected accuracy range; life cycle; maturity and quality matrix; project; stochastic;

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 03.100.60 (Accountancy)

DOI: 10.1520/E2516-11R24

]]>
BS 8453:2011 ?u=/product/publishers/bsi/bs-84532011/ Sun, 20 Oct 2024 01:10:13 +0000 Compliance framework for regulated financial services firms. Specification
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2011 22
]]>
This British Standard specifies overarching policies, procedures and methods for operating a compliance framework (see Clause 4) within a regulated financial services firm.

This standard sets out a methodology for implementing and managing the compliance framework at both group and line level.

The extent to which the requirements of this standard are applicable to an individual firm depends on the nature, size and complexity of the firm’s business.

NOTE Firms may implement this standard in a way that is relevant, appropriate and proportionate to their business model.

The standard does not specify requirements for risk management, data protection (covered in BIP 0012 and BS 10012), complaints handling (covered in BS ISO 10002), or inclusive service provision (covered in BS 18477).

]]>
BS ISO 10668:2010 ?u=/product/publishers/bsi/bs-iso-106682010/ Sun, 20 Oct 2024 01:09:46 +0000 Brand valuation. Requirements for monetary brand valuation
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2010 22
]]>
This International Standard specifies requirements for procedures and methods of monetary brand value measurement.

This International Standard specifies a framework for brand valuation, including objectives, bases of valuation, approaches to valuation, methods of valuation and sourcing of quality data and assumptions. It also specifies methods for reporting the results of such valuation.

]]>
BSI 20/30400133 DC:2020 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/bsi/bsi-20-30400133-dc/ Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:31:18 +0000 BS EN 17463. Methodology for the Valuation of Energy Related Investments (ValERI)
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2020 65
]]>
This document specifies requirements for a valuation of energy related investments (VALERI). It provides a description on how to gather, calculate, evaluate and document information in order to create solid business cases based on Net Present Value calculations for ERIs. The standard is applicable for the valuation of any kind of energy related investment. The document focusses mainly on the valuation and documentation of the economical impacts of ERIs. However, non-economical effects (e.g. noise reduction) that may occur through undertaking an investment are considered as well. Thus, qualitative effects (e.g. impact on the environment)– even if they are non-monetisable – are taken into consideration.

]]>
ASTM-E2516:2019 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/astm/astm-e2516-4/ Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:40:26 +0000 E2516-11(2019) Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ASTM 2019 7
]]>
ASTM E2516-11-Reapproved2019

Historical Standard: Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System

ASTM E2516

Scope

1.1 This classification provides a generic classification system for cost estimates and provides guidelines for applying the classification to cost estimates.

1.2 This classification maps the phases and stages of cost estimating to a generic maturity and quality matrix, keyed to a degree of project definition, that can be applied across a wide variety of industries.

1.3 The Cost Estimate Classification System has been developed in a way that:

1.3.1 provides a common understanding of the concepts involved with classifying cost estimates;

1.3.2 defines and correlates the major characteristics used in classifying cost estimates, and;

1.3.3 uses the degree of project definition as the primary characteristic used to categorize estimate classes.

1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Keywords

bid/tender; class 1 estimate; class 2 estimate; class 3 estimate; class 4 estimate; class 5 estimate; class of estimate; cost estimate; cost estimate classification methodology; degree of project definition; deterministic; effort to prepare estimates; end usage; estimate classification; estimate classification matrix; estimating methodology; expected accuracy range; life cycle; maturity and quality matrix; project; stochastic;

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 03.100.60 (Accountancy)

DOI: 10.1520/E2516-11R19

]]>
ASTM-E2516:2006 Edition ?u=/product/publishers/astm/astm-e2516-3/ Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:09:42 +0000 E2516-06 Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System
Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ASTM 2006 7
]]>

1.1 This classification provides a generic classification system for cost estimates and provides guidelines for applying the classification to cost estimates.

1.2 This classification maps the phases and stages of cost estimating to a generic maturity and quality matrix, keyed to a level of project definition, that can be applied across a wide variety of industries.

1.3 The Cost Estimate Classification System has been developed in a way that:

1.3.1 provides a common understanding of the concepts involved with classifying cost estimates;

1.3.2 defines and correlates the major characteristics used in classifying cost estimates, and;

1.3.3 uses the degree of project definition as the primary characteristic used to categorize estimate classes.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
1 Scope
Referenced Documents
Terminology
Significance and Use
2 Basis of Classification
Estimate Characteristics
FIG. 1
3 Relationships and Variations of Estimate Characteristics: Discussion
4 Keywords
5 X1. GUIDANCE NOTES
X1.1
X1.2
X1.3
X1.4
X1.5
FIG. 2
6 FIG. 3
]]>