BS EN IEC 61788-25:2018
$142.49
Superconductivity – Mechanical properties measurement. Room temperature tensile test on REBCO wires
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2018 | 32 |
IEC 61788-25:2018 specifies the test method and procedures for testing tensile mechanical properties of REBCO superconductive composite tapes at room temperature. This test is used to measure the modulus of elasticity and 0,2 % proof strength. The values for elastic limit, fracture strength and percentage elongation after fracture serve only as a reference. This document applies to samples having a rectangular cross-section with an area of 0,12 mm 2 to 6,0 mm 2 (corresponding to the tapes with width of 2,0 mm to 12,0 mm and thickness of 0,06 mm to 0,5 mm)
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
5 | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
6 | English CONTENTS |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | INTRODUCTION |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
13 | Figures Figure 1 – Typical stress–strain curve and definition of moduli of elasticityand 0,2 % proof strengths |
14 | 4 Principle 5 Apparatus 5.1 General 5.2 Testing machine 5.3 Extensometer 6 Specimen preparation 6.1 General 6.2 Length of specimen |
15 | 6.3 Determination of cross-sectional area (So) 7 Testing conditions 7.1 Specimen gripping 7.2 Setting of extensometer 7.3 Testing speed 7.4 Test 8 Calculation of results 8.1 Modulus of elasticity (E) |
16 | 8.2 0,2 % proof strength (Rp0,2-0 and Rp0,2-U) 9 Uncertainty of measurement |
17 | 10 Test report 10.1 Specimen 10.2 Results |
18 | Annex A (informative)Additional information relating to Clauses 1 to 10 A.1 General A.2 Extensometer A.2.1 Double extensometer Figure A.1 – Low-mass Siam twin type extensometer |
19 | Figure A.2 – Low-mass double extensometer |
20 | A.2.2 Single extensometer A.3 Elastic limit Figure A.3 – An example of the extensometer provided with balance weightand vertical specimen axis |
21 | A.4 Gripping force A.5 Percentage elongation after fracture (Af) A.6 Condition of straining to fracture A.7 Relative standard uncertainty (RSU) Tables Table A.1 – Relative standard uncertainty (XRSU) and coefficient of variance (X)for experimental data of E0 and EU |
22 | Table A.2 – Relative standard uncertainty and coefficient of variancefor experimental data of Rp0,2-0 and Rp0,2-U |
23 | A.8 Discretion applying this document A.9 Assessment on the reliability of the test equipment A.10 Additional information for test report A.10.1 General A.10.2 Test result A.10.3 Test conditions Table A.3 – Value of X for the data of the modulus of elasticity andthe 0,2 % proof strength tested according to this document |
24 | Annex B (informative)Evaluation of combined standard uncertaintyfor the modulus of elasticity B.1 Model equation |
25 | B.2 Estimation of standard uncertainty B.2.1 Precondition B.2.2 Stress measurement |
26 | B.2.3 Size measurement |
27 | B.2.4 Strain measurement |
28 | B.2.5 Uncertainties on measurement of gauge length Table B.1 – Uncertainties for experimental variables in Formula (B.6) |
29 | B.3 Significant experimental factor B.3.1 Initial strain rate [Osamura et al., 2014] Figure B.1 – Strain rate dependence of the relative standard uncertaintygiven by Formula (B.6) Table B.2 – Summary of standard uncertainty evaluation, where the initial strain rateand the thickness were used as 3 x 10−4 /s and 0,1 mm, respectively |
30 | B.3.2 Thickness measurement [Osamura et al., 2014] Figure B.2 – Relative standard uncertainty for the thickness measurementas a function of tape thickness |
31 | Bibliography |