BS EN 61784-2:2010
$215.11
Industrial communication networks. Profiles – Additional fieldbus profiles for real-time networks based on ISO/IEC 8802-3
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2010 | 242 |
This part of IEC 61784 specifies
-
performance indicators supporting classification schemes for Real-Time Ethernet (RTE) requirements;
-
profiles and related network components based on ISO/IEC 8802-3, IEC 61158 series, and IEC 61784-1;
-
RTE solutions that are able to run in parallel with ISO/IEC 8802-3-based applications.
These communication profiles are called Real-Time Ethernet communication profiles.
NOTE The RTE communication profiles use ISO/IEC 8802-3 communication networks and its related network components or IEC 61588 and may in some cases amend those standards to obtain RTE features.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
13 | CONTENTS |
24 | INTRODUCTION |
25 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
30 | 3 Terms, definitions, abbreviated terms, acronyms, and conventions 3.1 Terms and definitions |
33 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms and acronyms |
36 | 3.3 Symbols |
45 | 3.4 Conventions Tables Table 1 – Layout of profile (sub)clause selection tables Table 2 – Contents of (sub)clause selection tables |
46 | Table 3 – Layout of service selection tables Table 4 – Contents of service selection tables Table 5 – Layout of parameter selection tables Table 6 – Contents of parameter selection tables |
47 | 4 Conformance to communication profiles Table 7 – Layout of class attribute selection tables Table 8 – Contents of class attribute selection tables |
48 | 5 RTE performance indicators 5.1 Basic principles of performance indicators |
49 | 5.2 Application requirements 5.3 Performance indicators Figures Figure 1 – Example of graphical representation of consistent indicators |
50 | Table 9 – Basic network topology types |
51 | 6 Conformance tests 6.1 Concept Figure 2 – Conformance test overview |
52 | 6.2 Methodology 6.3 Test conditions and test cases 6.4 Test procedure and measuring |
53 | 6.5 Test report 7 Communication Profile Family 2 (CIP™ ) – RTE communication profiles 7.1 General overview |
54 | 7.2 Profile 2/2 Table 10 – CP 2/2: performance indicator overview |
55 | Table 11 – CP 2/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
58 | 7.3 Profile 2/2.1 Table 12 – CP 2/2: consistent set of performance indicators for factory automation Table 13 – CP 2/2.1: DLL protocol selection |
59 | Table 14 – CP 2/2.1: DLL protocol selection of management objects Table 15 – CP 2/2.1: AL service selection |
60 | Table 16 – CP 2/2.1: AL protocol selection |
61 | Table 17 – CP 2/2.1: performance indicator overview |
62 | Table 18 – CP 2/2.1: performance indicator dependency matrix Table 19 – CP 2/2.1: Consistent set of performance indicators for motion control |
63 | 8 Communication Profile Family 3 (PROFIBUS & PROFINET ) – RTE communication profiles 8.1 General overview Table 20 – Administrative numbers assignment |
64 | Table 21 – IP layer parameters for IO controller Table 22 – IP layer parameters for IO device |
65 | Table 23 – Timeout values for name resolution Table 24 – Reaction time for an IO device |
66 | Table 25 – Timeout values for PTCP Table 26 – Maximum time values for PTCP |
67 | Table 27 – Communication classes applicable in conformance classes Table 28 – Redundancy class applicable in conformance classes |
68 | Table 29 – Index (user specific) Table 30 – Index (subslot specific) |
70 | Table 31 – Index (slot specific) |
71 | Table 32 – Index (AR specific) |
72 | Table 33 – Index (API specific) |
73 | Table 34 – Index (device specific) Table 35 – Communication feature list |
74 | Table 36 – Conformance class behaviors |
76 | Table 37 – Conformance class behaviors for network components |
77 | 8.2 Profile 3/4 Figure 3 – Example of network topology using CP 3/4, CP 3/5, and CP 3/6 components |
78 | Table 38 – CP 3/4: AL service selection for an IO device |
80 | Figure 4 – Example of network topology with wireless segment |
81 | Table 39 – CP 3/4: AL protocol selection for an IO device and Network component |
82 | Table 40 – CP 3/4: AL protocol selection for an IO controller |
84 | Table 41 – CP 3/4, CP 3/5 and CP 3/6: performance indicator overview Table 42 – CP 3/4, CP 3/5 and CP 3/6: performance indicator dependency matrix |
86 | Figure 5 – Calculation basis for delivery time and throughput RTE |
87 | Table 43 – Manager parameters |
88 | Table 44 – Client parameters |
89 | Table 45 – CP 3/4: Consistent set of PI for MinDeviceInterval = 128 ms |
90 | 8.3 Profile 3/5 Table 46 – CP 3/4: Assumed values for consistent set of PI calculation |
91 | Table 47 – CP 3/5: AL service selection for an IO device |
93 | Table 48 – CP 3/5: AL protocol selection for an IO device and Network component |
94 | Table 49 – CP 3/5: AL protocol selection for an IO controller |
96 | Table 50 – CP 3/5: Consistent set of PI for MinDeviceInterval = 128 ms |
97 | 8.4 Profile 3/6 Table 51 – CP 3/5: Assumed values for consistent set of PI calculation |
98 | Table 52 – CP 3/6: AL service selection for an IO device |
99 | Table 53 – Buffering capacity |
100 | Table 54 – CP 3/6: AL protocol selection for an IO device and network component |
101 | Table 55 – CP 3/6: AL protocol selection for an IO controller |
103 | Table 56 – CP 3/6: Consistent set of PI for MinDeviceInterval=1ms with 64 end-stations |
104 | 9 Communication Profile Family 4 (P-NET) – RTE communication profiles 9.1 General overview Table 57 – CP 3/6: Assumed values for consistent set of PI calculation |
105 | 9.2 Profile 4/3, P-NET on IP Table 58 – CP 4/3: DLL service selection |
106 | Table 59 – CP 4/3: DLL protocol selection Table 60 – CP 4/3: AL service selection Table 61 – CP 4/3: AL protocol selection |
107 | Table 62 – CP 4/3: Performance indicator overview Table 63 – CP 4/3: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
110 | 10 Communication Profile Family 6 (INTERBUS® ) – RTE communication profiles 10.1 General overview Table 64 – CP 4/3: Consistent set of performance indicators Table 65 – Parameters for calculation of consistent set of performance indicators |
111 | Figure 6 – Linking device communication profiles RTE-network context Table 66 – CPF 6: device CP identifier assignment |
112 | 10.2 Profile 6/4 Figure 7 – Linking device mapping principle Figure 8 – Data Mapping |
114 | 10.3 Profile 6/5 Table 67 – Linking device Type 10 network performance indicator overview |
116 | 10.4 Profile 6/6 |
117 | 11 Communication Profile Family 10 (Vnet/IP ) – RTE communication profiles 11.1 General overview Table 68 – OSI layers and CPF 10 layers |
118 | 11.2 Profile 10/1 Table 69 – Overview of CPF 10 profile |
119 | Table 70 – CP 10/1: DLL service selection Table 71 – CP 10/1: DLL protocol selection |
120 | Table 72 – Transport Layer Parameter selection |
121 | Table 73 – CP 10/1: AL service selection Table 74 – CP 10/1: AL protocol selection Table 75 – CP 10/1: Performance indicator overview |
122 | Table 76 – CP 10/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
125 | Table 77 – CP 10/1: Consistent set of performance indicators for the communication between two end-stations belonging to the same domain Table 78 – CP 10/1: Consistent set of performance indicators for the communication between two end-stations belonging to different domains |
126 | 12 Communication Profile Family 11 (TCnet ) – RTE communication profiles 12.1 General overview Table 79 – CP 10/1: Consistent set of performance indicators for the communication between two end-stations belonging to the same domain with one lost flame Table 80 – CP 10/1: Consistent set of performance indicators for the communication between two end-stations belonging to different domains with one lost flame |
127 | 12.2 Profile 11/1 Table 81 – CPF 11: Overview of profile sets Table 82 – CP 11/1: DLL service selection |
128 | Table 83 – CP 11/1: DLL protocol selection Table 84 – CP 11/1: DLL protocol selection of Clause 5 |
129 | Table 85 – CP 11/1: DLL protocol selection of Clause 6 |
130 | Table 86 – CP 11/1: AL service selection Table 87 – CP 11/1: AL protocol selection Table 88 – CP 11/1: Performance indicator overview |
131 | Table 89 – CP 11/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix Table 90 – CP 11/1: TCC data service selection |
133 | Figure 9 – Throughput RTE and non-RTE bandwidth |
135 | 12.3 Profile 11/2 Table 91 – CP 11/1: Consistent set of PIs preferential for RTE communications Table 92 – CP 11/1: Consistent set of PIs both for RTE and non-RTE communications |
136 | Table 93 – CP 11/2: DLL protocol selection Table 94 – CP 11/2: DLL protocol selection of Clause 5 |
137 | Table 95 – CP 11/2: DLL protocol selection of Clause 6 |
138 | Table 96 – CP 11/2: Performance indicator overview Table 97 – CP 11/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
139 | Table 98 – CP 11/2: TCC data service selection |
140 | Figure 10 – CP 11/2: Throughput RTE and non-RTE bandwidth |
142 | Table 99 – CP 11/2: Consistent set of PIs preferential for RTE communications Table 100 – CP 11/2: Consistent set of PIs both for RTE and non-RTE communications |
143 | 13 Communication Profile Family 12 (EtherCAT) – RTE communication profiles 13.1 General overview 13.2 Profile CP 12/1 Table 101 – CP 12/1: PhL selection of preferred physical layer |
144 | Table 102 – CP 12/1: PhL selection of an optimized physical layer Table 103 – CP 12/1: DLL service selection |
145 | Table 104 – CP 12/1: DLL protocol selection |
146 | Table 105 – CP 12/1: DLL service selection Table 106 – CP 12/1: DLL protocol selection |
147 | Table 107 – CP 12/1: AL service selection Table 108 – CP 12/1: AL protocol selection |
148 | Table 109 – CP 12/1: AL service selection Table 110 – CP 12/1: AL protocol selection |
149 | Table 111 – CP 12/1: Performance indicator overview Table 112 – CP 12/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
150 | Table 113 – CP 12/1: Performance indicator ranges |
151 | 13.3 Profile CP 12/2 Table 114 – CP 12/1: Consistent set of performance indicators for mid size automation systems |
152 | Table 115 – CP 12/2: DLL service selection Table 116 – CP 12/2: DLL protocol selection |
153 | Table 117 – CP 12/2: DLL service selection Table 118 – CP 12/2: DLL protocol selection |
154 | Table 119 – CP 12/2: AL service selection |
155 | Table 120 – CP 12/2: AL protocol selection Table 121 – CP 12/2: AL service selection |
156 | Table 122 – CP 12/2: AL protocol selection Table 123 – CP 12/2: Performance indicator overview |
157 | Table 124 – CP 12/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
158 | 14 Communication Profile Family 13 (ETHERNET Powerlink ) – RTE communication profiles 14.1 General overview 14.2 Profile 13/1 Table 125 – CP 12/2: Consistent set of performance indicators Table 126 – CPF 13: Overview of profile sets |
159 | Table 127 – CP 13/1: DLL service selection Table 128 – CP 13/1: DLL protocol selection Table 129 – CP 13/1: AL service selection Table 130 – CP 13/1: AL protocol selection |
160 | Table 131 – CP 13/1: Performance indicator overview Table 132 – CP 13/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
163 | Table 133 – CP 13/1: Consistent set of PIs small size automation system |
164 | 15 Communication Profile Family 14 (EPA )- RTE communication profiles 15.1 General overview Table 134 – CP 13/1: Consistent set of PIs medium size automation system Table 135 – CP 13/1: Consistent set of PIs large size automation system |
165 | 15.2 CPF 14 (EPA) communication concept |
166 | Figure 11 – EPA system network topology example |
167 | 15.3 Profile 14/1 |
168 | Table 136 – CP 14/1: AL service selection Table 137 – CP 14/1: AL protocol selection |
169 | Table 138 – CP 14/1: Performance indicator overview Table 139 – CP 14/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
171 | Table 140 – CP 14/1: Consistent set of performance indicators |
172 | 15.4 Profile 14/2 Table 141 – CP 14/2: DLL service selection Table 142 – CP 14/2: DLL protocol selection |
173 | Table 143 – CP 14/2: AL service selection Table 144 – CP 14/2: AL protocol selection |
174 | Table 145 – CP 14/2: Performance indicator overview Table 146 – CP 14/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
176 | 15.5 Profile 14/3 Table 147 – CP 14/2: Consistent set of performance indicators |
177 | Table 148 – CP 14/3: DLL service selection Table 149 – CP 14/3: DLL protocol selection |
178 | Table 150 – CP 14/3: AL service selection Table 151 – CP 14/3: AL protocol selection Table 152 – CP 14/3: Performance indicator overview |
179 | Table 153 – CP 14/3: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
181 | Table 154 – CP 14/3: Consistent set of performance indicators |
182 | Table 155 – CP 14/3: Consistent set of performance indicators Table 156 – CP 14/3: Consistent set of performance indicators |
183 | 16 Communication Profile Family 15 (MODBUS-RTPS) – RTE communication profiles 16.1 General overview 16.2 Profile 15/1 |
184 | Table 157 – CP 15/1: AL service selection Table 158 – CP 15/1: AL protocol selection Table 159 – CP 15/1: Performance indicator overview |
185 | Table 160 – CP 15/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
188 | 16.3 Profile 15/2 |
189 | Table 161 – CP 15/2: AL service selection Table 162 – CP 15/2: AL protocol selection Table 163 – CP 15/2: Performance indicator overview |
190 | Table 164 – CP 15/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
193 | 17 Communication Profile Family 16 (SERCOS )- RTE communication profiles 17.1 General overview |
194 | 17.2 Profile 16/3 (SERCOS III) Table 165 – CP 16/3: DLL service selection Table 166 – CP 16/3: DLL protocol selection Table 167 – CP 16/3: AL service selection |
195 | Table 168 – CP 16/3: AL protocol selection Table 169 – CP 16/3: Performance indicator overview |
196 | Table 170 – CP 16/3: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
199 | Table 171 – CP 16/3: scenario with a minimum cycle time of 31,25 μs |
200 | Table 172 – CP 16/3: scenario with a cycle time of 500 μs (real-time only) Table 173 – CP 16/3: Scenario with a cycle time of 500 μs (real-time and non real time) |
201 | 18 Communication Profile Family 17(RAPIEnet) – RTE communication profiles 18.1 General overview Table 174 – CP 16/3: scenario with non symmetrical data throughput and a cycle time of 500 μs (real-time and non real time) Table 175 – CPF 17: Overview of profile sets |
202 | 18.2 Profile 17/1 Table 176 – CP 17/1: DLL service selection Table 177 – CP 17/1: DLL protocol selection Table 178 – CP 17/1: AL service selection |
203 | Table 179 – CP 17/1: AL protocol selection Table 180 – CP 17/1: Performance indicator overview |
204 | Table 181 – CP 17/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
207 | 19 Communication Profile Family 18 (SafetyNET p ) – RTE communication profiles 19.1 General overview Table 182 – Consistent set of PIs small size automation system Table 183 – Parameters for Calculation of Consistent set of performance indicators |
208 | 19.2 Profile 18/1 |
209 | Table 184 – CP 18/1: DLL service selection |
210 | Table 185 – CP 18/1: DLL protocol selection |
211 | Table 186 – CP 18/1: AL service selection Table 187 – CP 18/1: AL protocol selection |
212 | Table 188 – CP 18/1: Performance indicator overview Table 189 – CP 18/1: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
214 | 19.3 Profile 18/2 |
215 | Table 190 – CP 18/2: DLL service selection |
216 | Table 191 – CP 18/2: DLL protocol selection |
217 | Table 192 – CP 18/2: AL service selection |
218 | Table 193 – CP 18/2: AL protocol selection Table 194 – CP 18/2: Performance indicator overview |
219 | Table 195 – CP 18/2: Performance indicator dependency matrix |
221 | Annex A (informative) Performance Indicator calculation |
223 | Figure A.1 – CP 3/4: Example of line structure Figure A.2 – CP 3/4: Example of ring structure |
224 | Figure A.3 – CP 3/4: Example of a wireless segment Figure A.4 – CP 3/4: Example of an integrated wireless client |
225 | Figure A.5 – CP 3/5: Example of line structure Figure A.6 – CP 3/5: Example of ring structure |
226 | Figure A.7 – CP 3/6: Example of line structure |
227 | Figure A.8 – CP 3/6: Example of ring structure |
228 | Figure A.9 – CP 3/6: Example of tree structure |
229 | Figure A.10 — CP 3/6: Example of comb structure |
230 | Figure A.11 – Definition of bridge delay |
231 | Figure A.12 – Example of a switch structure |
232 | Figure A.13 – Application configuration |
234 | Figure A.14 – Non RTE throughput calculation |
235 | Figure A.15 – Non time-base synchronization accuracy |
239 | Bibliography |