{"id":78770,"date":"2024-10-17T18:25:21","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T18:25:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asce-9780784409404-2007\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T19:38:04","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T19:38:04","slug":"asce-9780784409404-2007","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asce\/asce-9780784409404-2007\/","title":{"rendered":"ASCE 9780784409404 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
GSP 175 contains 105 papers presented at the Seventh International Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, held in Boston, Massachusetts, September 24-27, 2007.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Theme Lectures Statistical Methods for Monitoring Data Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | Successes and Failures of Instrumentation Programs in Major Construction Projects in Singapore <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | Use of Monitoring Data to Update Performance Predictions of Supported Excavations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Why Monitor Performance? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
119<\/td>\n | Case Studies Bridges and Foundations Lateral Load Tests on Bored Piles and Pile Groups in Sand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
130<\/td>\n | Unknown Foundation Testing: A Case Comparison of Different Geophysical Methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
141<\/td>\n | The Cost-Effectiveness of Dynamic Pile Installation Monitoring: A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
153<\/td>\n | Mechanics of Micropile Performance from Instrumented Load Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
167<\/td>\n | Field Measurements of Passive Pressures behind an Integral Abutment Bridge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
179<\/td>\n | Vibration due to Driving Concrete Piles Using Open-Ended Diesel Hammer in Central and South Florida <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
191<\/td>\n | A Case Study of Construction-Related Ground Movements in Providence Silt <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
199<\/td>\n | Tunnels and Shafts Instrumentation during APM Construction at Dulles International Airport <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
208<\/td>\n | Amsterdam Noord\/Zuidlijn: Use of Background Monitoring Data Prior to Construction Commencement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
220<\/td>\n | Deformation Monitoring of the Underground Metro Station Rotterdam CS: A Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
232<\/td>\n | Performance Monitoring of Deep Shafts at Changi WRP Project, Singapore <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
244<\/td>\n | Monitoring Earth Pressure Balance Tunnels in Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
256<\/td>\n | Buildings Response of Historic Structure to Long-Term Environmental and Construction Vibration Effects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | The Use of Excavation and Ground Performance Data to Estimate the Compressibility of a Glacial Till <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
281<\/td>\n | Elevators as a Repeatable Excitation Source for Structural Health Monitoring in Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
293<\/td>\n | Walls and Excavation Support Deflection and Earth Pressure Measurements of an Anchored Concrete Shoring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
302<\/td>\n | Daily and Seasonal Response of a Cantilever Retaining Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
312<\/td>\n | Field Instrumentation for an Innovative Design-Build Excavation Adjacent to Heritage Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
323<\/td>\n | Jet Grouting Induced Changes in Soldier Pile Loads and Pile Deflections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
335<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned in Use of Instrumented Soldier Pile Wall for Inverse Analysis of Material Properties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
347<\/td>\n | Performance Monitoring of Deep Excavation at Changi WRP Project, Singapore <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
359<\/td>\n | Instrumentation and Performance of the Third Runway North MSE Wall at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
373<\/td>\n | A Case Study on Trench Collapse of Deep Diaphragm Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
385<\/td>\n | Continuous Monitoring of Deep Excavation Pits for Damage Prevention <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
397<\/td>\n | Real Time Monitoring at the Olive 8 Excavation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
409<\/td>\n | In-Situ Testing and Energy Procedural Effects on SPT Results at a Fluvial Sand Site <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
419<\/td>\n | Design and Implementation of an Instrumentation Program to Minimize Risk of Damage to a High-Voltage Electrical Ductbank <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
431<\/td>\n | Measured Load Transfer Rates Applied to Electricity Transmission Towers Footing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
441<\/td>\n | Specialized Instrumentation for Hydromechanical Measurements in Deep Argillaceous Rock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
453<\/td>\n | Automation of the Monitoring System at the Itaipu Hydroelectric Power Plant <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
465<\/td>\n | CPT Measurements near Drilled Displacement Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
477<\/td>\n | An Electronic Nose-Membrane Interface Probe for Sniffing Subsurface Contaminants <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
489<\/td>\n | BOTDR for Detection of Chemical and Liquid Content <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
501<\/td>\n | Earthworks and Ground Improvement Unstable Slope Monitoring with a Wireless Shape-Acceleration Array System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
513<\/td>\n | Observational Approach Used for Slope Stability during Surcharging of Municipal Solid Waste and Soft Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
526<\/td>\n | Settlement Monitoring for Bioreactor Landfill Airspace Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
538<\/td>\n | Performance Evaluation of Instrumented LNG Retention Dikes on Louisiana Soft Clays <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
550<\/td>\n | Role of Instrumentation in Assessment of Complex Ground Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
562<\/td>\n | Staged Embankment Construction Using In-Situ Instrumentation Returns: Benefits to Contractor and Cost Saving to the Owner <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
572<\/td>\n | Benefits and Pitfalls of Multistage Embankment Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
584<\/td>\n | Safety Monitoring of the Yellow River Dike: A Feasibility Study on Various Instrumentation Schemes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
596<\/td>\n | Case Study: Optimization and Monitoring of Slope Design in Highly Weathered Shale <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
608<\/td>\n | Measured Settlements of Two Selected High Embankments Founded on Soft Soil <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
620<\/td>\n | Instrumentation and Monitoring for a Riverbank Slope Stabilization Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
632<\/td>\n | Settlement Behavior of the Deep Marine Sedimentary Ground Improved by SCPs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
644<\/td>\n | Solvay Waste Compression Evaluation Using Field Instrumentation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
656<\/td>\n | Rock Cut Slope Instrumentation within Variable and Potentially Unstable Sedimentary Strata <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
668<\/td>\n | Towards European Standards in Performance Monitoring of Geotechnical Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
680<\/td>\n | Locks and Dams Earth Pressure Cells: Environmental Effects and Calibration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
692<\/td>\n | Plumb Line System for Double Arch Dams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
700<\/td>\n | Monitoring of Slope Deformation and Groundwater during Construction of the Lauenburg Lock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
709<\/td>\n | Use of Instrumentation to Safeguard Stability of a Tailings Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
722<\/td>\n | Performance of Foundation Ground of a Large Dam during First Filling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
730<\/td>\n | Structural and Geotechnical Instrumentation of the Pichi Pic\u00c3\u00ban Leuf\u00c3\u00ba Hydroelectric Dam, Argentina: A 54-m (177 ft) Compacted Gravel Embankment Dam with an Upstream Concrete Slab and Cutoff Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
744<\/td>\n | Miscellaneous Design and Deployment of an Integrated Instrumentation System in a Monitoring Well at the Penn West CO[sub(2)]-EOR Pilot, Alberta, Canada <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
758<\/td>\n | Water Leakage Detection Using Optical Fiber at the Peribonka Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
770<\/td>\n | Automated Monitoring System used to Support Drydock Operations at Electric Boat <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
781<\/td>\n | State of the Art and Future Trends Geophysical Instrumentation for Vibro Stone Column Soil Improvement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
793<\/td>\n | Borehole GPR to Detect and Map Deviated H-Pile Foundations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
804<\/td>\n | Local Identification of Soil and Soil-Structure Systems Using Shape-Acceleration Arrays <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
814<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Case Studies: A Rapid Technique to Determine Allowable Bearing Pressure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
822<\/td>\n | The Use of the Fully-Grouted Method for Piezometer Installation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
842<\/td>\n | Capabilities of the NEES@UCLA Mobile Dynamic Structural Testing Laboratory <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
851<\/td>\n | Installation and Instrumented Load Testing of Deep Soil Mixing Columns <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
865<\/td>\n | Handy Permeability Test Method with a Single-Unit Apparatus Developed at the Solid Waste Landfill Construction Site <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
877<\/td>\n | Characteristics of Ground Vibrations in STSP Deduced from Falling Weight Tests <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
889<\/td>\n | Instrumentation for a Gas Path through Host Rock and Along Sealing Experiment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
901<\/td>\n | Displacement Measurements Ahead of a Tunnel Face Using the RH Extensometer <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
909<\/td>\n | TRIVEC and Sliding Micrometer: Fully Digital Instruments for Geotechnical Displacement and Deformation Measurement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
921<\/td>\n | Coupled Pressuremeter-Phicometer Analysis for Soil Exploration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
931<\/td>\n | Pitfalls\/Problems Factors Influencing the Performance of Strain Guages: A Singapore Perspective <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
943<\/td>\n | Laboratory and In Situ Tests on an Automatic Monitoring System with IPIs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
955<\/td>\n | Problems and Solutions Using Electrolytic Tiltmeters: Case Study New Natomas and South River Pump Stations, Sacramento, CA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
967<\/td>\n | Accuracy and Longevity of Open Channel Liquid Level Systems and Gages <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
977<\/td>\n | Real Time Monitoring Vibratory Roller Integrated Measurement of Earthwork Compaction: An Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
989<\/td>\n | TDR\/Fiber Optic Sensors Distributed Optical Fiber Strain Sensing in a Secant Piled Wall <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1001<\/td>\n | Some Innovative Developments of TDR Technology for Geotechnical Monitoring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1013<\/td>\n | Geotechnical Alarm Systems Based on TDR Technology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1025<\/td>\n | Monitoring Tunnel Deformation Induced by Close-Proximity Bored Tunneling Using Distributed Optical Fiber Strain Measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1038<\/td>\n | Algorithm for Time Domain Reflectometry Bridge Scour Measurement System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1048<\/td>\n | TDR Technologies for Soil Identification and Properties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1059<\/td>\n | Data Acquisition Systems Design, Setup, and Evaluation of a Data Acquisition Array for an Instrumented Test Pile Cluster <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1075<\/td>\n | Internet-Enabled Geotechnical Data Exchange <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1084<\/td>\n | The UC Davis High-Speed Wireless Data Acquisition System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1096<\/td>\n | Remote Monitoring\/Wireless Multi-Hop Wireless Crack Measurement for Control of Construction Vibrations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1107<\/td>\n | 3DeMoN ROBOVEC\u2014Integration of a New Measuring Instrument in an Existing Generic Remote Monitoring Platform <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1119<\/td>\n | Laser-Based System for Non-Destructive Inspection of Concrete Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1130<\/td>\n | A Wireless Remote Monitoring System: Application in the Northeast Corridor Railtrack <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1140<\/td>\n | Wireless Sensor Network for Monitoring of Geo-Structural Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1150<\/td>\n | Case Studies in Integrated Autonomous Remote Monitoring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1161<\/td>\n | Data Analysis\/Software Soil Behavior and Excavation Instrumentation Layout <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1173<\/td>\n | TRIVEC Measurements in the Inverse Analysis of the Long-Term Stability of a Constrained Landslide <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1185<\/td>\n | Integrated Construction Management System Based on GIS for Soft Ground Improvement by Preloading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1197<\/td>\n | Pore Pressure and Total Stress around Excavations in a Deep Clay Formation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1209<\/td>\n | Statistical Analysis: A Tool for Understanding Monitoring Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1221<\/td>\n | Methods for Automatic Storage, Visualization, and Reporting in Datalogging Applications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1235<\/td>\n | Automated Total Stations Long-Term Use of Automated Total Station to Monitor Movement of High-Rise Buildings in New York City <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1244<\/td>\n | Applications and Limitations of Automated Motorized Total Stations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1256<\/td>\n | Observations of Ground Movement during Pipe Ramming Operations under a Railway Embankment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1268<\/td>\n | Precision Surveying Monitoring of Shoring and Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1280<\/td>\n | Structural The Sacrifice of Certainty and Confidence: The Basic Geometry of Tilt Monitoring Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1293<\/td>\n | The Business Side of Instrumentation Benefits Promoting the Business of the FMGM Community <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1305<\/td>\n | Instrumentation and Monitoring Trends in New York City and Beyond <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1317<\/td>\n | Settlement Profiling Instrumentation System to Assess Waste Compressibility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1329<\/td>\n | Author Index <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 7th FMGM 2007<\/b><\/p>\n |