{"id":398264,"date":"2024-10-20T04:34:52","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T04:34:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/ieee-c57-110-2018-2\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T08:23:10","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T08:23:10","slug":"ieee-c57-110-2018-2","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/ieee\/ieee-c57-110-2018-2\/","title":{"rendered":"IEEE C57.110-2018"},"content":{"rendered":"
Revision Standard – Active. Provided in this recommended practice are calculation methods for conservatively evaluating the feasibility for an existing installed dry-type or liquid immersed transformer, to supply nonsinusoidal load currents as a portion of the total load. Also provided is necessary application information to assist in properly specifying a new transformer expected to carry a load, a portion of which is composed of nonsinusoidal load currents. A number of examples illustrating these methods and calculations are presented. Reference annexes provide a comparison of the document calculations to calculations found in other industry standards. Suggested temperature rise calculation methods are detailed for reference purposes.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | IEEE Std C57.110\u2122-2018 Front cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
2<\/td>\n | Title page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | Important Notices and Disclaimers Concerning IEEE Standards Documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Participants <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | IMPORTANT NOTICE 1.\u2002Overview 1.1\u2002Scope 1.2\u2002Purpose 2.\u2002Normative references <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 3.\u2002Definitions 4.\u2002General considerations 4.1\u2002Transformer losses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 4.2\u2002Transformer capability equivalent <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 4.3\u2002Basic data 4.4\u2002Transformer per-unit losses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 4.5\u2002Transformer losses at measured currents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 4.6\u2002Harmonic loss factor10 for winding eddy currents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 4.7\u2002Harmonic loss factor for other stray losses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 5.\u2002Design considerations for new transformer specification 5.1\u2002Harmonic current filtering 5.2\u2002Impact on the neutral 5.3\u2002Power factor correction equipment 5.4\u2002Electrostatic ground shields <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 5.5\u2002Design consideration outside the windings 5.6\u2002Harmonic spectrum analysis 5.7\u2002Design consideration in the windings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 6.\u2002Recommended procedures for evaluating the load capability of existing transformers11 6.1\u2002Transformer capability equivalent calculation using design eddy-current loss data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 6.2\u2002Transformer capability equivalent calculation using data available from certified test report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 6.3\u2002Neutral bus capability for nonsinusoidal load currents that include third harmonic components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0A (informative) Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0B (informative) Tutorial discussion of transformer losses and the effect of harmonic currents on these losses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0C (informative) Corrected harmonic loss factor for high frequencies19 C.1\u2002Transformer winding losses computation using FEM C.2\u2002Corrected harmonic loss factor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | C.3\u2002Example calculation for dry-type transformer <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | C.4\u2002Conclusion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0D (informative) Comparison of UL K-factor definition and IEEE\u00a0Std\u00a0C57.110 harmonic loss factor definition D.1\u2002UL definition of K-factor D.2\u2002Relationship between K-factor and harmonic loss factor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | D.3\u2002Example calculations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0E (informative) Temperature rise testing procedures E.1\u2002Preferred method of performing a temperature rise test21 E.2\u2002Alternative simulated load temperature rise testing procedures22 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0F (informative) Derivation of the ratio of highest winding eddy loss to average F.1\u2002Introduction F.2\u2002Wire wound windings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | F.3\u2002Foil wound windings F.4\u2002Conservative loss ratio estimate <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | Annex\u00a0G (informative) Sample transformer loss data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | Back cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" IEEE Recommended Practice for Establishing Liquid Immersed and Dry-Type Power and Distribution Transformer Capability when Supplying Nonsinusoidal Load Currents<\/b><\/p>\n |