It is applicable to data provided by human processes or by building automation, control, information technology, or even accounting systems. If the building information system (BIS) is accessible by the EnMT, the BIS can facilitate the provision of data and information. This could include data used in determining significant energy uses (SEUs), managing to improve energy performance (including energy consumption, energy use and energy efficiency) through to the use of energy performance indicators (EnPIs).

This document does not apply to:

— residential or industrial buildings;

— buildings containing an industrial process where the industrial processes cannot be separated from other uses.

However, many of the principles in this document can be applied to these or other types of buildings.

NOTE Industrial processes can include manufacturing, packaging, transportation, assembly, etc.

It does not apply to building automation data communication protocols themselves.

It is does not consider the selection of energy management software, hardware and control algorithms for automatically managing buildings.

Where relevant this document takes into account work and documents from other organizations and committees, such as buildingSMART, International (bSI), Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). The focus is to identify future topics for standardization and possible revision needs of existing standards.

This document investigates conceptual and technological barriers between GIS and BIM domains at the data, service and process levels, as defined by ISO 11354 (all parts).

electronic system (HES) architecture. The interaction of building and home control systems

requires a demarcation between building manager versus tenant responsibilities. A method for

implementing agreements between building managers and tenants regarding user access to

and control of applications via a firewall is specified.

This technical report augments series ISO/IEC 14543, the architecture of HES (Home

Electronic System), in order to accommodate both home and building automation in a mixeduse

building. Both systems may coexist in a building with shops, offices and apartments. Some

systems are applicable to the whole building versus the systems which are applicable to

individual apartments and offices only. In some cases these systems need to interact.

This technical report proposes a logical model for linking building and home control systems

even if the two use different physical arrangements of components. The basic recommendations

are:

??allow for distinct and separate building and home automation control systems, possibly

supplied by different manufacturers;

??define clear points of connection between building and home control systems;

??limit the number of points of connection between building and home control systems,

preferably to one per home system;

??accommodate systems that provide building tenants with user control of local systems. This

favors an architecture where products can be designed for the user to override control

decisions within parameters agreed with building management. Such actions are exercised

by the building automation system and affect local systems. This enhances user safety and

user privacy;

??provide seamless links between systems that are based on different architectures, that

incorporate different communications protocols, and that may be purchased from different

manufacturers.