BSI PD ISO/IEC TR 30172:2023
$215.11
Internet of things (loT). Digital twin. Use cases
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2023 | 180 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
8 | INTRODUCTION |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
11 | 4 Abbreviated terms 5 Applications 5.1 Application domains |
12 | 5.2 Life cycle stage coverage 6 Use cases 6.1 Overview 6.2 Properties |
13 | 6.3 Basic statistics 6.3.1 Use cases by application domain |
14 | Figures Figure 1 – Distribution of use cases collected in Annex B by application domains Tables Table 1 – List of use cases in JTC 1/AG 11 report |
15 | 6.3.2 Use cases by status of life cycle Figure 2 – Statistics on adopted key technologies from use cases in JTC 1/AG 11 report |
16 | 7 Use case summaries Table 2 – List of use cases by status of life cycle Table 3 – List of use cases |
18 | Annex A (informative)Use case template A.1 General A.2 Description of use case A.2.1 Name of use case A.2.2 Digital twin application area or context of use |
19 | A.2.3 Version management A.2.4 Basic information to use case |
20 | A.2.5 Scope of use case (bullet points) A.2.6 Objectives of use case (bullet points) A.2.7 Narrative of use case |
21 | A.2.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case A.2.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
22 | A.2.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case |
23 | A.2.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case A.2.12 Digital infrastructures Table A.1 – Description of some qualitative indicators |
24 | A.2.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) A.2.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) A.2.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) A.2.16 General remarks (optional) A.2.17 Challenges and issues (optional) |
25 | A.2.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) A.2.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) A.3 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case A.3.1 Drawing of use case A.3.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) A.3.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) |
26 | A.3.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) A.3.5 Others (optional) |
27 | Annex B (informative)Collected use cases B.1 Smart building – Smart building operation based on digital twins B.1.1 Description of use case B.1.1.1 Name of use case B.1.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.1.1.3 Version management |
28 | B.1.1.4 Basic information to use case B.1.1.5 Scope of use case B.1.1.6 Objectives of use case |
29 | B.1.1.7 Narrative of use case |
33 | B.1.1.8 Entities that need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
35 | B.1.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
36 | B.1.1.10 Life cycle of use case |
37 | B.1.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.1.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.1.1.13 Challenges and issues |
38 | B.1.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.1.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.1.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.1.1.17 General remarks (optional) B.1.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
39 | B.1.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.1.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.1.2.1 Drawing of use case |
40 | B.1.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.1.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.1.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) |
41 | B.1.2.5 Others (optional) B.2 Industrial smart park – Digital twin based industrial smart park design and construction B.2.1 Description of use case B.2.1.1 Name of use case B.2.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.2.1.3 Version management |
42 | B.2.1.4 Basic information to use case B.2.1.5 Scope of use case |
43 | B.2.1.6 Objectives of use case B.2.1.7 Narrative of use case |
45 | B.2.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case B.2.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
46 | B.2.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case |
47 | B.2.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.2.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.2.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.2.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) |
48 | B.2.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.2.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.2.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.2.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.2.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.2.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.2.2.1 Drawing of use case |
49 | B.2.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.2.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.2.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) |
50 | B.2.2.5 Others (optional) |
51 | B.3 Smart city – Digital twin based smart city management system B.3.1 Description of use case B.3.1.1 Name of use case B.3.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.3.1.3 Version management |
52 | B.3.1.4 Basic information to use case B.3.1.5 Scope of use case |
53 | B.3.1.6 Objectives of use case B.3.1.7 Narrative of use case |
56 | B.3.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
57 | B.3.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems B.3.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case |
58 | B.3.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.3.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
59 | B.3.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) |
60 | B.3.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.3.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.3.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.3.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.3.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.3.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) |
61 | B.3.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.3.2.1 Drawing of use case |
62 | B.3.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.3.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.3.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.3.2.5 Others (optional) |
63 | B.4 Smart energy – Construction and application of digital twins for a large oil and gas processing facility B.4.1 Description of use case B.4.1.1 Name of use case B.4.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.4.1.3 Version management B.4.1.4 Basic information to use case |
64 | B.4.1.5 Scope of use case B.4.1.6 Objectives of use case B.4.1.7 Narrative of use case |
66 | B.4.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
69 | B.4.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
72 | B.4.1.10 Life cycle of use case B.4.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case |
73 | B.4.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
74 | B.4.1.13 Challenges and issues B.4.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.4.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.4.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) |
75 | B.4.1.17 General remarks (optional) B.4.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.4.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.4.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.4.2.1 Drawing of use case B.4.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) |
76 | B.4.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.4.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.4.2.5 Others (optional) B.5 Smart building – Monitoring of water B.5.1 Description of use case B.5.1.1 Name of use case B.5.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.5.1.3 Version management |
77 | B.5.1.4 Basic information to use case B.5.1.5 Scope of use case |
78 | B.5.1.6 Objectives of use case B.5.1.7 Narrative of use case |
79 | B.5.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
81 | B.5.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems B.5.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case |
82 | B.5.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.5.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.5.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.5.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) |
83 | B.5.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.5.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.5.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.5.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.5.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) |
84 | B.5.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.5.2.1 Drawing of use case B.6 Smart Power Grid – Smart grid operation based on a digital twin B.6.1 Description of use case B.6.1.1 Name of use case B.6.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use |
85 | B.6.1.3 Version management B.6.1.4 Basic information to use case B.6.1.5 Scope of use case |
86 | B.6.1.6 Objectives of use case B.6.1.7 Narrative of use case |
88 | B.6.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
89 | B.6.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems B.6.1.10 Life cycle of use case |
90 | B.6.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.6.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.6.1.13 Challenges and issues |
91 | B.6.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.6.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.6.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.6.1.17 General remarks (optional) B.6.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
92 | B.6.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.6.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.6.2.1 Drawing of use case |
93 | B.6.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.6.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.6.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.6.2.5 Others (optional) B.7 Smart construction life cycle – Construction-phase digital twin model B.7.1 Description of use case B.7.1.1 Name of use case |
94 | B.7.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.7.1.3 Version management B.7.1.4 Basic information to use case |
95 | B.7.1.5 Scope of use case B.7.1.6 Objectives of use case B.7.1.7 Narrative of use case |
96 | Figure B.1 – Geometric analysis of safety prevention |
97 | Figure B.2 – Identification of close proximity events between heavy machinery Figure B.3 – Safety training scenario |
98 | Figure B.4 – Segmented construction components after voxel space point matching Figure B.5 – Sample defect predictions |
99 | Figure B.6 – On-site defect visualization, defect confirmation,and addition of remedial work |
100 | B.7.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
101 | B.7.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
102 | B.7.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case |
103 | B.7.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.7.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
104 | B.7.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.7.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.7.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.7.1.16 General remarks (optional) |
105 | B.7.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.7.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.7.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) |
106 | B.7.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.7.2.1 Drawing of use case Figure B.7 – Use case diagram: before construction starts |
107 | Figure B.8 – Use case diagram: during construction |
108 | B.7.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.7.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.7.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.7.2.5 Others (optional) B.8 Smart building – Residential explicit demand response – Consumer behavioural digital twin for energy demand prediction B.8.1 Description of use case B.8.1.1 Name of use case |
109 | B.8.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.8.1.3 Version management B.8.1.4 Basic information to use case |
110 | B.8.1.5 Scope of use case B.8.1.6 Objectives of use case B.8.1.7 Narrative of use case |
113 | B.8.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case B.8.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
115 | B.8.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case B.8.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.8.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
116 | B.8.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.8.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.8.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.8.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.8.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) |
117 | B.8.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
120 | B.8.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) |
121 | B.8.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.8.2.1 Drawing of use case B.8.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.8.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) |
122 | B.8.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.8.2.5 Others (optional) B.9 Smart city – Greater Hobart Digital Twin B.9.1 Description of use case B.9.1.1 Name of use case B.9.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.9.1.3 Version management |
123 | B.9.1.4 Basic information to use case |
124 | B.9.1.5 Scope of use case (bullet point) B.9.1.6 Objectives of use case |
125 | B.9.1.7 Narrative of use case B.9.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
126 | B.9.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
128 | B.9.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case B.9.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) |
129 | B.9.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.9.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) |
130 | B.9.1.14 Referenced papers or patent(optional) B.9.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.9.1.16 General remarks(optional) B.9.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.9.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
131 | B.9.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors(optional) B.9.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.9.2.1 Drawing of use case B.9.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) |
132 | B.9.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.9.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.10 Smart city – NSW Spatial Digital Twin B.10.1 Description of use case B.10.1.1 Name of use case B.10.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.10.1.3 Version management B.10.1.4 Basic information to use case |
133 | B.10.1.5 Scope of use case B.10.1.6 Objectives of use case |
134 | B.10.1.7 Narrative of use case B.10.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
136 | B.10.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
137 | B.10.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case B.10.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) |
138 | B.10.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.10.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) |
139 | B.10.1.14 Referenced papers or patent(optional) B.10.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.10.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.10.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.10.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
140 | B.10.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.10.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.10.2.1 Drawing of use case B.10.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.10.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.10.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case(optional) B.11 Transport – Sydney Trains Engineering and Maintenance Digital Twin B.11.1 Description of use case B.11.1.1 Name of use case |
141 | B.11.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.11.1.3 Version management B.11.1.4 Basic information to use case |
142 | B.11.1.5 Scope of use case B.11.1.6 Objectives of use case B.11.1.7 Narrative of use case |
143 | B.11.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case B.11.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
144 | B.11.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case B.11.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case |
145 | B.11.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.11.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.11.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) |
146 | B.11.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) B.11.1.16 General remarks(optional) B.11.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.11.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
147 | B.11.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.11.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.11.2.1 Drawing of use case |
149 | B.11.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.11.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.11.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) |
150 | B.11.2.5 Others (optional) B.12 Transport – TfNSW Infrastructure Delivery Digital Twin B.12.1 Description of use case B.12.1.1 Name of use case B.12.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use B.12.1.3 Version management |
151 | B.12.1.4 Basic information to use case B.12.1.5 Scope of use case |
152 | B.12.1.6 Objectives of use case B.12.1.7 Narrative of use case |
153 | B.12.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case B.12.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
154 | B.12.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case B.12.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case |
155 | B.12.1.12 Digital infrastructures B.12.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional) B.12.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional) B.12.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional) |
156 | B.12.1.16 General remarks (optional) B.12.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional) B.12.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
157 | B.12.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.12.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.12.2.1 Drawing of use case |
158 | B.12.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.12.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.12.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.12.2.5 Others (optional) |
159 | B.13 Smart energy – From grid planning to grid operation and maintenance, based on grid digital twin(s) B.13.1 Description of use case B.13.1.1 Name of use case B.13.1.2 Digital twin application area/context of use B.13.1.3 Version management B.13.1.4 Basic information to use case |
160 | B.13.1.5 Scope of use case B.13.1.6 Objectives of use case B.13.1.7 Narrative of use case |
161 | B.13.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
163 | B.13.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
164 | B.13.1.10 Life cycle of REAL systems applying digital twin use case B.13.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.13.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
165 | B.13.1.13 Referenced standards or standardization committees (optional) B.13.1.14 Challenges and issues (optional) B.13.1.15 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) |
166 | B.13.1.16 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) B.13.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.13.2.1 Drawing of use case |
167 | B.13.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) B.13.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.13.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.13.2.5 Others (optional) B.14 Smart energy – Electrical field level subsystem digital twin, as the basis for its specification, commissioning, operation and maintenance B.14.1 Description of use case B.14.1.1 Name of use case B.14.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use |
168 | B.14.1.3 Version management B.14.1.4 Basic information to use case |
169 | B.14.1.5 Scope of use case B.14.1.6 Objectives of use case B.14.1.7 Narrative of use case |
170 | B.14.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case |
173 | B.14.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems |
174 | B.14.1.10 Life cycle of REAL systems applying digital twin use case B.14.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case B.14.1.12 Digital infrastructures |
175 | B.14.1.13 Referenced standards or standardization committees (optional) B.14.1.14 Challenges and issues (optional) B.14.1.15 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional) B.14.1.16 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional) |
176 | B.14.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case B.14.2.1 Drawing of use case |
177 | B.14.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional) |
178 | B.14.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.14.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional) B.14.2.5 Others (optional) |
179 | Bibliography |