This collection contains 142 papers presented at the 12th Triennial International Conference, held in Jacksonville, Florida, April 25-28, 2010.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 7<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | Engineering Analysis: Coastal and Extreme Breakwaters Cruise Vessel Wind Coefficients for Mooring Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | Physical Model Tests of Bowthruster Impacts to Armored Slopes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 39<\/td>\n | Widening and Deepening the Main Navigational Channel of the Lower St. Johns River (Northeasten Florida): Simulation of the Pre- and Post-Condition Hydrodynamics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 49<\/td>\n | PIANC Maritime Navigation Commission Working Group 56: Application of Geotextiles in Waterfront Protection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 59<\/td>\n | Harbors Port of Anchorage Tidal Hydraulics Physical Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 69<\/td>\n | Design of Port@Lekki <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 79<\/td>\n | Seismic Analysis and Design of Berth 14 Extension: Balboa, Panama <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 89<\/td>\n | Seismic Seismic Retrofit of Piers Supported on Battered Piles Using Lead-Rubber Bearings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 99<\/td>\n | Analysis of Seawall Concepts Using Yielding Soil Anchors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 109<\/td>\n | Experimental Study of the Seismic Response of Container Cranes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 118<\/td>\n | Structural-Geotechnical Procedures for New Wharf Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 128<\/td>\n | Waves Quay Wall Influence on Passing-Ship Induced Mooring Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 139<\/td>\n | Benchmark Tests for Harbor Wave Agitation Models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 149<\/td>\n | Design of Hurricane Wave Forces for Overwater Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 159<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Wave Reflection Coefficient from Dynamically Stable Reshaping Berm Breakwaters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 170<\/td>\n | Engineering Analysis: Other Dredge Materials A (Geotechnical) Tale of Two Land Reclamations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 180<\/td>\n | Design and Construction for Optimization of a Dredge Spoil Area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 191<\/td>\n | Port of Anacortes Former Scott Paper Mill Clean-Up: Innovative Solution and Challenges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 201<\/td>\n | Masonville Marine Terminal: Port Development, Dredged Material Management, Environmental Restoration, and Mitigation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 211<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Steel Sheet Pile Wall Wale Rehabilitation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 221<\/td>\n | Seismic Design Methods for Anchored Sheet Pile Bulkheads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 231<\/td>\n | Deep Foundation for Difficult Site Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 240<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Site Assessment for Port of Long Beach, Pier G Container Terminal Redevelopment Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 250<\/td>\n | Container Terminal Development on Soft-Ground Sites: Geotechnical Considerations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 260<\/td>\n | Vibroreplacement of Sand within a Closed-Cell Cofferdam Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 270<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Challenges Associated with the Design of a New Marine Oil Terminal at the Port of Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 280<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Aspects of the Port of Long Beach Pier E Redevelopment Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 290<\/td>\n | Navigation Works Integrated Navigation Effects\/Impacts Modeling System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 301<\/td>\n | Port of Ehoala\u2014Design of Navigation Works <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 311<\/td>\n | Modeling Passing Vessels and Moorings in Port Design and Operation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 321<\/td>\n | Navigation of Inland Waterways at Bridge Crossings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 331<\/td>\n | What Lies Beneath Integrated Site Investigation for Craney Island Eastward Expansion, Portsmouth, Virginia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 341<\/td>\n | Ex Situ Loss Rates from ACZA Treated and Wrapped Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 348<\/td>\n | Subsurface Investigation of Uniform Wharf at Naval Base Guam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 357<\/td>\n | Pile Repair and Cathodic Protection of Chem Marine Pier <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 365<\/td>\n | Engineering Analysis: Structural Durability Duluth-Superior Harbor Freshwater Corrosion Update <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 375<\/td>\n | The Euromax Quay Wall: A Durable Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 383<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation of Navy Pier: Facility Modernization and Extension of Service Life, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego, California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 394<\/td>\n | Numerical Modeling to Achieve Concrete Durability for New Waterfront Structures of 100 Years or More, but at What Price? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 404<\/td>\n | Military Gulf Marine Fabricators Graving Dock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 414<\/td>\n | Electric Boat Graving Docks 1 and 2 Construction Challenges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 424<\/td>\n | Development of Wind and Current Coefficients for Multiple U.S. Navy Vessel Analysis Using OPTIMOOR <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 432<\/td>\n | Berths 145-147 Container Terminal Wharf Upgrade Design and Construction at the Port of Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 442<\/td>\n | Piers and Wharves Reconstruction Work on Lyttelton Port of Christchurch, New Zealand, Marine Oil and Gas Terminal Utilising an Innovative Cable Stayed Fender System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 452<\/td>\n | Submarine Cables Cause Dock Wall Failure at the Port of Milw aukee <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 460<\/td>\n | Piers 6 and 31 Replacement\u2014Evolution of Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 470<\/td>\n | Implementation of New Regulations for Marine Oil Terminals in California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 478<\/td>\n | Seismic Proposed Seismic Detailing Criteria for Piers and Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 488<\/td>\n | Seismic Design of Marine Caisson Waterfront Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 498<\/td>\n | Seismic Fragility of Jumbo Port Container Cranes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 508<\/td>\n | Wharf Structure Design Consideration of Pier E Redevelopment Project at the Port of Long Beach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 518<\/td>\n | Environmental Protection Habitat and Wildlife Economic Solutions for New Vessel Construction at Shipyard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 527<\/td>\n | City of San Clemente Coastal Trail <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 538<\/td>\n | Salt Pond SF2 Restoration, Wildlife, and Habitat Protection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 548<\/td>\n | Winter Flounder Habitat Utilization and Environmental Windows in New York and New Jersey Harbor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 558<\/td>\n | Innovative Port Programs Emulating Nature by Building an Island Style Breakwater for the Fort Pierce Marina <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 567<\/td>\n | LID Concepts for Container Terminals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 577<\/td>\n | Project Development of Jacksonville Shipyards Redevelopment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 590<\/td>\n | Planning and Financial Considerations for Small Craft Harbors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 602<\/td>\n | Other\/Coping with Contaminants Design of Marine Habitat Mitigation Structure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 611<\/td>\n | Modeling of Oxygen Injection Experiment in Savannah Harbor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 621<\/td>\n | In Situ Capping of Contaminated Sediments with Organophilic Clay <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 629<\/td>\n | Remediation of an Active Oilfield in a Port Environment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 639<\/td>\n | Navigation and Waterways Beneficial Reuse Innovative Reuse of Drydocks as Contained Disposal Sites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 649<\/td>\n | Jacksonville Harbor Crosscurrents: Planning Options to Provide a Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Opportunity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 660<\/td>\n | New Port Construction Leads to Salt Water Wetland Creation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 670<\/td>\n | Dredged Material Management Planning for the Intracoastal and Okeechobee Waterways in Florida <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 677<\/td>\n | Modeling and Simulation Mooring Loads Due to Perpendicular Passing Ships <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 687<\/td>\n | Modeling Moored Ship Response to a Passing Ship <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 697<\/td>\n | Passing Ship Effects at Typical Waterfronts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 707<\/td>\n | Comparison of CADET Vertical Ship Motions with DGPS in Ambrose Channel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 717<\/td>\n | Sediment Management Two-Dimensional Modeling of Sediment Transport and Bed Morphology to Identify Shoaling Reduction Alternatives near Matanzas Inlet in St. Johns County, Florida <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 727<\/td>\n | Minimising Harbour Siltation: The Economic and Environmental Future of Ports <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 737<\/td>\n | Jetty Modification Study for Kalaeloa Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 747<\/td>\n | Why Deepen U.S. Harbors?\u2014A Recession and the Panama Canal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 756<\/td>\n | Widening and Deepening Tightrope in Houma: Balancing Competing Needs for a Deepened Channel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 766<\/td>\n | Jacksonville Harbor: Costs of the 40-Foot Deepening <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 776<\/td>\n | Numerical Modeling and Field Study for the Jacksonville Harbor Deepening Project: A Comprehensive Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 788<\/td>\n | Geophysics and Dredging in the Giant New York Harbor Deepening Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 797<\/td>\n | Port Infrastructure Automation and New Technology Vision from Inland Navigation Technology \u201809 Workshop <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 807<\/td>\n | Expanded Use of Automatic Identification System (AIS) Navigation Technology in Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 815<\/td>\n | Process and Equipment Automation for Container Terminals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 825<\/td>\n | Extreme Loading of Wharf Crane Girders <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 834<\/td>\n | Foundations Pile Installation below a Settlement-Sensitive Bridge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 844<\/td>\n | Construction of a Deep-Sea Wharf in the Canadian Arctic <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 854<\/td>\n | Evaluation and Design for Wharf Berth Improvements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 864<\/td>\n | Rehabilitation of the Orient Point Lighthouse Foundation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 874<\/td>\n | Novel Approaches Nested RMGs for Intermodal Rail Handling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 879<\/td>\n | Hybrid Design\/Build Approach for Quaywall 729 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 889<\/td>\n | Installation of RMG Cranes at Intermodal Rail Yard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 899<\/td>\n | Container Crane Recycling: Upgrade and Relocation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 909<\/td>\n | Pavement The Challenge of Designing a Port Terminal on a Compressible Spring, Craney Island Eastward Expansion, Portsmouth, Virginia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 919<\/td>\n | RCC Pavement Success at Mobile Container Terminal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 930<\/td>\n | Design of Container Yard at Port of Balboa <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 940<\/td>\n | Long-Term Thinking Yields Innovative Wharf Topping <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 950<\/td>\n | Power and Corrosion Microbial Induced Corrosion in Ports and Harbors Worldwide <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 958<\/td>\n | Relative Material Loss\u2014A Methodology for Approximating Material Loss on Structural Plating Separating Dissimilar Marine Environments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 968<\/td>\n | Challenges Associated with Implementing Operations for the First Cold Ironing of Oil Tanker Vessels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 978<\/td>\n | Site Specific Challenges for Cold Ironing Upgrades <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 988<\/td>\n | Port Planning and Operations Facility Maintenance and Management Enhancing South Africa\u2019s Port Maintenance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 997<\/td>\n | Service Life Extension Program for Dry Docks 10 and 11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1007<\/td>\n | Geophysical-Geological Mapping of Infrastructure in New York Harbor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1017<\/td>\n | Practical Repair of Timber Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1027<\/td>\n | Master Planning Limiting LNG: Public Perception Hinders the Role of Liquefied Natural Gas Domestically <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1036<\/td>\n | Updated Port Wave\/Flood Load Building Code Provisions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1045<\/td>\n | Strategic Risk Management\/Mitigation Plan for the San Francisco Bay and River Delta Region <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1055<\/td>\n | Safe Harbor: Berth Expansion to Support New Bedford\u2019s Growing Commercial Fishing Fleet <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1066<\/td>\n | Master Planning and Inland Links Port of Ehoala\u2014Planning of a Multi-Use Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1076<\/td>\n | Development of the SP-SSA International Terminal, Vietnam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1086<\/td>\n | Implementation of the San Pedro Bay Ports Rail Enhancement Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1096<\/td>\n | New York City Harbor: A New Face for a National Landmark <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1106<\/td>\n | Project Development Development Technique Integration of Container Terminal Design and Construction with Operations to Reduce the Project Delivery Cost and Shorten the Schedule <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1116<\/td>\n | Rapid Pier Delivery Using Precast Concrete Components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1126<\/td>\n | Blair-Hylebos Peninsula Terminal Redevelopment: Road\/Rail\/Infrastructure Improvements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1136<\/td>\n | Construction Management of a Marine Terminal Expansion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1146<\/td>\n | Finance and Information Design, Build, Finance, and Operate the Greenfield Port of Bata <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1155<\/td>\n | Infrastructure Cargo Fees\u2014A Way Forward <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1163<\/td>\n | Port of Tacoma Engineering Estimate Validations on Large Projects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1171<\/td>\n | Terminal Planning and Design: Container Foreign Container Facilities at L\u00c3\u00a1zaro C\u00c3\u00a1rdenas, Mexico <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1181<\/td>\n | Apron Wharf Structure for Fairview Container Terminal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1191<\/td>\n | Manzanillo Container Terminal Redevelopment: Maximizing Throughput in a Limited Space <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1201<\/td>\n | Planning and Design of the Port of Balboa Phase 4 Expansion, Balboa, Panama <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1210<\/td>\n | U.S. Development of New Container Terminal in Jacksonville <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1220<\/td>\n | Long Beach\u2019s Middle Harbor\u2014First Modern Terminal Proposed under New Environmental Rules <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1230<\/td>\n | Design of Pier S Marine Terminal per the Green Port Policy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1240<\/td>\n | Operational Buildings: Dames Point Terminal, Jaxport <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1250<\/td>\n | Automated Planning for a New Berth in New York Harbor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1261<\/td>\n | A Better Move\u2014Automated Container Terminals in North America <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1272<\/td>\n | Master Planning of a Semi-Automated Container Terminal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1283<\/td>\n | Modern Greenfield Terminal Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1293<\/td>\n | Terminal Planning and Design: Other Energy and RO\/RO Tools for Faster Turn-Around Times in RoRo Terminals: Case Studies from Europe; Karlshamn-Klaipeda Short Sea Shipping Link <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1304<\/td>\n | Modernizing a 90 Year Old Petroleum Shipping Terminal to Meet Current Operation Standards and Regulations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1314<\/td>\n | Comparative Study of Thermal Coal Import Facilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1324<\/td>\n | The Marine Oil Terminal Engineering and Maintenance Program at the Port of Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1335<\/td>\n | Military and Cruise Rehabilitation of Drydock No. 2, Portsmouth Navy Shipyard: Innovative Solutions for a 108 Year Old Drydock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1344<\/td>\n | Case Study of a Navy Magnetic Silencing Facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1354<\/td>\n | Design and Construction of Cruise Berth for Colon 2000, Panama <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1362<\/td>\n | Development and Qualification of a Floating Pier for the U.S. Navy Fleet <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1372<\/td>\n | Small Craft and Recreation Creating a Green Marina in Panama Bay <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1382<\/td>\n | Fishermen\u2019s Terminal Renovation at Port of Seattle <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1392<\/td>\n | Replacement of Three Ferry Berths at Northern Terminals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1402<\/td>\n | Treatment Pond to 350-Slip Marina\u2014Planning and Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1412<\/td>\n | Author Index A <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1413<\/td>\n | B <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1415<\/td>\n | C <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1416<\/td>\n | D <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1417<\/td>\n | E <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1418<\/td>\n | F <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1419<\/td>\n | G <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1420<\/td>\n | H <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1421<\/td>\n | I <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1422<\/td>\n | J K <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1424<\/td>\n | L <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1425<\/td>\n | M <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1427<\/td>\n | N <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1428<\/td>\n | O P <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1429<\/td>\n | R <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1430<\/td>\n | S <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1433<\/td>\n | T <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1434<\/td>\n | U V W <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1435<\/td>\n | Y Z <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ports 2010<\/b><\/p>\n |