GSP 181 contains 234 papers covering topics in soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering that were presented at Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, held in Sacramento, California, May 18-22, 2008.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 10<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | Ground Motions Keynote\u2014Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis: Code Usage Protocols and Verification against Vertical Array Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 48<\/td>\n | Assessment of Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) Methods for Non-Linear Dynamic Analyses of Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 58<\/td>\n | Identification of Near-Fault Velocity Pulses and Prediction of Resulting Response Spectra <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 68<\/td>\n | Preliminary Estimation of Seismically Induced Ground Strains from Spatially Variable Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 78<\/td>\n | Probabilistic Use of Arias Intensity in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 88<\/td>\n | Seismic Design Criteria Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 98<\/td>\n | Seismic Hazard Analysis and Probabilistic Ground Motions in the Upper Mississippi Embayment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 108<\/td>\n | Site Response A Simplified Constitutive Model to Simultaneously Match Modulus Reduction and Damping Soil Curves for Nonlinear Site Response Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 118<\/td>\n | Basin Effects in the Upper Mississippi Embayment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 128<\/td>\n | Comparing Weak- and Strong-Motion Spectral Ratios at the Turkey Flat Site Effects Test Area, Parkfield, California: Possible Nonlinear Soil Behavior <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 138<\/td>\n | Consequences of Solution Non-Uniqueness in Surface Wave Tests for Seismic Response Studies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 148<\/td>\n | Developing Site-Specific Design Response Spectra for a Type F Site Due to Liquefaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 158<\/td>\n | Dynamic Response of Unsaturated Non-Collapsible and Collapsible Deposits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 168<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Site Response for Deepwater Field <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 178<\/td>\n | Hysteretic Damping Correction and Its Effect on Non-Linear Site Response Analyses <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 188<\/td>\n | Influence of Rate Dependent Soil Behavior on Propagated Ground Motion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 198<\/td>\n | Modeling Nonlinear Site Response Uncertainty in the Los Angeles Basin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 208<\/td>\n | Nonlinear Shear Wave Propagation in Strain Stiffening and Strain Softening Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 218<\/td>\n | Parametric Analysis of the Seismic Response of Irregular Topographic Features <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 228<\/td>\n | Seismic Response of the San Francisco International Airport Airfield during the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 238<\/td>\n | Site Response Analysis for Tito Scalo Area (PZ) in the Basilicata Region, Italy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 250<\/td>\n | Site Response to Vertical Earthquake Motion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 258<\/td>\n | Spatial Analysis of Damage Distribution in the 2001 Southern Peru Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 268<\/td>\n | Strain-Dependent Soil Properties Estimated from Downhole Array Recordings at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant during the 2007 Niigata-Ken Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 278<\/td>\n | The Turkey Flat Blind Prediction Experiment for the September 28, 2004 Parkfield Earthquake: Comparison with Other Turkey Flat Recordings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 288<\/td>\n | The Turkey Flat Blind Prediction Experiment for the September 28, 2004 Parkfield Earthquake: General Overview and Models Tested <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 298<\/td>\n | Two Dimensional Evaluation of Site Effect in Rectangular Valleys <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 310<\/td>\n | Mapping and Faulting Theme Paper\u2014Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Mapping <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 342<\/td>\n | A Deformation-Based Approach for Mapping Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Hazard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 352<\/td>\n | A New Site Classification System Based on Strong Motion Analysis in Iran <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 364<\/td>\n | An Evaluation of Site Classification for National Strong-Motion Recording Stations in Turkey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 374<\/td>\n | Earthquake Loss Estimation Tool for Urban Areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 386<\/td>\n | Geological and Microtremor Survey, Damage Distribution, and Reconstruction of Muzaffarabad and Surroundings after the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 396<\/td>\n | Incorporating the Effects of Site Geology in CEUS Hazard Maps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 406<\/td>\n | Seismic Microzonation of Shiraz City, Southwest of Iran <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 416<\/td>\n | The Effect of Shallow Foundation Position on Their Interaction with Reverse Faults <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 426<\/td>\n | Dynamic Properties of Soils Cyclic Shear Tests of Municipal Waste in Large Triaxial Device for Identification of Its Dynamic Properties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 436<\/td>\n | Density Effects on the Aging Behavior of Sands and the Anisotropy of Aging-Induced Stiffness Increases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 446<\/td>\n | Development of a P-Wave Measurement System for Laboratory Specimens <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 456<\/td>\n | Development of Buried Sensors for Stiffness Measurements of Soft Clays Using Bender Elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 466<\/td>\n | Development of Methods to Predict the Dynamic Behavior of Fine Coal Refuse: Preliminary Results from Two Sites in Appalachia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 476<\/td>\n | Dynamic Performance of Toyoura Sand Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Carpet Waste Strips <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 490<\/td>\n | Dynamic Properties of Coal Waste Refuse in a Tailings Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 504<\/td>\n | Dynamic Properties of Saturated Compacted Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 514<\/td>\n | Dynamic Response of Unsaturated Soils Using Resonant Column and Bender Element Testing Techniques <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 522<\/td>\n | Effective Soil Density for Small Strain Shear Wave Propagation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 532<\/td>\n | Effects of Cyclic Rotation of Principal Stress Axes and Intermediate Principal Stress Parameter on the Deformation Behavior of Sands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 542<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Dynamic Properties of a Calcite Cemented Gravely Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 552<\/td>\n | Pore Fluid Induced Damping of Saturated Soil in Resonant Column Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 562<\/td>\n | Sand Aging Field Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 574<\/td>\n | Stress Integration Approach for Soil Damping Measurements in Torsional Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 584<\/td>\n | Water, Inertial Damping, and the Complex Shear Modulus <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 594<\/td>\n | Dynamic Properties of Naturally-Cemented Silts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 602<\/td>\n | Geophysical Measurement Techniques A Comparison of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles from SASW, MASW, and ReMi Techniques <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 612<\/td>\n | Deep Shear Wave Velocity Profiling of Poorly Characterized Soils Using the NEES Low-Frequency Vibrator <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 622<\/td>\n | Development and Applications of In-Hole Seismic Method to Measure Shear Wave Velocity of Subsurface Materials <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 632<\/td>\n | Use of Shear Wave Velocity to Estimate Settlement Potential in Mine Spoils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 642<\/td>\n | Inversion Algorithm to Evaluate Velocity Profiles from Downhole Seismic Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 652<\/td>\n | Liquefaction General Characterizing the Liquefaction Resistance of Aged Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 662<\/td>\n | Comparison of Recently Developed Liquefaction Analysis Methods at Two Fluvial Sand Sites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 672<\/td>\n | Cyclic Response of a Sand with Thixotropic Pore Fluid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 682<\/td>\n | Effect of High Confining Stresses on Static and Cyclic Strengths of Mine Tailing Materials <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 692<\/td>\n | Effects of Mica Content on Cyclic Resistance of Poorly-Graded Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 700<\/td>\n | Effects of Stress Reduction Factors on Liquefaction Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 710<\/td>\n | Influence of Aging on Liquefaction Potential: Preliminary Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 720<\/td>\n | Investigating the Critical State Using Laboratory Ring Shear Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 730<\/td>\n | Liquefaction Resistance Recovered From “On-the-Fly” CPTu-Measured Pore Pressures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 740<\/td>\n | Numerical and Physical Modeling of Liquefaction Mechanisms in Layered Sands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 752<\/td>\n | Observations on Sand Boils from Simple Model Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 762<\/td>\n | Pore Structure Variation of Porous Media under Vibrations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 768<\/td>\n | The Effect of the Hammer Energy Efficiency Ratio on SPT-Based Liquefaction Evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 778<\/td>\n | The Rigidity Recovery of Post Liquefied Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 788<\/td>\n | The Seismic Dilatometer Marchetti Test (SDMT) for Evaluating Liquefaction Potential under Cyclic Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 804<\/td>\n | Using Decision-Tree Learning to Assess Liquefaction Potential from CPT and V[sub(s)] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 814<\/td>\n | Effects on Structures and Foundations An Experimental Study of the Effect of Seepage Force on Liquefaction of Soil in Embankments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 828<\/td>\n | Assessment of Structure-Induced Liquefaction Triggering <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 838<\/td>\n | Centrifuge Experimentation of Building Performance on Liquefied Ground <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 848<\/td>\n | Components of Dynamic Subgrade Reaction on Pile in Saturated Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 858<\/td>\n | Effect of Soil Liquefaction on Flexural Behavior of Axially and Laterally Loaded Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 868<\/td>\n | FD Solutions for Static and Dynamic Winkler Models with Lateral Spread Induced Earth Pressures on Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 878<\/td>\n | Mechanism of Pile Group Settlement in Liquefiable Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 888<\/td>\n | Performance-Based Seismic Response of Pile Foundations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 900<\/td>\n | Plastic Hinge Formation in Pile Foundations Due to Liquefaction-Induced Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 910<\/td>\n | The Role of Soil Compressibility in Centrifuge Model Tests of Piles Foundation Undergoing Lateral Spreading of Liquefied Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 920<\/td>\n | Liquefaction of Silty Soils Cyclic Failure of Fine-Grained Soils during the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 930<\/td>\n | Cyclic Shear Response of Undisturbed and Reconstituted Low-Plastic Fraser River Silt <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 940<\/td>\n | Effect of Fines on Sand Residual Strength after Liquefaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 952<\/td>\n | Effect of Sand Gradation and Fines Type on Liquefaction Behaviour of Sand-Fines Mixture <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 964<\/td>\n | Effects of Fines on Undrained Behaviour of Sands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 976<\/td>\n | Effects of Permeability on Liquefaction Resistance and Cone Resistance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 988<\/td>\n | Liquefaction Behavior of Mississippi River Silts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 998<\/td>\n | Liquefaction Resistance of Sands Containing Varying Amounts of Fines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1008<\/td>\n | Post-Liquefaction Shear Behavior of Bonneville Silty-Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1018<\/td>\n | Probabilistic Assessment of Cyclic Soil Straining in Fine-Grained Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1028<\/td>\n | Shaking Table Test on a Large Specimen of Mailiao Silty Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1038<\/td>\n | Ground Improvement Keynote\u2014Recent Developments in Ground Improvement for Mitigation of Seismic Risk to Existing Embankment Dams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1058<\/td>\n | Application of Deep Dynamic Compaction to U.S. Route 44 Relocation Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1068<\/td>\n | Centrifuge Testing of Prefabricated Vertical Drains for Liquefaction Remediation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1078<\/td>\n | Colloidal Silica Gel and Sand Mixture Dynamic Properties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1088<\/td>\n | Compaction Grouting to Mitigate Liquefaction for a New Medical Retail Building <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1098<\/td>\n | Cone Penetration Resistance Variation with Time after Blast Liquefaction Testing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1108<\/td>\n | Cone Penetration Testing before, during, and after Blast-Induced Liquefaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1118<\/td>\n | Dynamic Response of an Embankment during Stone-Column Piling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1128<\/td>\n | Evaluation of a Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Mat to Mitigate Post-Liquefaction Settlements A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1138<\/td>\n | First Applications of the SAVE Compozer Method (Non-Vibratory Stone Columns) for Soil Densification in the U.S. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1148<\/td>\n | Imaging a Grouted Column in a Centrifuge Model Using Shear Wave Velocity Tomography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1158<\/td>\n | Increase in Cyclic Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soil Due to Installation of Drilled Displacement Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1168<\/td>\n | Liquefaction Potential Mitigation Using Rapid Impact Compaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1178<\/td>\n | Monitoring for Successful Site Improvement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1188<\/td>\n | Numerical Modeling of the Seismic Response of Columnar Reinforced Ground <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1200<\/td>\n | Relations between Penetration Resistance and Cyclic Strength to Liquefaction as Affected by K[sub(C)]-Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1212<\/td>\n | Seismic Response Evaluation of an Onshore Building Site Improved by Deep Mixed Foundation System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1222<\/td>\n | Shear Stress Redistribution as a Mechanism to Mitigate the Risk of Liquefaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1232<\/td>\n | Study on Uplift Behaviour of Plate Anchor in Geogrid Reinforced Sand Bed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1242<\/td>\n | Uplift Testing of Rammed Aggregate Pier Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1256<\/td>\n | Numerical Modeling DEM Simulation of the Seismic Response of Shallow Foundation on Liquefiable Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1266<\/td>\n | Efficient Numerical Modeling of Liquefaction-Induced Deformations of Soil Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1276<\/td>\n | Numerical Simulation of Seismic Ground Motion Isolation Using Fully Coupled Nonlinear Response in Saturated Sands <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1284<\/td>\n | Transient Boundary Integral Equation of Dynamic Unsaturated Poroelastic Media <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1296<\/td>\n | Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) General Determination of Soil-Structure Interaction Effects for a Model Test Structure Using Parametric System Identification Procedures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1306<\/td>\n | Dimensional Analysis of Soil-Foundation-Structure System Subjected to Near Fault Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1316<\/td>\n | Dimensional Response Analysis of Inelastic Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1326<\/td>\n | Dynamic Effects of Impact Machine Foundations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1344<\/td>\n | Physical and Numerical Modeling of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1356<\/td>\n | Response Sensitivity Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1368<\/td>\n | Seasonally Frozen Soil Effects on the Nonlinear Behavior of a Parking Garage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1378<\/td>\n | Sliding Blocks under Near-Fault Pulses: Closed-Form Solutions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1388<\/td>\n | SSI and Shallow Foundations Advanced 3-D Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Cellular-Raft Foundation in Soft Clay <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1398<\/td>\n | Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction for SDOF Structures on Footings and Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1408<\/td>\n | Effect of Critical Contact Area Ratio on Moment Capacity of Rocking Shallow Footings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1420<\/td>\n | Material Model Parameters for Shallow Foundation Numerical Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1430<\/td>\n | Numerical Simulation of a Soil Model-Model Container-Centrifuge Shaking Table System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1440<\/td>\n | Numerical Simulation of Displacement Functions of Strip Footings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1451<\/td>\n | Wave Propagation under Vertically Excited Surface Foundation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1461<\/td>\n | SSI and Pile Foundations Analysis of Statnamic Behavior of Full-Scale Pile Group in Soft Clays and Silts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1471<\/td>\n | Cyclic P-Y Curves for a Pile in Cohesive Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1481<\/td>\n | E-Defense Facility: A Frontier in Geotechnical Physical Modeling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1491<\/td>\n | Nonlinear Behavior of Single Piles Vibrating Vertically <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1501<\/td>\n | Non-Linear Dynamic Response of Deepwater Suction Pile Foundation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1511<\/td>\n | Piles under Earthquake Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1525<\/td>\n | Response of Clay-Pile System under Earthquake Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1535<\/td>\n | Static and Dynamic Lateral Load Tests on a Pile Cap with Partial Gravel Backfill <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1545<\/td>\n | Undrained Tip Response of Drilled Shaft in Cohesionless Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1551<\/td>\n | SSI and Retaining Structures Analysis of the Seismic Behaviour of Propped Retaining Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1561<\/td>\n | Distribution of Seismic Earth Pressures on Gravity Walls by Wave-Based Stress Limit Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1571<\/td>\n | Dynamic Centrifuge Study of Seismically Induced Lateral Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1583<\/td>\n | Excitation and Flexibility Effects on Dynamic Response of Cantilever Retaining Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1595<\/td>\n | Extended Veletsos-Younan Model for Geofoam Compressible Inclusions behind Rigid, Non-Yielding Earth-Retaining Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1605<\/td>\n | Lateral Seismic Soil Pressures on Soldier Pile Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1615<\/td>\n | Permanent Seismic Deformation of MSE Walls with Uneven Reinforcement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1625<\/td>\n | Seismic Earth Pressures behind Retaining Walls: Effects of Rigid-Body Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1637<\/td>\n | Seismic Lateral Earth Pressure Reduction on Earth-Retaining Structures Using Geofoams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1647<\/td>\n | Seismic Modeling of a 135-Foot-Tall MSE Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1657<\/td>\n | The Effect of Amplification on the Seismic Stability of Reinforced Soil Slopes Using Horizontal Slice Method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1667<\/td>\n | Bridges Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Pinning Effects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1679<\/td>\n | Closed-Form Force-Displacement Backbone Curves for Bridge Abutment-Backfill Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1689<\/td>\n | Development of Innovative Foundation Systems to Optimize Seismic Behavior of Bridge Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1699<\/td>\n | Factors that Affect the Performance of Bridge Foundations Undergoing Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1709<\/td>\n | Proposed Changes to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications for the Seismic Design of Retaining Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1719<\/td>\n | Seismic Soil-Foundation Investigation of the Brooklyn Bridge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1749<\/td>\n | Seismic Response of a Typical Highway Bridge in Liquefiable Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1761<\/td>\n | Sensitivity Study of an Older-Vintage Bridge Subjected to Lateral Spreading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1771<\/td>\n | Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Bridge Columns Supported on CISS Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1782<\/td>\n | Geoscience and Geotechnical Aspects of Recent Earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1792<\/td>\n | Effect of Backfill Soil Type on Stiffness and Ultimate Capacity of Bridge Abutments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1802<\/td>\n | Seismic Behavior of 2D Topographic Features Subjected to Vertically Propagating Incident SV at High Frequencies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1814<\/td>\n | Dams and Levees Characterizing the Earthquake Ground Shaking Hazard in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1826<\/td>\n | Damage Assessment and Seismic Modeling of Dams in Connection with the 2006 Hawaii Earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1836<\/td>\n | Deformation Analysis for Seismic Retrofit of an Embankment Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1846<\/td>\n | Dynamic Behavior for Lightweight Spillway with Geosynthetics on Small Earth Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1856<\/td>\n | Earthquake-Induced Deformations of Partially Saturated Embankments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1866<\/td>\n | Effect of Heterogeneous Soil Strength on the Seismic Residual Displacement of Embankments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1876<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Investigations and Site Characterization of the Success Dam Seismic Remediation Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1886<\/td>\n | Motion Characteristics of Compacted Earth Dams under Small Earthquake Excitations in Taiwan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1898<\/td>\n | Nonlinear Dynamic SSI Analyses of a Concrete Water Reservoir <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1912<\/td>\n | Seismic Characterization and Its Limited Implication for San Pablo Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1922<\/td>\n | Seismic Deformation Analyses of the New Coquitlam Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1932<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitations of Miyun Reservoir <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1940<\/td>\n | Seismic Vulnerability of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Levees <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1950<\/td>\n | Using ShakeMap and ShakeCast to Prioritize Post-Earthquake Dam Inspections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1960<\/td>\n | Walnut Canyon Dam Seismic Performance Evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1970<\/td>\n | Wavelet Signal Processing Technique in Analyzing Earthquake Records of Masjed Soleyman Embankment Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1980<\/td>\n | Embankments and Slopes Centrifuge Modeling of Earthquake-Induced Failure Process of Soil Slopes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1990<\/td>\n | Constructing Hillside Ozone Facilities in a High Seismic Zone <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2002<\/td>\n | Displacement-Based Seismic Stability Analyses of Reinforced and Unreinforced Slopes Using Planar Failure Surfaces <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2012<\/td>\n | Energy-Based Evaluation of Earthquake-Induced Slope Failure and Its Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2022<\/td>\n | Failure Mechanisms of Landfills under Dynamic Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2032<\/td>\n | Validation of Generic Municipal Solid Waste Material Properties for Seismic Design of Landfills <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2042<\/td>\n | Pipelines Assessing Geotechnical Hazards for Water Pipes with Uniform Confidence Level <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2052<\/td>\n | Characteristics of Uplifting Velocity of a Buried Pipe in Liquefied Ground <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2062<\/td>\n | Shake-Table Testing and FLAC Modeling of Liquefaction-Induced Slope Failure and Damage to Buried Pipelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2072<\/td>\n | Soil-Pipeline Interaction Behavior under Strike-Slip Faulting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2082<\/td>\n | Ports Theme Paper\u2014Seismic Performance and Design of Port Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2098<\/td>\n | Comparison of Panama Wharf Performance Using Numerical Analysis and Limit Equilibrium Methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2108<\/td>\n | Full-Scale Lateral Pile Load Test in Rock Fill <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2118<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Considerations and Soil-Structure Interaction: Proposed ASCE Standards for Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2128<\/td>\n | Integrating Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses of Pile-Supported Wharfs in Seismic Risk Management of Port Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2138<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofit and Improvement of Alpha-Bravo Wharves in Guam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2148<\/td>\n | Tunnels and Other Underground Structures Keynote\u2014Centrifuge Testing of the Seismic Performance of a Submerged Cut-and-Cover Tunnel in Liquefiable Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2178<\/td>\n | Theme Paper\u2014Earthquake Engineering for Tunnels and Large Underground Structures: A Case History <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2212<\/td>\n | Cut-and-Cover Structures: Seismic Response and Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2228<\/td>\n | Damage of New Sanyi Railway Tunnel during the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2238<\/td>\n | Seismic Analyses for the Fourth Bore of Caldecott Tunnel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2248<\/td>\n | Seismic Analyses of the Bay Tunnel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2260<\/td>\n | Seismic Response Analyses for the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2270<\/td>\n | Development and Verification of a Pseudo-Static Solution for Evaluation of Seismic-Induced Deformations of Rectangular Tunnels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2284<\/td>\n | Other Topics in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Keynote\u2014Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering: Opportunities and Implications for Geotechnical Engineering Practice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2316<\/td>\n | Full-Scale Laboratory Tests Using a Shape-Acceleration Array System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2326<\/td>\n | Recent Improvements in MOC for Earthquake Response <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 2336<\/td>\n | Some Characteristics of Ground Vibration as Induced by High-Speed Trains <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV<\/b><\/p>\n |