{"id":182971,"date":"2024-10-19T11:27:07","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T11:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asme-pcc-3-2017\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T03:48:19","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T03:48:19","slug":"asme-pcc-3-2017","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asme\/asme-pcc-3-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"ASME PCC 3 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

The risk analysis principles, guidance, and implementation strategies presented in this Standard are broadly applicable; however, this Standard has been specifically developed for applications involving fixed pressure-containing equipment and components. This Standard is not intended to be used for nuclear power plant components; see ASME BPV, Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components. It provides guidance to owners, operators, and designers of pressure-containing equipment for developing and implementing an inspection program. These guidelines include means for assessing an inspection program and its plan. The approach emphasizes safe and reliable operation through cost-effective inspection. A spectrum of complimentary risk analysis approaches (qualitative through fully quantitative) should be considered as part of the inspection planning process.<\/p>\n

PDF Catalog<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\nPDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nCONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nFOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nASME POST CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE ROSTER <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nCORRESPONDENCE WITH THE POST CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nASME PCC-3-2017 SUMMARY OF CHANGES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n1 SCOPE, INTRODUCTION, AND PURPOSE
1.1 Scope
1.2 Introduction
1.3 Purpose
1.4 Relationship to Regulatory and Jurisdictional Requirements
2 BASIC CONCEPTS
2.1 Risk <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n2.2 Overview of Risk Analysis
Figures
Fig. 2.1 Risk Plot <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n2.3 Inspection Optimization
Fig. 2.3 Management of Risk Using RBI
Table 2.3 Factors Contributing to Loss of Containment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n3 INTRODUCTION TO RISK-BASED INSPECTION
3.1 Items RBI Will Not Compensate for
3.2 Consequence and Probability for Risk-Based Inspection
3.3 Risk Analysis Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nFig. 3.3.1 Continuum of RBI Approaches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n3.4 Understanding How RBI Helps to Manage Operating Risks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n3.5 Inspection Plan
3.6 Management of Risks
Fig. 3.3.4 Risk-Based Inspection Planning Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\n3.7 Relationship Between RBI and Other Risk-Based and Safety Initiatives
3.8 Relationship With Jurisdictional Requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\n4 PLANNING THE RISK ANALYSIS
4.1 Getting Started
4.2 Outcome of the Planning Portion of the Process
4.3 Establish Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\n4.4 Initial Screening <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nFig. 4.4.1 Relationship Among Component, Equipment, System, Process Unit, and Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\n4.5 Selecting a Risk Analysis Approach
4.6 Estimating Resources and Time Required <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\n5 DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTION
5.1 Introduction
5.2 General
5.3 Data Needs and Common Types of Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\n5.4 Data Quality and Validation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\n6 DAMAGE MECHANISMS AND FAILURE MODES
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Identification of Damage Mechanisms
6.3 Damage Mechanisms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\n6.4 Failure Modes
6.5 Accumulated Damage
6.6 Tabulating Results
7 DETERMINING PROBABILITY OF FAILURE
7.1 Introduction to Probability Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\n7.2 Determination of Probability of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\n7.3 Units of Measure for Probability of Failure Analysis
7.4 Types of Probability Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\n8 DETERMINING CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE
8.1 Introduction to Consequence Analysis
8.2 Other Functional Failures
8.3 Types of Consequences and Units of Measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nTables
Table 8.3.5-1 Three-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories
Table 8.3.5-2 Six-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories
Table 8.3.7 Six-Level Table <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\n8.4 Analysis of the Consequence of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\n8.5 Determination of Consequence of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nFig. 8.5 Determination of Consequence of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\n8.6 Volume of Fluid Released
8.7 Hazard Categories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\n9 RISK DETERMINATION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Determination of Risk <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\n9.3 Assumptions
9.4 Sensitivity Analysis
9.5 Risk Communication <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nFig. 9.2.1 Example of Calculating the Probability of a Specific Consequence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nFig. 9.5.1 Example Risk Matrix Using Probability and Consequence Categories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\n9.6 Establishing Acceptable Risk Thresholds
9.7 Risk Management
10 RISK MANAGEMENT WITH INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
10.1 Managing Risk by Reducing Uncertainty Through Inspection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\n10.2 Identifying Opportunities for Risk Reduction From RBI and Probability of Failure Results
10.3 Establishing an Inspection Strategy Based on Risk Analysis
10.4 Managing Risk With Inspection Activities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\n10.5 Managing Inspection Costs With RBI
10.6 Assessing Inspection Results and Determining Corrective Action <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\n10.7 Achieving Lowest Life Cycle Costs With RBI
11 OTHER RISK MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
11.1 General
11.2 Equipment Replacement and Repair
11.3 Fitness-for-Service Assessment
11.4 Equipment Modification, Redesign, and Rerating
11.5 Emergency Isolation
11.6 Emergency Depressurizing\/De-inventory <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\n11.7 Modify Process
11.8 Reduce Inventory
11.9 Water Spray\/Deluge
11.10 Water Curtain
11.11 Blast-Resistant Construction
11.12 Other Mitigation Activities
12 REANALYSIS
12.1 Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\n12.2 When to Conduct RBI Reanalysis
13 ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, TRAINING, AND QUALIFICATIONS
13.1 Interdisciplinary Approach
13.2 RBI Team Roles and Responsibilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\n13.3 Training and Qualifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\n14 DOCUMENTATION AND RECORD KEEPING
14.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51<\/td>\n15 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
15.1 Definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52<\/td>\n15.2 Acronyms
16 REFERENCES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53<\/td>\nTable 16-1 Reference Documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56<\/td>\nTable 16-2 Procurement Information <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
58<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDICES
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A DAMAGE MECHANISM DEFINITIONS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
59<\/td>\nTable A-1 Damage Mechanism Definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
69<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX B DAMAGE MECHANISM AND DEFECTS SCREENING TABLE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
76<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX C TABLE OF EXAMINATION\/MONITORING METHODS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
82<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX D QUANTITATIVE METHODS INCLUDING EXPERT OPINION ELICITATION
D-1 INTRODUCTION
D-2 QUANTITATIVE PROBABILITY ANALYSIS
D-2.1 Definition
D-2.2 Approaches to Quantitative Probability Analysis
D-2.2.1 Objective Approach.
D-2.2.2 Subjective Approach.
D-2.3 Rules of Probability
D-3 FAULT TREE\/EVENT TREE\/DECISION TREE
D-3.1 Tree Structures
D-3.1.1 Event Tree.
D-3.1.2 Fault Tree.
D-3.1.3 Decision Tree. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
83<\/td>\nD-3.2 Event Trees Versus Fault Trees
D-3.3 Fault\/Event Tree Construction
D-3.3.1 Components of Event and Fault Trees
D-3.4 Decision Trees
D-4 MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD
D-4.1 Definition
D-4.2 Methodology
D-4.3 Components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
84<\/td>\nFig. D-4.3 Process of Performing a Monte Carlo Simulation
D-4.4 Inputs
D-4.5 Requirements
D-4.5.1 Probability of Failure With Time.
D-4.5.2 Probabilistic Simulation of Failure.
D-4.5.3 Failure Criterion.
D-4.5.4 Present Damage State From NDE.
D-4.5.5 Operating Environment.
D-4.5.6 Damage Rate Model. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
85<\/td>\nFig. D-5.1 Probability of Failure Rate vs. Time
D-4.5.7 Damage Mechanism.
D-5 LIFETIME RELIABILITY MODELS
D-5.1 Population Lifetime
D-5.2 Periods of the Bathtub Curve
D-5.2.1 Infant Mortality.
D-5.2.2 Constant Failure Rate.
D-5.2.3 Wear-Out Period.
D-5.3 Weibull Distribution <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
86<\/td>\nD-6 GENERIC FAILURE CURVES
D-6.1 Generic Databases
D-6.2 Generic Versus Specific Databases
D-6.2.1 Specific Databases.
D-6.3 Updating Specific and Generic Data
D-6.3.1 Combining Data.
D-6.3.2 Bayes\u0152 Theorem.
D-7 EXPERT ELICITATION AND INTUITIVE OPINION
D-7.1 Description of Process
D-7.2 Characteristics of the Expert Elicitation Process
D-7.2.1 Availability.
D-7.2.2 Unanchoring.
D-7.3 Methods of Elicitation
D-7.3.1 Indirect Intuitive.
D-7.3.2 Direct.
D-7.3.3 Parametric Estimation.
D-7.4 Indirect or Intuitive Opinion Interview Techniques1
D-7.4.1 Plant Personnel Intuition. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
87<\/td>\nD-7.4.2 Interview Steps.
D-7.4.3 Team Approach.
D-7.4.4 Interview Process.
D-7.4.5 Time Estimate to Failure.
D-7.4.6 Determine Relative Probability of Failure. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
88<\/td>\nD-7.4.7 Probability of Failure by Time Increment.
D-7.4.8 Summary of Steps
D-7.5 Direct or Cognitive Expert Elicitation Interview Techniques2
D-7.5.1 Delphi Method.
D-7.5.2 Questions.
D-7.5.3 Combination of Probabilities.
D-8 ASPECTS OF FULLY QUANTITATIVE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS
D-8.1 Definition <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89<\/td>\nD-8.2 Consequence When Few Components
D-8.3 Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence
D-8.4 Probability Distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX E EXAMPLES OF RISK-BASED INSPECTION PROGRAM AUDIT QUESTIONS
E-1 INTRODUCTION
E-2 RBI PROGRAM REVIEW
E-3 INSPECTION PROGRAM TEAM STAFFING <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
91<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX F SUGGESTED PRACTICE FOR EVALUATION OF PRESSURE VESSELS FOR CONTINUED CYCLIC SERVICE
F-1 GENERAL
F-2 DATA AND RECORDS FOR OPERATION BEYOND CYCLIC DESIGN LIMITS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
92<\/td>\nF-3 EXAMINATION FREQUENCY AND DISPOSITION OF RESULTS
F-4 EXEMPTION FROM EXAMINATION
F-5 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
F-6 VESSELS WITH LAYERED SHELLS
F-7 EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ASME PCC-3-2017 Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Published By<\/td>\nPublication Date<\/td>\nNumber of Pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ASME<\/b><\/a><\/td>\n2017<\/td>\n94<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":182974,"template":"","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"product_cat":[2643],"product_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-182971","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-asme","8":"first","9":"instock","10":"sold-individually","11":"shipping-taxable","12":"purchasable","13":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/182971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/182974"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=182971"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=182971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}