BSI PD IEC TS 63001:2024 – TC
$217.84
Tracked Changes. Measurement of cavitation noise in ultrasonic baths and ultrasonic reactors
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2024 | 87 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | 30487612 |
48 | A-30405950 |
49 | undefined |
51 | CONTENTS |
53 | FOREWORD |
55 | INTRODUCTION |
56 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
60 | 4 List of symbols |
61 | 5 Measurement equipment 5.1 Hydrophone 5.1.1 General 5.1.2 Calibration of hydrophone sensitivity 5.1.3 Hydrophone properties |
62 | 5.1.4 Hydrophone compatibility with environment 5.2 Analyser 5.2.1 General considerations |
63 | 5.2.2 Specific measurement method: inertial cavitation spectrum measurement at frequencies between harmonics of f0 5.2.3 Specific measurement method: Measurement of integrated broadband cavitation noise energy between two frequency bounds |
64 | 5.2.4 Specific measurement method: cavitation noise measurement by extraction of broadband spectral components 5.3 Requirements for equipment being characterized 5.3.1 Temperature and chemistry compatibility with the hydrophone 5.3.2 Electrical interference 6 Measurement procedure 6.1 Reference measurements 6.1.1 Control of environmental conditions for reference measurements |
65 | 6.1.2 Measurement procedure for reference measurements 6.2 In-situ monitoring measurements |
66 | Annexes Annex A (informative) Background A.1 Cavitation in ultrasonic cleaning Figures Figure A.1 – Typical setup of an ultrasonic cleaning device |
67 | Figure A.2 – Spatial distribution of the acoustic pressure level in waterin front of a 35 kHz transducer with reflections on all sides of the water bath (0,12 m × 0,3 m × 0,25 m) Figure A.3 – Typical Fourier spectrum for sinusoidal ultrasound excitation above the cavitation threshold at an operating frequency of 35 kHz |
68 | A.2 Practical considerations for measurements Figure A.4 –Photograph of cavitation structure under the water surface at an operating frequency of 25 kHz |
69 | A.3 Measurement procedure in the ultrasonic bath Figure A.5 – Typical rectangular ultrasound signal with a frequency of 25 kHz and 50 Hz double half wave modulation |
70 | A.4 Characterization methods that do not utilize the acoustic spectrum |
71 | Annex B (normative) Cavitation noise measurement between harmonics of f0 B.1 General B.2 Measurement method |
73 | Figure B.1 – Block diagram of the measuring method of the cavitation noise level LCN |
75 | Annex C (informative) Example of cavitation noise measurement between harmonics of f0 Figure C.1 – Power dependency of the cavitation noise level LCN Figure C.2 – Diagram with example of spectral acoustic pressure of an ultrasonic bath with an operating frequency of 46 kHz and its harmonics and sub-harmonics |
76 | Annex D (normative) Measurement of integrated broadband cavitation noise energy between two frequency bounds D.1 General D.2 Measurement frequency range D.3 Definition of integrated broadband cavitation noise energy |
77 | Annex E (informative) Example of measurement of integrated broadband cavitation noise energy between two frequency bounds Figure E.1 – Schematic of the cylindrical cavitation hollow cavitation sensor [27], [28] |
78 | Figure E.2 – High-frequency spectra obtained from the cavitation sensor of the type shown in Figure E.1 [28] for a commercial ultrasonic cleaning vessel operating at 40 kHz whose nominal power setting has been changed from 5 % to 95 % of its full operating power |
79 | Figure E.3 – Variation in the integrated broadband cavitation energy derived usingthe cylindrical cavitation sensor, from the acoustic spectra shown in Figure E.2 Figure E.4 – Raster scan covering a commercial ultrasonic cleaning vessel with four transducers operating at 40 kHz |
80 | Annex F (normative) Cavitation noise measurement by extraction of broadband spectral components F.1 Compensation for extraneous noise F.2 Features of the acoustic pressure spectrum Figure F.1 – Schematic representation of acoustic pressure spectrum |
81 | F.3 Identification of the operating frequency f0 and direct field acoustic pressure F.3.1 Identification of the operating frequency f0 F.3.2 Fit to primary peak (direct field) F.3.3 Determination of RMS direct field acoustic pressure F.3.4 Validation F.4 Identification of cavitation noise components F.4.1 Subtraction of direct field component of spectrum F.4.2 Determination of non-broadband cavitation component |
82 | F.4.3 Determination of broadband cavitation component F.4.4 Validation |
83 | Bibliography |