This collection contains 133 papers presented at the 2009 ATC & SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Buildings and Other Structures, held in San Francisco, California, December 9-11, 2009.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 6<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | Plenary Papers National Seismic Hazard and Risk\u2014The Problem <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | Performance-Based Seismic Upgrade of Building Structural Systems: A 2020 Vision <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | Progress of Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings in the U.S. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 49<\/td>\n | Analysis and Rehabilitation Case Studies 1 Case Studies in Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of BART Parking Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 61<\/td>\n | Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Engineering Systems in Wellington Hospitals\u2014A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 73<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of a Three Story Pre-Northridge Steel Frame Essential Service Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 85<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation of an Existing Braced Frame Hospital Building by Direct Replacement with Buckling-Restrained Braces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 92<\/td>\n | Seismic Upgrade of a 15-Story Steel Moment Frame Building\u2014Satisfying Performance Criteria with Application of Experimental and Analytical Procedures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 102<\/td>\n | ASCE 41 Case Studies Evaluation of the ASCE 41 Linear Elastic Procedure for Seismic Retrofit of Existing Structures: Pros and Cons of the Method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 109<\/td>\n | Immediate Occupancy Seismic Upgrade of an Operating High-Tech Manufacturing Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 120<\/td>\n | Nonlinear Analysis of Pre-Northridge Steel High-Rise Building Using Modal-Pushover-Based Ground Motion Scaling Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 131<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation of Santa Monica Place Mall Based on ASCE 41 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 142<\/td>\n | Seismic Mitigation Program Case Studies Observations from California’s Unreinforced Masonry and Public School Programs and the California Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 154<\/td>\n | Risk Based Seismic Evaluation of Pre-1973 Hospital Buildings Using the HAZUS Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 170<\/td>\n | Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of Existing Department of Defense Structures in Accordance with the Unified Facilities Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 178<\/td>\n | The Policy Problem of Non-Ductile Concrete Buildings in Los Angeles: Costly Earthquakes, Uncertain Owners <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 190<\/td>\n | Analysis and Rehabilitation Case Studies 2 Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation and Cost-Benefit Studies Financial Benefit of Retrofitting Seismic-Risk Buildings with Passive Control Devices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 201<\/td>\n | Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 207<\/td>\n | Integrated Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation: A Practical Approach to Reducing Risk in Existing Vulnerable Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 218<\/td>\n | Preliminary Results of a Cost-Benefit Assessment of Replacing Seismically Vulnerable Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 229<\/td>\n | Roble Hall at Stanford University: A Case Study in the Evolution of Seismic Rehabilitation Standards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 241<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of School Buildings: An International Perspective High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Jacketing in a Seismic Retrofitting Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 251<\/td>\n | Performance-Based Retrofit of School Buildings in British Columbia, Canada <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 263<\/td>\n | Seismic Assessment on In Situ School Testing in Taiwan Using Methodology of ASCE\/SEI 41-06 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 275<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Reduction for Schools with Stone Slab Roof Systems in Delhi <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 285<\/td>\n | Earthquake Performance Assessment and Retrofit of Public Buildings in Istanbul: ISMEP Project Development of Guidelines and Effective Retrofit Strategies for Public Schools and Hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 298<\/td>\n | Displacement-Based Seismic Rehabilitation of Non-Ductile RC Frames with Added Shear Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 311<\/td>\n | Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Structures in Istanbul, Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 324<\/td>\n | Parametric Evaluation of Seismic Retrofitting Techniques Applied to the Public School Buildings in Istanbul <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 336<\/td>\n | Performance Comparisons of Seismic Assessment Methods with PSD Test Results of a Deficient RC Frame <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 348<\/td>\n | Analysis and Rehabilitation Case Studies 3 Practical Issues with Retrofit of Soft Story Residential Buildings Evaluation and Retrofit Provisions for Bay Area Soft Story Woodframe Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 360<\/td>\n | Manufactured, Pre-Engineered Moment Resisting Frames Used in Soft-Story Building Retrofits of Light-Framed Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 367<\/td>\n | Recommended Directions for IEBC Appendix Chapter A4: Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Wood-Frame Residential Buildings with Soft, Weak, or Open-Front Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 375<\/td>\n | Soft\/Weak Story Problems and Solutions for Residential Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 384<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance and Rehabilitation of Non-Building Structures Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Vincent Thomas Bridge under Spatially Variable Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 396<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance Evaluation of Container Cranes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 406<\/td>\n | The Excellent Seismic Performance of Steel Orthotropic Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 420<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation Using Performance-Based Objectives Fragility Curves for Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 432<\/td>\n | Performance Based Seismic Retrofit of the Los Angeles Downtown Women’s Center Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 444<\/td>\n | Seismic Assessment of Buildings, Considering Post-Earthquake Safety <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 459<\/td>\n | Suggested Improvements to Guidelines, Standards, and Analysis Procedures 1 Improving ASCE 31 and 41 An Action Plan for Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings: ATC 71 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 470<\/td>\n | Concept Paper on Utilizing the FEMA P695 (ATC-63) Ground Motion Spectral Shape Guidelines to Adjust the Target Displacement in the ASCE\/SEI 41 Nonlinear Static Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 482<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Coefficient Method for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings Built on Soft Soil Sites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 494<\/td>\n | Resilience Criteria for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings: A Proposal to Supplement ASCE 31 for Intermediate Performance Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 506<\/td>\n | Current Experimental and Analytical Research on Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns Experimental Study on Dynamic Behavior of Multi-Story Reinforced Concrete Frames with Non-Seismic Detailing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 517<\/td>\n | Local Deformation Measures for RC Column Shear Failures Leading to Collapse <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 529<\/td>\n | Progressive Collapse Simulation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Column Models with Strength Deterioration after Yielding <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 541<\/td>\n | Response Estimation of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Lateral Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 553<\/td>\n | Simultaneous Shear and Axial Failures of Reinforced Concrete Columns <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 564<\/td>\n | Development of Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Buildings Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Buildings: Vision <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 568<\/td>\n | Guide for Seismic Rehabilitation of Concrete Buildings: Summary of Future Changes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 577<\/td>\n | A Practical Model for Beam-Column Connection Behavior in Reinforced Concrete Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 589<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance Evaluation of Rehabilitated Reinforced Concrete Columns through Jacketing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 601<\/td>\n | Suggested Improvements to Guidelines, Standards, and Analysis Procedures 2 All About PMLs A Definition Undone: Explicit Estimation of PMLs in the Age of Reliance on Design Ground Motion Records <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 610<\/td>\n | Report Cards for Buildings: A Proposed Rating System for Earthquake Performance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 622<\/td>\n | The Problems with PMLs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 633<\/td>\n | Improving Acceleration Demands for Acceleration-Sensitive Nonstructural Components in Buildings A Comprehensive Study of Floor Acceleration Demands in Multi-Story Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 644<\/td>\n | Response Spectrum Method for Estimation of Peak Floor Acceleration Demand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 656<\/td>\n | Seismic Acceleration Demands on Nonstructural Components Attached to Elastic and Inelastic Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 668<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance of Nonstructural Components Nonstructural Seismic Performance for Facilities in Seismic Regions: Is the Expected Earthquake Performance Really Being Achieved? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 680<\/td>\n | Numerical Study to Investigate the Effect of Elastomeric Snubber Properties on Seismic Response of Vibration-Isolated Nonstructural Components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 691<\/td>\n | Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 703<\/td>\n | Seismic Vulnerability of Data Centers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 713<\/td>\n | Suggested Improvements to Guidelines, Standards, and Analysis Procedures 3 Analysis Methods for Seismic Rehabilitation and Evaluation A Simplified Nonlinear Analysis Procedure Using Linear Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 723<\/td>\n | Experimental and Numerical Validation of Selective Weakening Retrofit for Existing Non-Ductile R.C. Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 738<\/td>\n | FEMA P-440A: Effects of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on the Seismic Response of Structural Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 748<\/td>\n | Instrumental Assessment of the Predictive Capability of Nonlinear Static Analysis Procedures for Seismic Evaluation of Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 758<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofitting of Existing RC Frames with Buckling Restrained Braces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 770<\/td>\n | From Research to Practice: Transforming Analysis in the Design Office A Simplified Axial-Shear-Flexure Interaction Approach for Load and Displacement Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 782<\/td>\n | An Energy Spectrum Method for Seismic Evaluation of Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 794<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Concentrically Braced Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 806<\/td>\n | Simplified Analysis Methods for Low-Rise Buildings Displacement-Based Assessment Procedure for Regular Confined Masonry Buildings in Seismic Regions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 818<\/td>\n | Ductility-Related Force Modification Factors of Wood Constructions with Shear Walls of Different Ductility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 830<\/td>\n | Nonlinear Performance Based Seismic Assessment for Low-Rise Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 840<\/td>\n | Innovative Approaches to Rehabilitation 1 New Materials and Innovative Approaches for Seismic Rehabilitation Evaluation of a Sprayable, Ductile Cement-Based Composite for the Seismic Retrofit of Unreinforced Masonry Infills <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 852<\/td>\n | Experimental Investigation of Concrete Columns Wrapped with Shape Memory Alloy Spirals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 858<\/td>\n | Improving Seismic Performance Using Seismic Isolation and\/or Tuned Mass Dampers An Innovative Application of Base Isolation Technology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 872<\/td>\n | Analytical and Experimental Studies on Seismic Behavior of Buildings with Mid-Story Isolation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 884<\/td>\n | Seismic Isolation Retrofit for Existing Buildings in Japan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 896<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofit of a Landmark Structure Using a Mass Damper <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 909<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofitting of Three Important Buildings in Italy and Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 922<\/td>\n | Improving the Seismic Evaluation of Existing Structures through Monitoring Assessment of ASCE-7 Ground Motion Scaling Method Using Computer Model of Instrumented High-Rise Building <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 933<\/td>\n | Estimation of Seismic Performance of Existing Steel Moment Resisting Frame Buildings by Using Continuous Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 943<\/td>\n | Performance Comparisons of External Strengthening Methods for Deficient RC Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 954<\/td>\n | Improving Seismic Performance Using Viscous or Friction Dampers Identification and Modeling of Limit States of Viscous Dampers under Large Earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 966<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation of Extreme Soft-Story School Building with Friction Dampers Using the ASCE 41 Standard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 972<\/td>\n | Structural Optimization of Viscous Dampers Using Genetic Algorithms for Improving Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 984<\/td>\n | Viscous Dampers Used to Renovate Twin 17-Story State Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 996<\/td>\n | Improved Seismic Performance Using Other Types of Supplemental Damping\u2014I Arc Shaped Damper Retrofit Technique for Existing Rail Way Viaduct Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1005<\/td>\n | Comparison of Retrofitting Techniques for Existing Steel Moment Resisting Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1017<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofitting Using Energy Dissipation Fa\u00c3\u00a7ades <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1027<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofit Using Rocking Walls and Steel Dampers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1039<\/td>\n | Improved Seismic Performance Using Other Types of Supplemental Damping\u2014II Dynamic Response of Steel Moment-Frame Structures with Hybrid Passive Control Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1051<\/td>\n | Non-Structural Reinforced Concrete Partition Walls as Secondary Damping Devices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1063<\/td>\n | The Evaluation of a Damper Device with High Damping Rubber for Wooden Houses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1074<\/td>\n | Innovative Approaches to Rehabilitation 2 Case Study of Comprehensive Nonlinear Analysis and Laboratory Testing of RC Concrete Structure Benefits of Using Nonlinear Analysis on Seismic Retrofit from Structural Engineering Standpoint <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1085<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation\u2014Benefits of Component Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1094<\/td>\n | The Importance of Performance-Based Geotechnical Parameters for Nonlinear Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1103<\/td>\n | Infilled Non-Ductile Concrete Frames FRP Retrofit for Collapse Mitigation of RC Frames with URM Infills: 3-D Computational Modeling of an As-Built and Retrofitted One Story Building <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1110<\/td>\n | Infill Walls as a Spine to Enhance the Seismic Performance of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1122<\/td>\n | Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame with New CFRP Units Infilled Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1134<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance of Non-Ductile RC Frames with Brick Infill <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1146<\/td>\n | Mitigation Policy Issues, Strategies, and Ongoing Programs 1 Addressing the Global Earthquake Risks Posed by Existing Buildings Istanbul Seismic Risk Mitigation and Emergency Preparedness Project (ISMEP) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1158<\/td>\n | Building Capacity in Delhi to Seismically Retrofit Existing Important Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1170<\/td>\n | Earthquakes and Existing Buildings: New Zealand Experience 1968 to 2008 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1180<\/td>\n | Policy Issues with Soft Story Residential Buildings Mitigating San Francisco’s Soft-Story Building Problem <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1192<\/td>\n | Problem to Policy: Linking Hazard and Residential Building Data to Policy Decisions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1197<\/td>\n | Emerging Seismic Mitigation Programs for Hazardous Wood-Frame Structures ATC-50, Seismic Grading and Retrofitting Project for Detached Single-Family Wood-Frame Dwellings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1208<\/td>\n | Loss Estimates for Large Soft-Story Woodframe Buildings in San Francisco <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1221<\/td>\n | Strengthening of Existing Light-Framed Buildings with Gypsum Shear Walls Using a Newly Developed Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Assembly <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1230<\/td>\n | Use of Garage Doors to Resist Lateral Forces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1241<\/td>\n | Mitigation Policy Issues, Strategies, and Ongoing Programs 2 Concrete Coalition: Finding and Fixing Dangerous Buildings The Concrete Coalition: A Panel Discussion on Understanding the Policy, Inventory, and Technical Problems Associated with Pre-1980 Concrete Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1252<\/td>\n | Overcoming Technical Impediments to Risk Awareness A ShakeCast User’s Observations on the Benefits of Situational Awareness for Seismic Risk Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1258<\/td>\n | Applications and Challenges to Using HAZUS-MH for Building Seismic Risk Awareness <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1264<\/td>\n | End-to-End Seismic Risk Management Software <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1275<\/td>\n | Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for Quetta and Surrounding Region <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1286<\/td>\n | Earthquake Surface Fault Rupture Design Considerations Designing Buildings to Accommodate Earthquake Surface Fault Rupture <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1298<\/td>\n | Evaluation and Retrofit for Fault Rupture: UC Berkeley, Bowles Hall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1312<\/td>\n | UC Berkeley’s California Memorial Stadium: Seismic Strengthening of an Historic Structure Residing over an Active Fault <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1322<\/td>\n | Mitigation Policy Issues, Strategies, and Ongoing Programs 3 Improving the Seismic Performance of Historic Buildings: An International Perspective Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Historical Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Buildings in Istanbul <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1334<\/td>\n | The Improving of the Seismic Performance of Existing Old Public Unreinforced Masonry Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1346<\/td>\n | Traditional and Innovative Techniques for the Seismic Strengthening of Barrel Vaulted Structures Subjected to Rocking of the Abutments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1358<\/td>\n | Posters Poster Session 1 Cyclic Model for High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composite Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1370<\/td>\n | Development of Seismic Vulnerability Curves for Masonry Buildings Using the Applied Element Method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1378<\/td>\n | Distribution of Inelastic Demand in Slender R\/C Shear Walls Subjected to Eastern North America Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1391<\/td>\n | Importance of Wood and Iron Tension Members on Seismic Performance of Historic Masonry Buildings: Three Case Studies from Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1401<\/td>\n | Seismic Enhancement of Existing Buildings by Means of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Diaphragms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1413<\/td>\n | Seismic Resistance of Fire-Damaged Reinforced Concrete Columns <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1425<\/td>\n | Poster Session 2 Static Pushover Analysis Based on an Energy-Equivalent SDOF System: Application to Spatial Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1434<\/td>\n | Steel Bar Fracture of Reinforced Concrete Frame under Extremely Strong Seismic Load <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1446<\/td>\n | Structural Pounding Response Mitigation by Liquid Dampers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1457<\/td>\n | Studying the Rehabilitation of Existing Structures Using Compound System of Cables and Shape Memory Alloys <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1466<\/td>\n | Poster Session 3 Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints with CFRP Composites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures<\/b><\/p>\n |