{"id":418996,"date":"2024-10-20T06:23:41","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:23:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asme-pcc-3-2022\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T11:55:40","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T11:55:40","slug":"asme-pcc-3-2022","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asme\/asme-pcc-3-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"ASME PCC 3 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"

The risk analysis principles, guidance, and implementation strategies presented in this Standard are broadly applicable; however, this Standard has been specifically developed for applications involving fixed pressure-containing equipment and components. This Standard is not intended to be used for nuclear power plant components; see ASME BPV, Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components. It provides guidance to owners, operators, and designers of pressure-containing equipment for developing and implementing an inspection program. These guidelines include means for assessing an inspection program and its plan. The approach emphasizes safe and reliable operation through cost-effective inspection. A spectrum of complimentary risk analysis approaches (qualitative through fully quantitative) should be considered as part of the inspection planning process.<\/p>\n

PDF Catalog<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\nPDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nCONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nFOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nASME COMMITTEE ROSTER <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nCORRESPONDENCE WITH THE POST CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nASME PCC-3\u20132022 SUMMARY OF CHANGES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n1 SCOPE, INTRODUCTION, AND PURPOSE
1.1 Scope
1.2 Introduction
1.3 Purpose
1.4 Relationship to Regulatory and Jurisdictional Requirements
2 BASIC CONCEPTS
2.1 Risk <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n2.2 Overview of Risk Analysis
Figures
Figure 2.1-1 Risk Plot <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n2.3 Inspection Optimization
Figure 2.3-1 Management of Risk Using RBI <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n3 INTRODUCTION TO RISK-BASED INSPECTION
3.1 Items for Which RBI Will Not Compensate
3.2 Consequence and Probability for Risk-Based Inspection
Tables
Table 2.3-1 Factors Contributing to Loss of Containment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n3.3 Risk Analysis Methodology
Figure 3.3.1-1 Continuum of RBI Approaches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n3.4 Understanding How RBI Helps to Manage Operating Risks
3.5 Inspection Plan
Figure 3.3.4-1 Risk-Based Inspection Planning Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\n3.6 Management of Risks
3.7 Relationship Between RBI and Other Risk-Based and Safety Initiatives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\n3.8 Relationship With Jurisdictional Requirements
4 PLANNING THE RISK ANALYSIS
4.1 Getting Started
4.2 Outcome of the Planning Portion of the Process
4.3 Establish Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\n4.4 Initial Screening <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nFigure 4.4.1-1 Relationship Among Component, Equipment, System, Process Unit, and Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\n4.5 Selecting a Risk Analysis Approach
4.6 Estimating Resources and Time Required
5 DATA AND INFORMATION COLLECTION
5.1 Introduction
5.2 General
5.3 Data Needs and Common Types of Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\n5.4 Data Quality and Validation
6 DAMAGE MECHANISMS AND FAILURE MODES
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Identification of Damage Mechanisms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\n6.3 Damage Mechanisms
6.4 Failure Modes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\n6.5 Accumulated Damage
6.6 Tabulating Results
7 DETERMINING PROBABILITY OF FAILURE
7.1 Introduction to Probability Analysis
7.2 Determination of Probability of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\n7.3 Units of Measure for Probability of Failure Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\n7.4 Types of Probability Analysis
8 DETERMINING CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE
8.1 Introduction to Consequence Analysis
8.2 Other Functional Failures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\n8.3 Types of Consequences and Units of Measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nTable 8.3.5-1 Three-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories
Table 8.3.5-2 Six-Level Safety, Health, and Environmental Consequence Categories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\n8.4 Analysis of the Consequence of Failure
Table 8.3.7-1 Six-Level Table <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\n8.5 Determination of Consequence of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\n8.6 Volume of Fluid Released
8.7 Hazard Categories
Figure 8.5-1 Determination of Consequence of Failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\n9 RISK DETERMINATION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Determination of Risk <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\n9.3 Assumptions
9.4 Sensitivity Analysis
9.5 Risk Communication <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nFigure 9.2.1-1 Example of Calculating the Probability of a Specific Consequence <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nFigure 9.5.1-1 Example Risk Matrix Using Probability and Consequence Categories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\n9.6 Establishing Acceptable Risk Thresholds
9.7 Risk Management
10 RISK MANAGEMENT WITH INSPECTION ACTIVITIES
10.1 Managing Risk by Reducing Uncertainty Through Inspection
10.2 Identifying Opportunities for Risk Reduction From RBI and Probability of Failure Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\n10.3 Establishing an Inspection Strategy Based on Risk Analysis
10.4 Managing Risk With Inspection Activities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\n10.5 Managing Inspection Costs With RBI
10.6 Assessing Inspection Results and Determining Corrective Action
10.7 Achieving Lowest Life Cycle Costs With RBI <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\n11 OTHER RISK MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
11.1 General
11.2 Equipment Replacement and Repair
11.3 Fitness-for-Service Assessment
11.4 Equipment Modification, Redesign, and Rerating
11.5 Emergency Isolation
11.6 Emergency Depressurizing\/De-inventory
11.7 Modify Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\n11.8 Reduce Inventory
11.9 Water Spray\/Deluge
11.10 Water Curtain
11.11 Blast-Resistant Construction
11.12 Other Mitigation Activities
12 REANALYSIS
12.1 Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\n12.2 When to Conduct RBI Reanalysis
13 ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, TRAINING, AND QUALIFICATIONS
13.1 Interdisciplinary Approach
13.2 RBI Team Roles and Responsibilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\n13.3 Training and Qualifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\n14 DOCUMENTATION AND RECORD KEEPING
14.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51<\/td>\n15 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
15.1 Definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52<\/td>\n15.2 Acronyms
16 REFERENCES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53<\/td>\nTable 16-1 Reference Documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56<\/td>\nTable 16-2 Procurement Information <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
58<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDICES
NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A DAMAGE MECHANISM DEFINITIONS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
59<\/td>\nTable A-1 Damage Mechanism Definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
71<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX B DAMAGE MECHANISM AND DEFECTS SCREENING TABLE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
72<\/td>\nTable B-1 Damage Mechanism and Defects Screening Table <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
78<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX C TABLE OF EXAMINATION\/MONITORING METHODS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
79<\/td>\nTable C-1 Examination\/Monitoring Methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
82<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX D QUANTITATIVE METHODS INCLUDING EXPERT OPINION ELICITATION
D-1 INTRODUCTION
D-2 QUANTITATIVE PROBABILITY ANALYSIS
D-3 FAULT TREE\/EVENT TREE\/DECISION TREE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
83<\/td>\nD-4 MONTE CARLO SIMULATION METHOD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
84<\/td>\nFigure D-4.3-1 Process of Performing a Monte Carlo Simulation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
85<\/td>\nFigure D-5.1-1 Probability of Failure Rate vs. Time
D-5 LIFETIME RELIABILITY MODELS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
86<\/td>\nD-6 GENERIC FAILURE CURVES
D-7 EXPERT ELICITATION AND INTUITIVE OPINION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89<\/td>\nD-8 ASPECTS OF FULLY QUANTITATIVE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX E EXAMPLES OF RISK-BASED INSPECTION PROGRAM AUDIT QUESTIONS
E-1 INTRODUCTION
E-2 RBI PROGRAM REVIEW
E-3 INSPECTION PROGRAM TEAM STAFFING <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
91<\/td>\nNONMANDATORY APPENDIX F SUGGESTED PRACTICE FOR EVALUATION OF PRESSURE VESSELS FOR CONTINUED CYCLIC SERVICE
F-1 GENERAL
F-2 DATA AND RECORDS FOR OPERATION BEYOND CYCLIC DESIGN LIMITS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
92<\/td>\nF-3 EXAMINATION FREQUENCY AND DISPOSITION OF RESULTS
F-4 EXEMPTION FROM EXAMINATION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
93<\/td>\nF-5 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
F-6 VESSELS WITH LAYERED SHELLS
F-7 EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ASME PCC-3 – 2022 – Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Published By<\/td>\nPublication Date<\/td>\nNumber of Pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ASME<\/b><\/a><\/td>\n2022<\/td>\n95<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":419004,"template":"","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"product_cat":[2643],"product_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-418996","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-asme","8":"first","9":"instock","10":"sold-individually","11":"shipping-taxable","12":"purchasable","13":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/418996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/419004"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=418996"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=418996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}