ASME PTC 46 2015
$98.04
ASME PTC-46 Overall Plant Performance
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASME | 2015 | 306 |
This Code applies to any plant size. It can be used to measure the performance of a plant in its normal operating condition, with all equipment in a clean and fully functional condition. This Code provides explicit methods and procedures for combined cycle power plants and for most gas, liquid, and solid fueled Rankine cycle plants. There is no intent to restrict the use of this Code for other types of heat cycle power plants, providing the explicit procedures can be met. For example, the performance equations and test methods herein are applicable to the steam cycle portion of a solar plant, or of a nuclear plant steam cycle. Refer to ASME PTC 47 for power block thermal performance test procedures associated with an IGCC plant (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle). This Code does not apply to component testing, for example, gas turbines (ASME PTC 22) or steam turbines (ASME PTC 6 or ASME PTC 6.2) or other individual components. To test a particular power plant or cogeneration facility in accordance with this Code, the following must be met: (a) a means must be available to determine, through either direct or indirect measurements, all of the heat inputs entering the test boundary and all of the electrical power and secondary outputs leaving the test boundary; (b) a means must be available to determine, through either direct or indirect measurements, all of the parameters to correct the results from the test to the base reference condition; (c) the test result uncertainties should be less than or equal to the uncertainties given in subsection 1-3 for the applicable plant type; and (d) the working fluid for vapor cycles must be steam. This restriction is imposed only to the extent that other fluids may require measurements or measurement methods different from those provided by this Code for steam cycles. Tests addressing other power plant performance-related issues are outside the scope of this Code. These include the following: (a) emissions tests: testing to verify compliance with regulatory emissions levels (e.g., airborne gaseous and particulate, solid and wastewater, noise, etc.), or required for calibration and certification of emission-monitoring systems. (b) operational demonstration tests: the various standard power plant tests typically conducted during startup, or periodically thereafter, to demonstrate specified operating capabilities (e.g., minimum load operation, automatic load control and load ramp rate, fuel switching capability, etc.). (c) reliability tests: tests conducted over an extended period of days or weeks to demonstrate the capability of the power plant to produce a specified minimum output level or availability. The measurement methods, calculations, and corrections to design conditions included herein may be of use in designing tests of this type; however, this Code does not address this type of testing in terms of providing explicit testing procedures or acceptance criteria.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | NOTICE |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | ASME PTC COMMITTEE ROSTER |
11 | CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PTC COMMITTEE |
13 | INTRODUCTION |
14 | Section 1 Object and Scope 1-1 OBJECT 1-2 SCOPE 1-3 TEST UNCERTAINTY |
15 | 1-4 REFERENCES Tables Table 1-3-1 Largest Allowable Test Uncertainties |
17 | Section 2 Definitions and Descriptions of Terms 2-1 DEFINITIONS OF CORRECTION FACTORS 2-2 TERMS |
18 | Table 2-1.1-1 Symbols Table 2-1.1-2 Subscripts |
21 | Section 3 Guiding Principles 3-1 INTRODUCTION |
23 | Table 3-1.4.1-1 Guidance for Establishing Permissible Deviations From Design (All ± Values) |
24 | Figures Fig. 3-1.5-1 Generic Test Boundary Fig. 3-1.5-2 Typical Steam Plant Test Boundary |
25 | Fig. 3-1.5-3 Typical Combined Cycle Plant Test Boundary |
27 | 3-2 TEST PLAN |
28 | Table 3-1.10-1 Design, Construction, and Start-up Considerations |
29 | 3-3 TEST PREPARATIONS |
30 | 3-4 CONDUCT OF THE TEST Table 3-4-1 Typical Pretest Stabilization Periods Table 3-4-2 Recommended Minimum Test Run Durations |
34 | 3-5 CALCULATION AND REPORTING OF RESULTS Fig. 3-4.4.3-1 Three Post-test Cases |
36 | Section 4 Instruments and Methods of Measurement 4-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS |
40 | 4-2 PRESSURE MEASUREMENT |
43 | Fig. 4-2.6.2-1 Five-Way Manifold |
44 | 4-3 TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT |
45 | Fig. 4-2.6.2-2 Water Leg Correction for Flow Measurement |
46 | Table 4-2.6.2-1 Units and Conversion Factor for Water Leg Correction for Flow Measurement |
47 | Fig. 4-3.3.2.1-1 Four-Wire RTDs |
48 | Fig. 4-3.3.2.2-1 Three-Wire RTDs |
49 | Fig. 4-3.6.2-1 Flow-Through Well |
52 | 4-4 HUMIDITY MEASUREMENT |
54 | 4-5 FLOW MEASUREMENT |
55 | Table 4-5.1-1 Recommendations for Differential Pressure Meters for Different Applications |
57 | Table 4-5.3.1-1 Units and Conversion Factor for Mass Flow Through a Differential Pressure Class Meter |
58 | Table 4-5.3.1-2 Summary Uncertainty of Discharge Coefficient and Expansion Factor |
61 | 4-6 PRIMARY HEAT INPUT MEASUREMENT |
62 | 4-7 ELECTRICAL GENERATION MEASUREMENT |
63 | Table 4-7.3-1 Metering Method Restrictions Summary |
64 | Fig. 4-7.3.1-1 Three-Wire Metering System |
65 | Fig. 4-7.3.2-1 Four-Wire Metering System |
69 | 4-8 GRID FREQUENCY 4-9 DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING |
71 | Section 5 Calculations and Results 5-1 FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS 5-2 MEASURED PLANT POWER AND HEAT INPUT TERMS IN THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS |
72 | Table 5-1-1 Summary of Additive Correction Factors in Fundamental Performance Equations |
73 | Table 5-1-2 Summary of Multiplicative Correction Factors in Fundamental Performance Equations |
74 | 5-3 PARTICULARIZING FUNDAMENTAL PERFORMANCE EQUATIONS TO SPECIFIC CYCLES AND TEST OBJECTIVES |
76 | 5-4 DISCUSSION OF APPLICATION OF CORRECTION FACTORS Table 5-3.4-1 Examples of Typical Cycles and Test Objectives — Corresponding Specific Performance Equations |
79 | Fig. 5-4.1.5-1 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction Factor, 5A or w5A |
80 | Fig. 5-4.1.5-2 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction Factor, 5B or w5B |
81 | Fig. 5-4.1.5-3 Typical Test Boundary for a Power Plant Requiring Application of Heat Sink Correction Factor, 5C or w5C |
83 | 5-5 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF PERFORMANCE EQUATIONS AS APPLIED TO COMBINED CYCLES |
85 | Table 5-5.3-1 Required Test Series for Phased Construction Combined Cycle Plants |
88 | 5-6 SPECIAL CASE WHEN PIPING IS OUTSIDE THE TEST BOUNDARY 5-7 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS AS APPLIED TO STEAM TURBINE PLANTS |
89 | Fig. 5-7.3-1 Output Versus Throttle Steam Flow |
90 | Fig. 5-7.4-1 Typical Test Boundary for a Reheat Rankine Steam Cycle Power Plant |
91 | Section 6 Report of Results 6-1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 6-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6-3 INTRODUCTION 6-4 CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS |
92 | 6-5 INSTRUMENTATION 6-6 CONCLUSIONS 6-7 APPENDICES |
93 | Section 7 Test Uncertainty 7-1 INTRODUCTION 7-2 PRETEST UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS 7-3 POST-TEST UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS 7-4 INPUTS FOR AN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS |
94 | NONMANDATORY APPENDICES NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A SAMPLE CALCULATIONS, COMBINED CYCLE COGENERATION PLANT WITHOUT DUCT FIRING A-1 GENERAL A-2 CYCLE DESCRIPTION A-3 TEST BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A-4 REFERENCE AND MEASURED CONDITIONS A-5 MEASURED RESULTS |
95 | Table A-4-1 Reference and Measured Conditions Table A-5-1 Measured Results A-5.1 Fundamental Equations Refer to Eqs. 5Ã3Ã1 and 5Ã3Ã2 A-6 REQUIRED CORRECTIONS AND CORRECTION FACTORS A-7 CORRECTIONS NOT REQUIRED A-8 CORRECTION CURVES AND FITTED EQUATIONS |
96 | Table A-6-1 Required Corrections and Correction Factors Table A-7-1 Correction Factors Not Required |
97 | A-9 DISCUSSION |
98 | Table A-9-1 Correction Factors |
100 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX B SAMPLE CALCULATIONS, COMBINED CYCLE COGENERATION PLANT WITH DUCT FIRING B-1 GENERAL B-2 CYCLE DESCRIPTION AND UNIT DESCRIPTION B-3 TEST BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION B-4 TABLE OF REFERENCE CONDITIONS |
101 | Fig. B-2-1 Cycle Diagram and Test Boundary |
102 | Table B-4-1 Reference Conditions B-5 REQUIRED CORRECTION FACTORS B-6 CORRECTION CURVES AND FITTED EQUATIONS |
103 | Table B-5-1 Required Correction Factors Table B-5-2 Measured Data |
105 | Fig. B-6-1 Correction to Heat Input for Thermal Efflux |
106 | Fig. B-6-2 Correction to Heat Input for Gas Turbine Power Factor |
107 | Fig. B-6-3 Correction to Heat Input for Steam Turbine Power Factor |
108 | Fig. B-6-4 Correction to Heat Input for HP Blowdown |
109 | Fig. B-6-5 Correction to Heat Input for Excess Cycle Makeup |
110 | Fig. B-6-6 Correction to Heat Input for Steam Turbine Condenser Pressure |
111 | Fig. B-6-7 Correction to Heat Input for Measured Power Different Than Design |
112 | Fig. B-6-8 Correction to Heat Rate for Inlet Air Temperature |
113 | Fig. B-6-9 Correction to Heat Rate for Ambient Pressure |
114 | Fig. B-6-10 Correction to Heat Rate for Fuel Temperature |
115 | Fig. B-6-11 Correction to Heat Rate for Fuel Analysis |
117 | B-7 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS |
118 | Table B-7-1 Peformance Corrections |
119 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX C SAMPLE CALCULATIONS, COMBINED CYCLE COGENERATION PLANT WITHOUT DUCT FIRING C-1 INTRODUCTION C-2 TEST BOUNDARY C-3 TEST REFERENCE CONDITION C-4 CORRECTION FACTORS |
120 | C-5 CORRECTED CURVES AND FITTED EQUATIONS C-6 SAMPLE CALCULATION AND RESULTS C-7 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS |
121 | Fig. C-1-1 Test Boundary for Combined Cycle/Cogeneration Plant With External Cooling Source |
122 | Fig. C-5-1 Inlet Temperature Correction Factors |
123 | Fig. C-5-2 Inlet Pressure Correction Factors |
124 | Inlet |
125 | Fig. C-5-4 Net Process Steam Energy Correction Factors |
126 | Fig. C-5-5 Blowdown Flow Correction Factors |
127 | Fig. C-5-6 Condenser Cooling Temperature Correction Factors |
128 | Table C-4-1 Applicable Correction Factors Table C-5-1 Inlet Temperature Correction Factors Table C-5-2 Barometric Pressure Correction Factors |
129 | Table C-5-3 Inlet Relative Humidity Correction Factors Table C-5-4 Net Process Steam Energy Correction Factors |
130 | Table C-5-5 Blowdown Flow Correction Factors Table C-5-6 Condenser Cooling Temperature Correction Factors Table C-6-1 Measured Data Table C-6-2 Calculated Values Table C-6-3 Correction Factor Values Table C-6-4 Calculated Values |
131 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX D REPRESENTATION OF CORRECTION FOR DIFFERENT HEAT SINK TEMPERATURE THAN GAS TURBINE AIR INLET TEMPERATURE Delta5 OR omega5, IF NECESSARY, FOR A TYPICAL COMBINED CYCLE PLANT D-1 GENERAL |
132 | Fig. D-1-1 Gas Turbine Inlet Temperature Correction Curve |
133 | Fig. D-1-2 Inlet Air Condition Difference Between Cooling Tower and Gas Turbine |
134 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX E SAMPLE CALCULATION OF A COAL-FIRED SUPERCRITICAL CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE BASED PLANT E-1 CYCLE DESCRIPTION E-2 TEST BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION E-3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TEST CASES, MODELS, AND CORRECTIONS |
135 | E-3.1 Case 1 Sample Calculation: Specified Measured Output E-3.1.1 Corrected Output. E-3.1.2 Corrected Fuel Energy Input and Corrected Heat Rate. |
136 | Table E-3.1-1 Example of Test Boundary Conditions for Supercritical Unit — Case 1 |
137 | Table E-3.1-2 Case 1 Measured Data |
139 | Table E-3.1.1-1 Case 1 Corrected Test Results |
140 | E-3.2 Case 2 Sample Calculation: Specified Steam Flow |
141 | Table E-3.2-1 Example of Test Boundary Conditions for Supercritical Unit — Case 2 |
142 | Table E-3.2-2 Case 2 Measured Test Data |
145 | E-3.2.1 Corrected Output. E-3.2.2 Corrected Fuel Boiler Output and Corrected Heat Rate. |
146 | Table E-3.2.1-1 Case 2 Corrected Test Results |
148 | Fig. E-3.3-1 Change in Heat Input vs. Process Steam Flow Fig. E-3.3-2 Change in Heat Input vs. Process Steam Temperature E-3.3 Case 1 Correction Curves E-3.4 Case 2 Correction Curves E-3.5 Design Cases and Test Runs |
149 | Fig. E-3.3-3 Change in Heat Input vs. Steam Turbine Generator Power Factor Fig. E-3.3-4 Change in Heat Input vs. Ambient Temperature |
150 | Fig. E-3.3-5 Change in Heat Input vs. Relative Humidity Fig. E-3.3-6 Change in Heat Input vs. River Water Temperature |
151 | Fig. E-3.3-7 Change in Heat Input vs. Auxiliary Loads Fig. E-3.3-8 Change in Heat Input vs. Change in Net Output |
152 | Fig. E-3.4-1 Change in Net Output vs. Process Steam Flow Fig. E-3.4-2 Change in Net Output vs. Process Steam Pressure |
153 | Fig. E-3.4-3 Change in Net Output vs. Process Steam Temperature Fig. E-3.4-4 Change in Net Output vs. Steam Turbine Generator Power Factor |
154 | Fig. E-3.4-5 Change in Net Output vs. Makeup Temperature Fig. E-3.4-6 Change in Net Output vs. River Water Temperature |
155 | Fig. E-3.4-7 Change in Net Output vs. Change in Throttle Flow Fig. E-3.4-8 Change in Boiler Output vs. Process Steam Flow |
156 | Fig. E-3.4-9 Change in Boiler Output vs. Change in Throttle Flow |
157 | Fig. E-3.5-1 Design Case 1 (U.S. Customary Units) |
158 | Fig. E-3.5-1M Design Case 1 (SI Units) |
159 | Fig. E-3.5-2 Test Run 1A (U.S. Customary Units) |
160 | Fig. E-3.5-2M Test Run 1A (SI Units) |
161 | Fig. E-3.5-3 Test Run 1B (U.S. Customary Units) |
162 | Fig. E-3.5-3M Test Run 1B (SI Units) |
163 | Fig. E-3.5-4 Test Run 1C (U.S. Customary Units) |
164 | Fig. E-3.5-4M Test Run 1C (SI Units) |
165 | Fig. E-3.5-5 Design Case 2 (U.S. Customary Units) |
166 | Fig. E-3.5-5M Design Case 2 (SI Units) |
167 | Fig. E-3.5-6 Test Run 2A (U.S. Customary Units) |
168 | Fig. E-3.5-6M Test Run 2A (SI Units) |
169 | Fig. E-3.5-7 Test Run 2B (U.S. Customary Units) |
170 | Fig. E-3.5-7M Test Run 2B (SI Units) |
171 | Fig. E-3.5-8 Test Run 2C (U.S. Customary Units) |
172 | Fig. E-3.5-8M Test Run 2C (SI Units) |
173 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX F SAMPLE UNCERTAINTY CALCULATION: COMBINED CYCLE PLANT WITHOUT DUCT FIRING F-1 INTRODUCTION F-2 CYCLE DESCRIPTION AND UNIT DISPOSITION F-3 TEST BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION |
174 | Fig. F-3-1 Combined Cycle Plant Air-Cooled Condenser-Process Flow Diagram |
175 | F-4 MEASUREMENTS F-5 REFERENCE CONDITIONS F-6 MEASURED CONDITIONS F-7 FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS AND APPLICABLE CORRECTIONS |
176 | Table F-4-1 Performance Test Measurements and Instruments |
177 | Table F-5-1 Performance Reference Conditions |
178 | Table F-6-1 Performance Test 1 Measured Conditions |
179 | Table F-6-2 Performance Test 2 Measured Conditions |
180 | Table F-6-3 Performance Test 3 Measured Conditions |
181 | Table F-6-4 Performance Test 4 Measured Conditions Table F-6-5 Evaporative Cooler Test Averages |
182 | Table F-7-1 Summary of Additive Correction Factors |
183 | Table F-7-2 Summary of Multiplicative Correction Factors |
184 | F-8 CORRECTION CURVES AND POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS F-9 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS AND CORRECTED TEST RESULT F-10 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS APPROACH F-11 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS GENERAL EQUATIONS AND TERMS |
185 | Fig. F-8-1 Correction to Power for Gas Turbine Generator Power Factor (U.S. Customary Units) |
186 | Fig. F-8-1M Correction to Power for Gas Turbine Generator Power Factor (SI Units) |
187 | Fig. F-8-2 Correction to Power for Steam Turbine Generator Power Factor (U.S. Customary Units) |
188 | Fig. F-8-2M Correction to Power for Steam Turbine Generator Power Factor (SI Units) |
189 | Fig. F-8-3 Correction to Power for ACC Inlet Dry Bulb Temperature (U.S. Customary Units) |
190 | Fig. F-8-3M Correction to Power for ACC Inlet Dry Bulb Temperature (SI Units) |
191 | Fig. F-8-4 Correction to Power for Ambient Dry Bulb Temperature (U.S. Customary Units) |
192 | Fig. F-8-4M Correction to Power for Ambient Dry Bulb Temperature (SI Units) |
193 | Fig. F-8-5 Correction to Heat Rate for Ambient Dry Bulb Temperature (U.S. Customary Units) |
194 | Fig. F-8-5M Correction to Heat Rate for Ambient Dry Bulb Temperature (SI Units) |
195 | Fig. F-8-6 Correction to Power for Barometric Pressure (U.S. Customary Units) |
196 | Fig. F-8-6M Correction to Power for Barometric Pressure (SI Units) |
197 | Fig. F-8-7 Correction to Heat Rate for Barometric Pressure (U.S. Customary Units) |
198 | Fig. F-8-7M Correction to Heat Rate for Barometric Pressure (SI Units) |
199 | Fig. F-8-8 Correction to Power for Ambient Relative Humidity (U.S. Customary Units) |
200 | Fig. F-8-8M Correction to Power for Ambient Relative Humidity (SI Units) |
201 | Fig. F-8-9 Correction to Heat Rate for Ambient Relative Humidity (U.S. Customary Units) |
202 | Fig. F-8-9M Correction to Heat Rate for Ambient Relative Humidity (SI Units) |
203 | Fig. F-8-10 Correction to Power for Fuel Composition (U.S. Customary Units) |
204 | Fig. F-8-10M Correction to Power for Fuel Composition (SI Units) |
205 | Fig. F-8-11 Correction to Heat Rate for Fuel Composition (U.S. Customary Units) |
206 | Fig. F-8-11M Correction to Heat Rate for Fuel Composition (SI Units) |
207 | Fig. F-8-12 Correction to Power and Heat Rate for Evaporative Cooler Performance (U.S. Customary Units) |
208 | Fig. F-8-12M Correction to Power and Heat Rate for Evaporative Cooler Performance (SI Units) |
209 | Table F-8-1 Summary of Correction Curve Coefficients (SI Units) |
210 | Table F-8-2 Summary of Correction Curve Coefficients (U.S. Customary Units) |
211 | Table F-9-1 Summary of Measured Parameters, Corrections, and Results (SI Units) |
213 | Table F-9-2 Summary of Measured Parameters, Corrections, and Results (U.S. Customary Units) |
215 | Table F-12-1 Pressure Transmitter Operating and Vendor Information F-12 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS F-12.1 Stated Accuracy |
216 | Table F-12.3-1 Pressure Transmitter Reference Uncertainty/Calibration Uncertainty F-12.2 Calibration Uncertainty F-12.3 Stated Uncertainty Reference Uncertainty/Calibration Uncertainty RU/CU F-12.4 Ambient Temperature Effect TE F-12.5 Line Pressure Effect Zero Error LPZE F-12.6 Line Pressure Effect Span Error LPSE F-12.7 Mounting Position Effect MPE F-12.8 Vibration Effect VE F-12.9 Power Supply Effect PSE |
217 | Table F-12.4-1 Ambient Temperature Effect Table F-12.6-1 Line Pressure Effect Span Error F-12.10 RFI Effect RFIE F-12.11 Data Acquisition Effect DAE F-13 THERMISTOR TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS |
218 | Table F-12.11-1 Total Pressure Transmitter Performance Specification Uncertainty Table F-13-1 Thermistor Operating and Vendor Information F-13.1 Thermistor Stated Accuracy Reference Uncertainty/Calibration Uncertainty TRU/CU |
219 | F-13.2 Thermistor Environmental Effect TEE F-13.3 Thermistor Stability Effects TSE F-13.4 Thermistor Self Heating Effects TSHE F-13.5 Thermistor Heat Transfer Effects THTE F-13.6 DAS Stated Accuracy Reference Uncertainty/Calibration Uncertainty DRU/CU |
220 | Table F-13.5-1 Total Thermistor Performance Specification Uncertainty |
221 | F-13.7 DAS Environmental Test Effect DEE |
222 | F-13.8 DAS Stability Effects DSE F-13.9 DAS Parasitic Resistance Effect DPRE F-13.10 DAS Parasitic Voltage Effect DPVE |
223 | Table F-13.10-1 Thermal Electric Potentials for Common Types of Connections |
224 | Table F-13.10-2 Total DAS Performance Specification Uncertainty Table F-13.10-3 Total Thermistor Temperature Measurement Systematic Uncertainty F-14 RELATIVE HUMIDITY TRANSMITTER SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS |
225 | Table F-14.6-1 Total Humidity Transmitter Performance Specification Uncertainty F-14.1 Stated Accuracy Reference Uncertainty/Calibration Uncertainty RU/CU F-14.2 Ambient Temperature Effect TE F-14.3 Vibration Effect VE F-14.4 Power Supply Effect PSE F-14.5 RFI Effect RFIE F-14.6 Data Acquisition Effect DAE |
226 | Table F-15.1-1 Power Meter Stated Accuracy Systematic Uncertainty F-15 POWER METER SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS F-15.1 Power Meter Stated Accuracy TRU/CU F-15.2 Ambient Temperature Effect TE F-15.3 Power Factor Effect PFE |
227 | Table F-15.6-1 Total Power Meter Performance Specification Uncertainty F-15.4 Input Range Effect IRE F-15.5 Line Filter Effect LFE F-15.6 Aging Effect AE |
228 | Table F-15.6-2 Total Transformer Uncertainty Table F-15.6-3 Total Power Systematic Measurement Uncertainty |
229 | F-16 FUEL ANALYSIS/HEATING VALUE/COMPRESSIBILITY/MOISTURE CONTENT SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS F-16.1 Calibration Gas Composition Uncertainty CGCU F-16.2 Chromatograph Method Effect CME |
230 | Table F-16.1-1 Calibration Gas Uncertainty |
231 | Table F-16.2-1 Converted ASTM D1945 Reproducibility F-16.3 Gas Sampling Method Effect GSME |
232 | Table F-16.2-2 Relative Reproducibility for Test 1 and Test 2 Table F-16.2-3 Relative Reproducibility for Test 3 and Test 4 |
233 | Table F-16.3-1 Total Fuel Constituent Performance Specification Uncertainty for Test 1 Table F-16.3-2 Total Fuel Constituent Performance Specification Uncertainty for Test 2 |
234 | Table F-16.3-3 Total Fuel Constituent Performance Specification Uncertainty for Test 3 Table F-16.3-4 Total Fuel Constituent Performance Specification Uncertainty for Test 4 |
235 | F-17 PLANT FUEL FLOW SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY |
236 | F-18 INSTRUMENT SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY F-19 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS |
237 | Table F-17-1 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
238 | Table F-17-2 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
239 | Table F-17-3 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
240 | Table F-17-4 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
241 | Table F-17-5 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
242 | Table F-17-6 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
243 | Table F-17-7 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
244 | Table F-17-8 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
245 | Table F-17-9 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
246 | Table F-17-10 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
247 | Table F-17-11 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
248 | Table F-17-12 Plant Fuel Flow Post-test Systematic Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
249 | F-20 SUMMARY OF INSTRUMENT SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY F-21 SPATIAL SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY F-22 DATA REDUCTION UNCERTAINTY |
250 | Table F-19-1 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
251 | Table F-19-2 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
252 | Table F-19-3 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
253 | Table F-19-4 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
254 | Table F-19-5 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
255 | Table F-19-6 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
256 | Table F-19-7 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
257 | Table F-19-8 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
258 | Table F-19-9 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
259 | Table F-19-10 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
260 | Table F-19-11 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
261 | Table F-19-12 Plant Fuel Flow Post-Test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
262 | Table F-20-1 Summary of Instrument Systematic Uncertainty |
263 | Table F-21-1 Summary of Spatial Systematic Uncertainty Table F-21-2 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (Compressor Inlet Temperature in °C) |
264 | Table F-21-3 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (Compressor Inlet Temperature in °F) Table F-21-4 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (Filter House Temperature in °C) |
265 | Table F-21-5 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (Filter House Temperature in °F) Table F-21-6 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (ACC Dry Bulb Temperature in °C) |
266 | Table F-21-7 Calculation of Systematic Uncertainty Due to Spatial Variation (ACC Dry Bulb Temperature in °F) F-23 OVERALL SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY F-24 RANDOM UNCERTAINTY |
267 | Table F-23-1 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
268 | Table F-23-2 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
269 | Table F-23-3 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
270 | Table F-23-4 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
271 | Table F-23-5 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
272 | Table F-23-6 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
273 | able F-23-7 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
274 | Table F-23-8 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
275 | Table F-23-9 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 1) |
276 | Table F-23-10 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 2) |
277 | Table F-23-11 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 3) |
278 | Table F-23-12 Corrected Net Plant Output and Net Plant Heat Rate Post-test Uncertainty Analysis (Test Run 4) |
279 | Table F-23-13 Uncertainty Analysis Summary, SI Units Table F-23-14 Uncertainty Analysis Summary, U.S. Customary Units |
280 | F-25 TOTAL MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY F-26 SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTY OF CORRECTED RESULT |
281 | Table F-24-1 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (Plant Supply Fuel Flow DP for Test Run 1, cm-H2O) |
282 | Table F-24-2 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (Plant Supply Fuel Flow DP for Test Run 1, in.-H2O) |
283 | Table F-24-3 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (Plant Supply Fuel Flow Pressure for Test Run 1, bara) |
284 | Table F-24-4 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (Plant Supply Fuel Flow Pressure for Test Run 1, psia) |
285 | Table F-24-5 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (ACC Inlet Dry Bulb Temperature for Test Run 1, °C) |
286 | Table F-24-6 Calculation of Standard Deviation of the Mean (ACC Inlet Dry Bulb Temperature for Test Run 1, °F) |
287 | Table F-24-7 Summary of Student’s t Determination for Test Run 1 |
289 | F-27 RANDOM UNCERTAINTY OF CORRECTED RESULT F-28 TOTAL UNCERTAINTY OF CORRECTED RESULT |
290 | Table F-29-1 Evaporative Cooler Effectiveness Test Instrument Uncertainty Table F-29-2 Evaporative Cooler Effectiveness Test Spatial Uncertainty F-29 UNCERTAINTY OF A SEPARATE EVAPORATIVE COOLER EFFECTIVENESS TEST |
291 | Table F-29-3 GT 1 Evaporative Cooler Effectiveness Post-test Uncertainty Analysis |
292 | Table F-29-4 GT 2 Evaporative Cooler Effectiveness Post-test Uncertainty Analysis |
293 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX G ENTERING AIR CONDITIONS G-1 GENERAL |
294 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX H METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE PART LOAD TEST CORRECTED HEAT RATE AT A SPECIFIED REFERENCE CONDITION FOR A COMBINED CYCLE PLANT H-1 INTRODUCTION H-2 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS H-3 CONDUCTING THE TEST |
296 | H-4 CORRECTION METHOD H-5 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS |
297 | Fig. H-4-1 Table H-5.1-1 Example Table of Values H-5.1 Example 1 Ambient Temperature Bivariate With Part Load Fraction H-5.1.1 Determination. H-5.1.2 Solution. |
299 | H-5-1.2.1 Determine the Ambient Temperature and Load Correction Factors for Heat Rate. |
300 | Table H-5.2-1 Example Table of Values H-5-1.2.2 Calculate the Corrected Part Load Heat Rate. H-5.2 Example 2 Ambient Temperature is Not Bivariate With Part Load Fraction H-5.2.1 Determination. H-5.2.2 Solution. |
301 | Fig. H-5.2.2-1 H-5.2.2.1 Determine the Load Correction Factor for Heat Rate. |
302 | H-5.2.2.2 Calculate the Corrected Part Load Heat Rate. |
303 | NONMANDATORY APPENDIX I PLANT TESTING WITH INLET AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT OUT OF SERVICE I-1 INLET AIR-CONDITIONING CONSIDERATIONS I-2 EVAPORATIVE COOLERS AND FOGGERS |
304 | Table I-2-1 Example Change in Compressor Inlet Temperature for High Relative Humidity Table I-2-2 Example Change in Compressor Inlet Temperature for Low Relative Humidity I-3 OTHER INLET CONDITIONING SYSTEMS |