93.080.01 – Road engineering in general – PDF Standards Store

JIS A 1215:1980

Wed, 06 Nov 2024 01:36:41 +0000

Method of Plate Load Test on Soils for Road

Published By	Publication Date	Number of Pages
JIS	1980-04-18	6

SA TS 5719:2017

Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:03:07 +0000

Scope

This Technical Specification defines the physical means and protocols to be used to communicate with dynamic message signs (DMS) and road weather information systems (RWIS). Where necessary, the functionality required to implement the protocol is described.
NOTES:
1 For the purpose of this Technical Specification DMS consist of variable message signs (VMS), changeable message signs (CMS), electronic speed limit signs (ESLS), lane use signs (LUS) and school zone alert signs (SZAS).
2 This communication protocol also supports the display of travel times on VMS.

AS 1743:2018

Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:33:10 +0000

Road signs - Specifications

Published By	Publication Date	Number of Pages
AS	2018-03-26	461

AS 1742.11:2016

Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:33:03 +0000

Specifies the signs and pavement markings to be used for indicating areas of a road available for parking or where parking is restricted or prohibited, on a part-time or full-time basis by means of either linear or area parking control.

Scope

This Standard specifies the signs and pavement markings to be used for indicating areas of a road –
(a) available or reserved for parking;
(b) where parking is restricted or prohibited; and
(c) where stopping is restricted or prohibited;
on a part-time or full-time basis by means of either linear or area parking control.
Guidance is given in appendices on the illumination and reflectorization of signs, on their location and installation, and on how to design parking control signs.
For other aspects of parking, including the layout and design of and access arrangements for parking bays and parking facilities, refer to the parts of the AS(AS/NZS) 2890 series.

AS 1348:2002

Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:27:46 +0000

Glossary of terms - Roads and traffic engineering

Published By	Publication Date	Number of Pages
AS	2002-04-05	184

ASTM-D6951/D6951M:2023 Edition

Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:24:21 +0000

ASTM D6951/D6951M-18-Reapproved2023

Active Standard: Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications

ASTM D6951/D6951M

Scope

1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the penetration rate of the dynamic cone penetrometer with an 8 kg [17.6 lb] hammer (8 kg [17.6 lb] DCP) through undisturbed soil or compacted materials, or both. The penetration rate may be related to in situ strength such as an estimated in situ CBR (California Bearing Ratio). A soil density may be estimated (Note 1) if the soil type and moisture content are known. The DCP described in this test method is typically used for pavement applications.

1.2 The test method provides for an optional 4.6 kg [10.1 lb] sliding hammer when the use of the 8 kg [17.6 lb] sliding mass produces excessive penetration in soft ground conditions.

1.3 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Keywords

ADCP; aggregate base testing; California Bearing Ratio; CBR; DCP; disposable cones; dual-mass hammer; dynamic cone penetrometer; in situ testing; paving material testing; shear strength; subgrade testing;

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 93.080.01 (Road engineering in general)

DOI: 10.1520/D6951_D6951M-18R23

ASTM-E3008/E3008M 2023

Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:34:04 +0000

ASTM E3008/E3008M-16-Reapproved2023

Active Standard: Standard Classification for Transportation Surface Elements—UNIFORMAT II

ASTM E3008/E3008M

Scope

1.1 This standard establishes a classification of transportation surface elements within the UNIFORMAT II family of elemental classifications. It covers the full breadth of vehicular transportation surfaces, from rural roads to multi-lane interstate highways.

1.2 UNIFORMAT II classifications have an elemental format similar to the original UNIFORMAT2 building elemental classification. However, the title UNIFORMAT II differs from the original in that it now takes into consideration a wide range of constructed entities that collectively form the built environment.

1.3 Elements, as defined here and in Classifications E1557 and E2103/E2103M, are major physical components that are common within constructed entities. Elements perform their given function(s), regardless of the design specification, construction method, or materials used.

1.4 This elemental classification serves as a consistent reference for analysis, evaluation, and monitoring during the feasibility, planning, and design stages when constructing transportation surfaces.

1.5 Using UNIFORMAT II elemental classifications ensures a consistency in the economic evaluation of construction projects over time and from project to project.

1.6 UNIFORMAT II classifications also enhance reporting at all stages of a constructed entity’s life cycle—from feasibility and planning through the preparation of working documents, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, and disposal.

1.7 This classification is unsuitable for process applications or for preparing trade estimates.

1.8 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.

1.9 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.10 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Keywords

construction; design economics; economic analysis; economic evaluation; elemental/systems classification; elemental transportation surface classification; life-cycle costing; master schedules; outline specifications; preliminary project description; risk analysis; sitework; standard classifications of transportation surface systems; transportation surface assemblies; transportation surface cost estimation; transportation surface cost planning; transportation surface elemental format; transportation surface elements; transportation surface functional elements; transportation surface systems classification; UNIFORMAT II; value engineering;

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 93.080.01 (Road engineering in general)

DOI: 10.1520/E3008_E3008M-16R23

ASTM-E1778:2008 Edition

Sun, 20 Oct 2024 05:21:30 +0000

1.1 This terminology provides definitions for pavement distress for airfields, highways, roads, streets, and parking lots of all functional classifications.

1.2 This terminology covers surfaces paved with either bituminous or portland cement concrete. It does not include other paved or unpaved surfaces.

1.3 This terminology includes most of the significant types of pavement surface distresses, but it is not all inclusive.

1.4 Not all distresses noted are applicable to all pavement categories listed in 1.1.

1.5 Severity levels are not addressed in this terminology but are addressed in other ASTM test methods and practices (for example, Test Method D 5340 ). However, a knowledge of severity levels is required for evaluating many of the distresses defined in this terminology.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages	PDF Title
1	Scope Referenced Documents Terminology
2	Significance and Use
3	Hazards

ASTM-E1778:2002 Edition

Sun, 20 Oct 2024 05:21:23 +0000

1.1 This terminology provides definitions for pavement distress for airfields, highways, roads, streets, and parking lots of all functional classifications.

1.2 This terminology covers surfaces paved with either bituminous or portland cement concrete. It does not include other paved or unpaved surfaces.

1.3 This terminology includes most of the significant types of pavement surface distresses, but it is not all inclusive.

1.4 Not all distresses noted are applicable to all pavement categories listed in 1.1.

1.5 Severity levels are not addressed in this terminology but are addressed in other ASTM test methods and practices (for example, Test Method D 5340). However, a knowledge of severity levels is required for evaluating many of the distresses defined in this terminology.

ASTM-E1777:2002 Edition

Sun, 20 Oct 2024 05:21:11 +0000

1.1 This guide identifies data needs for pavement management systems. It also addresses the relative importance of various types of pavement data.

1.2 This guide was developed for use by federal, state, and local agencies, as well as consultants who provide services to those agencies.

1.3 This guide describes a process and provides a set of recommendations that any agency may use to develop a plan for acquiring pavement management data. Any individual agency may justifiably assign higher or lower priority to specified data items depending on their needs and policy.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages	PDF Title
1	Scope Referenced Documents
2	Significance and Use Data Types and Acquisition Methods Sample Size and Frequency Uses of Data
3	TABLE 2 TABLE 1
4	Factors in Establishing Priorities
5	Priority of Data Needs Guidelines TABLE 3
6	Data Storage Examples TABLE 4 TABLE 5
7	X1. SMALL AGENCY EXAMPLE X1.1 X1.2 X1.3 Historically Related X1.4 Policy Related
8	X2. LARGE AGENCY EXAMPLE X2.1 X2.2 Performance Related X2.3 Historically Related X2.4 Environmental Related X2.5 Policy Related
9	X3. AIRPORT EXAMPLE X3.1 X3.2 Performance Related X3.3 Historically Related X3.4 Environmental Related