Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD ISO/IEC TR 30172:2023

$215.11

Internet of things (loT). Digital twin. Use cases

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2023 180
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 undefined
4 CONTENTS
7 FOREWORD
8 INTRODUCTION
9 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
11 4 Abbreviated terms
5 Applications
5.1 Application domains
12 5.2 Life cycle stage coverage
6 Use cases
6.1 Overview
6.2 Properties
13 6.3 Basic statistics
6.3.1 Use cases by application domain
14 Figures
Figure 1 – Distribution of use cases collected in Annex B by application domains
Tables
Table 1 – List of use cases in JTC 1/AG 11 report
15 6.3.2 Use cases by status of life cycle
Figure 2 – Statistics on adopted key technologies from use cases in JTC 1/AG 11 report
16 7 Use case summaries
Table 2 – List of use cases by status of life cycle
Table 3 – List of use cases
18 Annex A (informative)Use case template
A.1 General
A.2 Description of use case
A.2.1 Name of use case
A.2.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
19 A.2.3 Version management
A.2.4 Basic information to use case
20 A.2.5 Scope of use case (bullet points)
A.2.6 Objectives of use case (bullet points)
A.2.7 Narrative of use case
21 A.2.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
A.2.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
22 A.2.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
23 A.2.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
A.2.12 Digital infrastructures
Table A.1 – Description of some qualitative indicators
24 A.2.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
A.2.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
A.2.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
A.2.16 General remarks (optional)
A.2.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
25 A.2.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
A.2.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
A.3 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
A.3.1 Drawing of use case
A.3.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
A.3.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
26 A.3.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
A.3.5 Others (optional)
27 Annex B (informative)Collected use cases
B.1 Smart building – Smart building operation based on digital twins
B.1.1 Description of use case
B.1.1.1 Name of use case
B.1.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.1.1.3 Version management
28 B.1.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.1.1.5 Scope of use case
B.1.1.6 Objectives of use case
29 B.1.1.7 Narrative of use case
33 B.1.1.8 Entities that need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
35 B.1.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
36 B.1.1.10 Life cycle of use case
37 B.1.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.1.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.1.1.13 Challenges and issues
38 B.1.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.1.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.1.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.1.1.17 General remarks (optional)
B.1.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
39 B.1.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.1.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.1.2.1 Drawing of use case
40 B.1.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.1.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.1.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
41 B.1.2.5 Others (optional)
B.2 Industrial smart park – Digital twin based industrial smart park design and construction
B.2.1 Description of use case
B.2.1.1 Name of use case
B.2.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.2.1.3 Version management
42 B.2.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.2.1.5 Scope of use case
43 B.2.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.2.1.7 Narrative of use case
45 B.2.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
B.2.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
46 B.2.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
47 B.2.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.2.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.2.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.2.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
48 B.2.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.2.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.2.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.2.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.2.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.2.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.2.2.1 Drawing of use case
49 B.2.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.2.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.2.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
50 B.2.2.5 Others (optional)
51 B.3 Smart city – Digital twin based smart city management system
B.3.1 Description of use case
B.3.1.1 Name of use case
B.3.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.3.1.3 Version management
52 B.3.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.3.1.5 Scope of use case
53 B.3.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.3.1.7 Narrative of use case
56 B.3.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
57 B.3.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
B.3.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
58 B.3.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.3.1.12 Digital infrastructures
59 B.3.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
60 B.3.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.3.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.3.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.3.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.3.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.3.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
61 B.3.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.3.2.1 Drawing of use case
62 B.3.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.3.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.3.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.3.2.5 Others (optional)
63 B.4 Smart energy – Construction and application of digital twins for a large oil and gas processing facility
B.4.1 Description of use case
B.4.1.1 Name of use case
B.4.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.4.1.3 Version management
B.4.1.4 Basic information to use case
64 B.4.1.5 Scope of use case
B.4.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.4.1.7 Narrative of use case
66 B.4.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
69 B.4.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
72 B.4.1.10 Life cycle of use case
B.4.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
73 B.4.1.12 Digital infrastructures
74 B.4.1.13 Challenges and issues
B.4.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.4.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.4.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
75 B.4.1.17 General remarks (optional)
B.4.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.4.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.4.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.4.2.1 Drawing of use case
B.4.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
76 B.4.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.4.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.4.2.5 Others (optional)
B.5 Smart building – Monitoring of water
B.5.1 Description of use case
B.5.1.1 Name of use case
B.5.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.5.1.3 Version management
77 B.5.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.5.1.5 Scope of use case
78 B.5.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.5.1.7 Narrative of use case
79 B.5.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
81 B.5.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
B.5.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
82 B.5.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.5.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.5.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.5.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
83 B.5.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.5.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.5.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.5.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.5.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
84 B.5.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.5.2.1 Drawing of use case
B.6 Smart Power Grid – Smart grid operation based on a digital twin
B.6.1 Description of use case
B.6.1.1 Name of use case
B.6.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
85 B.6.1.3 Version management
B.6.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.6.1.5 Scope of use case
86 B.6.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.6.1.7 Narrative of use case
88 B.6.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
89 B.6.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
B.6.1.10 Life cycle of use case
90 B.6.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.6.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.6.1.13 Challenges and issues
91 B.6.1.14 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.6.1.15 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.6.1.16 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.6.1.17 General remarks (optional)
B.6.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
92 B.6.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.6.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.6.2.1 Drawing of use case
93 B.6.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.6.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.6.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.6.2.5 Others (optional)
B.7 Smart construction life cycle – Construction-phase digital twin model
B.7.1 Description of use case
B.7.1.1 Name of use case
94 B.7.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.7.1.3 Version management
B.7.1.4 Basic information to use case
95 B.7.1.5 Scope of use case
B.7.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.7.1.7 Narrative of use case
96 Figure B.1 – Geometric analysis of safety prevention
97 Figure B.2 – Identification of close proximity events between heavy machinery
Figure B.3 – Safety training scenario
98 Figure B.4 – Segmented construction components after voxel space point matching
Figure B.5 – Sample defect predictions
99 Figure B.6 – On-site defect visualization, defect confirmation,and addition of remedial work
100 B.7.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
101 B.7.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
102 B.7.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
103 B.7.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.7.1.12 Digital infrastructures
104 B.7.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.7.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.7.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.7.1.16 General remarks (optional)
105 B.7.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.7.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.7.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
106 B.7.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.7.2.1 Drawing of use case
Figure B.7 – Use case diagram: before construction starts
107 Figure B.8 – Use case diagram: during construction
108 B.7.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.7.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.7.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.7.2.5 Others (optional)
B.8 Smart building – Residential explicit demand response – Consumer behavioural digital twin for energy demand prediction
B.8.1 Description of use case
B.8.1.1 Name of use case
109 B.8.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.8.1.3 Version management
B.8.1.4 Basic information to use case
110 B.8.1.5 Scope of use case
B.8.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.8.1.7 Narrative of use case
113 B.8.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
B.8.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
115 B.8.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
B.8.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.8.1.12 Digital infrastructures
116 B.8.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.8.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.8.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.8.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.8.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
117 B.8.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
120 B.8.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
121 B.8.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.8.2.1 Drawing of use case
B.8.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.8.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
122 B.8.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.8.2.5 Others (optional)
B.9 Smart city – Greater Hobart Digital Twin
B.9.1 Description of use case
B.9.1.1 Name of use case
B.9.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.9.1.3 Version management
123 B.9.1.4 Basic information to use case
124 B.9.1.5 Scope of use case (bullet point)
B.9.1.6 Objectives of use case
125 B.9.1.7 Narrative of use case
B.9.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
126 B.9.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
128 B.9.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
B.9.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs)
129 B.9.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.9.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
130 B.9.1.14 Referenced papers or patent(optional)
B.9.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.9.1.16 General remarks(optional)
B.9.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.9.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
131 B.9.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors(optional)
B.9.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.9.2.1 Drawing of use case
B.9.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
132 B.9.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.9.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.10 Smart city – NSW Spatial Digital Twin
B.10.1 Description of use case
B.10.1.1 Name of use case
B.10.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.10.1.3 Version management
B.10.1.4 Basic information to use case
133 B.10.1.5 Scope of use case
B.10.1.6 Objectives of use case
134 B.10.1.7 Narrative of use case
B.10.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
136 B.10.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
137 B.10.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
B.10.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs)
138 B.10.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.10.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
139 B.10.1.14 Referenced papers or patent(optional)
B.10.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.10.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.10.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.10.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
140 B.10.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.10.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.10.2.1 Drawing of use case
B.10.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.10.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.10.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case(optional)
B.11 Transport – Sydney Trains Engineering and Maintenance Digital Twin
B.11.1 Description of use case
B.11.1.1 Name of use case
141 B.11.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.11.1.3 Version management
B.11.1.4 Basic information to use case
142 B.11.1.5 Scope of use case
B.11.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.11.1.7 Narrative of use case
143 B.11.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
B.11.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
144 B.11.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
B.11.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
145 B.11.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.11.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.11.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
146 B.11.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
B.11.1.16 General remarks(optional)
B.11.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.11.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
147 B.11.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.11.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.11.2.1 Drawing of use case
149 B.11.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.11.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.11.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
150 B.11.2.5 Others (optional)
B.12 Transport – TfNSW Infrastructure Delivery Digital Twin
B.12.1 Description of use case
B.12.1.1 Name of use case
B.12.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
B.12.1.3 Version management
151 B.12.1.4 Basic information to use case
B.12.1.5 Scope of use case
152 B.12.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.12.1.7 Narrative of use case
153 B.12.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
B.12.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
154 B.12.1.10 Life cycle of digital twin system in use case
B.12.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
155 B.12.1.12 Digital infrastructures
B.12.1.13 Referenced standards and standardization committees (optional)
B.12.1.14 Referenced papers or patent (optional)
B.12.1.15 Relation with other known use cases, for example common requirements (optional)
156 B.12.1.16 General remarks (optional)
B.12.1.17 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.12.1.18 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
157 B.12.1.19 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.12.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.12.2.1 Drawing of use case
158 B.12.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.12.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.12.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.12.2.5 Others (optional)
159 B.13 Smart energy – From grid planning to grid operation and maintenance, based on grid digital twin(s)
B.13.1 Description of use case
B.13.1.1 Name of use case
B.13.1.2 Digital twin application area/context of use
B.13.1.3 Version management
B.13.1.4 Basic information to use case
160 B.13.1.5 Scope of use case
B.13.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.13.1.7 Narrative of use case
161 B.13.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
163 B.13.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
164 B.13.1.10 Life cycle of REAL systems applying digital twin use case
B.13.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.13.1.12 Digital infrastructures
165 B.13.1.13 Referenced standards or standardization committees (optional)
B.13.1.14 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.13.1.15 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
166 B.13.1.16 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
B.13.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.13.2.1 Drawing of use case
167 B.13.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
B.13.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.13.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.13.2.5 Others (optional)
B.14 Smart energy – Electrical field level subsystem digital twin, as the basis for its specification, commissioning, operation and maintenance
B.14.1 Description of use case
B.14.1.1 Name of use case
B.14.1.2 Digital twin application area or context of use
168 B.14.1.3 Version management
B.14.1.4 Basic information to use case
169 B.14.1.5 Scope of use case
B.14.1.6 Objectives of use case
B.14.1.7 Narrative of use case
170 B.14.1.8 Entities which need to be modelled as digital entities in use case
173 B.14.1.9 Actors: people, organizations or systems
174 B.14.1.10 Life cycle of REAL systems applying digital twin use case
B.14.1.11 Key performance indicators (KPIs) of use case
B.14.1.12 Digital infrastructures
175 B.14.1.13 Referenced standards or standardization committees (optional)
B.14.1.14 Challenges and issues (optional)
B.14.1.15 Data security, privacy and trustworthiness (optional)
B.14.1.16 User requirements and interactions with other actors (optional)
176 B.14.2 Drawings or diagrams depicting the use case
B.14.2.1 Drawing of use case
177 B.14.2.2 Data flow diagram of use case (optional)
178 B.14.2.3 Sequence diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.14.2.4 Deployment diagram(s) of use case (optional)
B.14.2.5 Others (optional)
179 Bibliography
BSI PD ISO/IEC TR 30172:2023
$215.11