{"id":288022,"date":"2024-10-19T19:31:44","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T19:31:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-7974-72019\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T16:25:42","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T16:25:42","slug":"bsi-pd-7974-72019","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-7974-72019\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD 7974-7:2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 4 Design approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | Figure 1 \u2014 Flowchart for demonstrating adequate safety of a design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | Figure 2 \u2014 General flowchart for design assessment using PRA methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | Figure 3 \u2014 Consolidated flowchart for a design through PRA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 5 Acceptance criteria Figure 4 \u2014 One-dimensional representation of generalized consequence-frequency (FC) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | Figure 5 \u2014 Generalized consequence-frequency (FC) diagram with indication of tolerability limit and negligible limit <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Figure 6 \u2014 Flowchart to determine the applicable PRA acceptance criteria for demonstrating adequate safety <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2014 FN diagram (cumulative exceedance frequency versus number of casualties) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 6 Analysis methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | Table 1 \u2014 Summary of discussed methods and main characteristics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | Figure 8 \u2014 Event tree analysis Figure 9 \u2014 Fault tree analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | Figure 10 \u2014 Example of typical uncertainty distribution <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2014 Example of Tornado Chart Showing Contribution to Variance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 7 Data collection for PRA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)\u2002 Acceptance and tolerability criteria Table A.1 \u2014 Individual risk limits Table A.2 \u2014 Parameters and valuation of benchmark proportionality constant SCCR1life Annex B (informative)\u2002 indicative probabilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | Table B.1 \u2014 Sprinkler reliability by occupancy based on USA experience Table B.2 \u2014 Sprinkler effectiveness (%) by occupancy based on NZ experience Table B.3 \u2014 Overall probability of fire starting in various types of occupancy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | Table B.4 \u2014 Fire growth rate distributions Table B.5 \u2014 Fire load energy density for various types of occupancy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Table B.6 \u2014 System effectiveness Table B.7 \u2014 Extent of Damage in USA Fire Incidents, 1989-1994 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative)\u2002 Commentary on acceptance criteria Figure C.1 \u2014 Acceptability criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Application of fire safety engineering principles to the design of buildings – Probabilistic risk assessment<\/b><\/p>\n |