{"id":183147,"date":"2024-10-19T11:27:54","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T11:27:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asme-stp-ts-084-2018\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T03:48:50","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T03:48:50","slug":"asme-stp-ts-084-2018","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asme\/asme-stp-ts-084-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"ASME STP TS 084 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"
Orifice Flow Coefficient Equation Comparison. Publisher: ASME Standards Technology LLC Publish Date: 2018 Pages: 93 Language: English ISBN: 9780791871782<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4<\/td>\n | TABLE OF CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 1 DATABASE 1.1 Flange Tap Database <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | Tables Table 1-1: Contribution of Each Testing Facility to the Flange Tap Database Table 1-2: Fluids in the Flange Tap Database <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Table 1-3: Location of Meter-Run Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 1.2 Meter-Run Orifice Plate Combinations Table 1-4: 2-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Table 1-5: 3-inch Meter-Run Plate Combination <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Table 1-6: 4-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Table 1-7: 6-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | Table 1-8: 10-inch Meter-Run Plat Combinations Table 1-9: 24-inch Meter-Run Plate Combinations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 1.3 Distribution of Beta Ratios Figures Figure 1-1: Beta Ratio Distribution of all Data Figure 1-2: 2-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Figure 1-3: 3-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio Figure 1-4: 4-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Figure 1-5: 6-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio Figure 1-6: 10-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 1.4 Corner Tap Database Figure 1-7: 24-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Table 1-10: Contribution of Each Testing Facility to the Corner Tap Database Table 1-11: Fluids in the Corner Tap Database <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 1.5 Distribution of Beta Ratios Figure 1-8: Beta Ratio Distribution of all Data Figure 1-9: 4-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | Figure 1-10: 10-inch Line Size Distribution of Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 2 EQUATIONS 2.1 Flange Tap Equations 2.1.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 2.1.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 2.1.3 AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 2.1.4 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) 2.1.5 Comparison of Equations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | Figure 2-6: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.10 Beta Ratio Figure 2-7: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.40 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | Figure 2-8: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 2-9: Flange Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Figure 2-10: Flange Tap Equations for 3-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-11: Flange Tap Equations for 4-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | Figure 2-12: Flange Tap Equations for 6-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-13: Flange Tap Equations for 10-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 2.2 Corner Tap Equations Figure 2-14: Flange Tap Equations for 24-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 2.2.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 2.2.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) 2.2.3 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 2.2.4 Comparison of Equations Figure 2-18: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.10 Beta Ratio Figure 2-19: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.40 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | Figure 2-20: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.70 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | Figure 2-21: Corner Tap Equations for 2-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-22: Corner Tap Equations for 3-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | Figure 2-23: Corner Tap Equations for 4-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-24: Corner Tap Equations for 6-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Figure 2-25: Corner Tap Equations for 10-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio Figure 2-26: Corner Tap Equations for 24-inch Line Size 0.45 Beta Ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | 3 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | 3.1 Example of Methodology Table 3-1: Limits for Data Compiling in Example Table 3-2: First 6 Rows of Results in Example Table 3-3: Results of Analysis of Points that Met Criteria in Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | Figure 3-1: Graphical Representation of the Data in the Example Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 4 RESULTS 4.1 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) 2004 Flange Tap Table 4-1: Number of Points Meeting ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | Table 4-2: Average Deviation Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | Figure 4-1: 2-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Figure 4-2: 4-inch 0.40-0.45 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | Table 4-3: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-4: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | Table 4-5: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO- RHG) Flange Tap Equation Figure 4-3: 4-inch 0.50-0.55 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Flange TapEquation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 4.2 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Table 4-6: Number of Points Meeting ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Criteria Table 4-7: Average Deviation Results for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | Table 4-8: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-9: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | Table 4-10: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | 4.3 AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Table 4-11: Number of Points Meeting AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | Table 4-12: Average Deviation Results for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | Table 4-13: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-14: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Table 4-15: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for AGA Report Number 3 1990 (AGA-RHG) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 4.4 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Flange Tap Table 4-16: Number of Points Meeting PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | Table 4-17: Average Deviation Results for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | Table 4-18: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Flange Tap Equation Table 4-19: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | Table 4-20: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 4.5 ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) 2004 Corner Tap Table 4-21: Number of Points Meeting ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | Table 4-22: Average Deviation Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-4: 4-inch 0.15-0.20 Beta Ratio Results for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Table 4-23: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation Table 4-24: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | Table 4-25: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO- RHG) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | 4.6 ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Table 4-26: Number of Points Meeting ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | Figure 4-27: Average Deviation Results for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | Figure 4-28: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-29: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Figure 4-30: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation for ISO 5167 1991 (Stoltz) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | 4.7 PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Corner Tap Table 4-31: Number of Points Meeting PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | Figure 4-32: Average Deviation Results for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
75<\/td>\n | Figure 4-33: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Beta Ratio for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation Figure 4-34: Average Deviation from Database Value Regardless of Line Size for PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | Figure 4-35: Number of Standard Deviations between Average Deviation and Equation forPTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Corner Tap Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
77<\/td>\n | 5 EXTRAPOLATION TESTING 5.1 Methodology Figure 5-1: Example of Extrapolation Comparison <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | 5.2 Flange Tap Equation Extrapolation 5.2.1 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-2: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-3: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-4: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-5: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | 5.2.3 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-6: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-7: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | 5.2.4 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-8: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-9: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | 5.2.5 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-10: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-11: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 5.2.6 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-12: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-13: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | 5.2.7 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-14: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-15: Extrapolation Analysis for 6-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | 5.2.8 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-16: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation Figure 5-17: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | 5.3 Corner Tap Equation Extrapolation 5.3.1 6-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio Figure 5-18: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
87<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio Figure 5-19: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.35-0.40 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-20: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
88<\/td>\n | 5.3.3 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio Figure 5-21: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.45-0.50 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-22: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | 5.3.4 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio Figure 5-23: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.55-0.60 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004 (ISO-RHG) Equation Figure 5-24: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio PTC 19.5 Appendix 1 (Keyser) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
90<\/td>\n | Figure 5-25: Extrapolation Analysis for 10-inch 0.65-0.70 Beta Ratio ASME MFC-3M 2004(ISO-RHG) Equation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 6.1 Flange Tap Equations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | 6.2 Corner Tap Equations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ASME STP TS 084 2018 Orifice Flow Coefficient Equation Comparison<\/b><\/p>\n |