{"id":166884,"date":"2024-10-19T10:08:16","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T10:08:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/fema-p-1026-508-2015\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T02:27:02","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T02:27:02","slug":"fema-p-1026-508-2015","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/fema\/fema-p-1026-508-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"FEMA P 1026 508 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"
None<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | FEMA P-1026: Seismic Design of Rigid Wall-Flexible Diaphragm Buildings: An Alternate Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
3<\/td>\n | Title Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | Disclaimer <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
6<\/td>\n | Preface <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Acknowledgments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | List of Tables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | List of Figures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | Acronyms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Chapter 1 Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 1.1 The Need for a New Design Procedure for RWFD Buildings 1.2 Purpose of Report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 1.3 Introduction to the Alternate Procedure and Comparison toCurrent Design Practice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 1.4 Implementation of the Alternate Design Procedure 1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Alternate Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 1.6 Overview of Report Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | Chapter 2 Description of RWFD Buildings and Their Performance in Earthquakes 2.1 Description of Typical RWFD Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 2.2 Seismic Performance History <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Chapter 3 Current Design Practice Example 3.1 Example Building Description (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 3.2 Determine Design Spectral Response Accelerations SDS and SD1(current practice) 3.3 Determine Fundamental Building Period (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 3.4 Base Shear Using the ELF Procedure (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 3.5 Diaphragm Design Forces Using the ELF Procedure (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 3.6 North\/South Diaphragm Shear Design (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | 3.7 North\/South Diaphragm Chord Design (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 3.8 East\/West Diaphragm Shear Design (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 3.9 East\/West Diaphragm Chord Design (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 3.10 Shear Wall Force Using the ELF Procedure (current practice) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 3.11 Shortcomings of Current Practice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | Chapter 4 Development of an Alternate Seismic Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | 4.1 Determination of Building and Diaphragm Period <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | 4.2 Response Modification Coefficient, R, Selection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 4.2.1 Encouraging Distributed Inelastic Behavior <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | 4.2.2 Diaphragm Response Modification Coefficient and Shear Amplification <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | 4.3 Deflection Amplification Factor, Cd , Selection 4.4 Overstrength Factor, \u03a9o, Selection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | 4.5 Overview of the Alternate Seismic Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Chapter 5 Implementation of the Alternate Seismic Design Procedure 5.1 A Two-Stage ELF Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | 5.2 First Stage \u2013 Diaphragm Design 5.3 Diaphragm Design Coefficient Cs Using the ELF Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | 5.4 Diaphragm Forces Using the ELF Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
75<\/td>\n | 5.5 North\/South Diaphragm Shear Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | 5.6 North\/South Diaphragm Shear Transfer to Walls 5.7 North\/South Diaphragm Chord Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | 5.8 East\/West Diaphragm Shear Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | 5.9 East\/West Diaphragm Shear Transfer to Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 5.10 East\/West Diaphragm Chord Design 5.11 Second Stage \u2013 Shear Wall Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | 5.12 Shear Wall Force Using the ELF Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | 5.13 Limitations and Adaptations of the Alternate Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Chapter 6 Diaphragm Deflection Check 6.1 Deflection of North\/South Diaphragm <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | 6.2 Deflection of North\/South Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | 6.3 Limits on Diaphragm Deflection \u2013 Deformation Compatibility 6.4 Limits on Diaphragm Deflection \u2013 Second Order Effects and P-\u0394 Instability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | 6.5 Limits on Diaphragm Deflection \u2013 Building Separations and Setbacks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | Chapter 7 Comparison of Designs Using Current Practiceand Alternate Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
105<\/td>\n | Chapter 8 Future Studies for Design of RWFD Buildings 8.1 Steel Deck Diaphragms 8.2 Out-of-Plane Top of Wall Anchorage Forces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | 8.3 In-Plane Wall Yielding\/Rocking 8.4 Irregular Plan Shapes and Abrupt Changes along Exterior Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
107<\/td>\n | 8.5 Combining Connector Forces from Shear Acting in Two OrthogonalDirections 8.6 Forces on Continuity Ties 8.7 Three-Dimensional Modeling Calibrated to the Response of Buildingsand Tests 8.8 Deflection of Wood Diaphragms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
108<\/td>\n | 8.9 Applicability to Buildings with Lightweight Enclosures and SteelBracing 8.10 Applicability to Multi-Story Buildings 8.11 Implications of Diaphragm Deflections on Structural and Nonstructural Elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
109<\/td>\n | 8.12 Large-Scale Diaphragm Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
111<\/td>\n | Chapter 9 Conclusions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
113<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
117<\/td>\n | Appendices APPENDIX A Alternate Design Procedure Discussionand Commentary A.1 Commentary on Alternate Design Procedure with Diaphragm Yielding <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
121<\/td>\n | A.2 Limitations of the Alternate Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
122<\/td>\n | A.3 Applicability of Alternate Design Procedure to RWFD Buildings with Steel Deck Diaphrams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
123<\/td>\n | A.4 Discussion of Diaphragm Yielding A.5 Quality of Design, Construction and Inspection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
124<\/td>\n | A.6 Diaphragm Modifications and Deterioration A.7 Possible Code Provisions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
129<\/td>\n | APPENDIX B Evaluating RWFD Buildings Using FEMA P695 Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
131<\/td>\n | B.1 Modeling Framework <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
134<\/td>\n | B.2 Modeling Framework Validation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
137<\/td>\n | APPENDIX C List of Connectors in Database <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
139<\/td>\n | APPENDIX D Evaluation of Current Design Procedure D.1 Description of Archetypes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
141<\/td>\n | D.2 Summary of FEMA P695 Analysis Results for Current Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
144<\/td>\n | D.3 Fundamental Period of the Archetypes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
147<\/td>\n | APPENDIX E Description of Archetypes for Current Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
163<\/td>\n | APPENDIX G Evaluation of Alternate Design Procedure G.1 Description of Archetypes G.2 Summary of FEMA P695 Analysis Results for the Alternate DesignProcedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | G.3 Overstrength and Deflection Amplification Factors for the Diaphragm <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
167<\/td>\n | Appendix H Description of Archetypes for the Alternate Design Procedure H.1 Description of Archetypes for the Alternate Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
171<\/td>\n | Appendix I FEMA P695 Evaluation Results for theAlternate Design Procedure I.1 FEMA P695 Evaluation Results for Alternate Design Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
175<\/td>\n | APPENDIX J Out-of-Plane Wall and Wall Anchorage Forces J.1 Out-of-Plane Wall and Wall Anchorage Forces; Current Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
176<\/td>\n | J.2 Out-of-plane Wall Anchorage Force Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
179<\/td>\n | J.3 Stiffness of Wall Anchorage Connections J.4 Transfer of Wall Anchorage Forces to Continuous Diaphragm Ties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
181<\/td>\n | APPENDIX K Analysis of Archetypes Using Uniform Nailing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" FEMA P-1026, Seismic Design of Rigid Wall-Flexible Diaphragm Buildings<\/b><\/p>\n |