This part of IEC 62343, which is a technical report, explains an investigation of operating mechanical shock and a vibration test for dynamic modules. It also describes the results of a survey, evaluation and mechanical simulation of mechanical shock and vibration testing. This report covers a study of standardization for operating mechanical shock and vibration test methods.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 6<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 8<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Background 3 Questionnaire results in Japan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | 4 Evaluation plan 5 Evaluation results 5.1 Step 1 Figures \n Figure 1 \u2013 Photos of evaluating hammer impact, rack and boards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 10<\/td>\n | Figure 2 \u2013 Evaluation results of hammer impact H Tables \n Table 1 \u2013 Rack and board specifications, conditions of evaluating hammer impact and acquiring data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 5.2 Step 2 Figure 3 \u2013 Photos of evaluating adjacent board insertion and rack handle impact <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 DUT (VOA and WSS) installed on boardsand rack for second step of the evaluation Figure 5 \u2013 Oscilloscope display of waveform changes in vibration and optical output Table 2 \u2013 Dynamic modules used in evaluation and evaluation conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 13<\/td>\n | 5.3 Step 3 Figure 6 \u2013 Evaluation results when employing MEMS-VOA for Z axis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 14<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2013 Photos of the MEMS-VOA shock\/vibration test equipment Table 3 \u2013 Conditions for MEMS-VOA vibration\/shock evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | Figure 8 \u2013 Operational shock characteristics of MEMS-VOA Figure 9 \u2013 Vibration evaluation results for MEMS-VOA (Z axis; 2 G) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | Figure 10 \u2013 Shock and vibration evaluation system for WSS and tunable laser Table 4 \u2013 Results of MEMS-VOA vibration evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2013 Shock evaluation results for WSS (directional dependence) Figure 12 \u2013 Shock evaluation results for WSS (z-axis direction and shock dependence) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | 6 Simulation 6.1 Simulation model Figure 13 \u2013 Simulation model Table 5 \u2013 Conditions for simulating board shock and vibration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | 6.2 Frequency characteristics 6.3 Dependence on board design Figure 14 \u2013 Vibration simulation results (Conditions: 1,6 mm x 240 mm x 220 mm, t x H x \n D) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | 6.4 Consistency of evaluation and simulation results Figure 15 \u2013 Vibration simulation results (Dependence on board conditions) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | 7 Summary 8 Conclusions Table 6 \u2013 Comparison of hammer impact shock evaluation results and vibration simulation (Conditions: 1,6 mm x 240 mm x 220 mm, t x H x \n D) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dynamic modules – Investigation of operating mechanical shock and vibration tests for dynamic modules<\/b><\/p>\n |